Welcome Guest! Create an Account login email: password: remember me: BASKETBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting FOOTBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting MESSAGE BOARD Message Home - Ohio Basketball - Ohio Basketball Recruiting - The O Zone - Ohio Football - Ohio Football Recruiting - Ohio Volleyball - Ohio Baseball - Ohio Olympic Sports... - General OU Discussion... - Website Feedback... - Posting Policy Edit My Profile Private Messages Logout CHAT LINKS site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp Message Board BobcatAttack.com Message Board Ohio Football Topic:  3 Key Plays Topic:  3 Key Plays Author Message BobcatSports General User Member Since: 2/2/2006 Post Count: 1,077 Status: Offline     3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/3/2022 3:32:14 PM  1. The fumble recovery that wasn’t on Toledo’s opening Drive led to Toledo TD. 2. Failure to stop Rockets on 3rd and 20 late in first half backed up in the own end of the field. Drove the length of field and kicked FG. 3. Near interception deep in Toledo territory early in 2nd half that would given us short field and a huge momentum turn. Back to Top mid70sbobcat General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Post Count: 676 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/3/2022 4:18:11 PM  The 4th play I felt was big was when with 5+ minutes left in 2nd quarter we were moving the ball near midfield nicely on the ground. I was hoping they'd grind it out and either get 3 or 7 with little time left. The long pass that was an INT was a 6 to 10 point reversal since they got a FG. Back to Top Casper71 General User Member Since: 12/1/2006 Post Count: 2,932 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/3/2022 4:35:49 PM  The bottom line was Toledo and finn made all the big plays Some calls went against us. I doubt that we had one play from scrimmage over 20 yards. They may have had at least five or six. Back to Top SBH General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Post Count: 3,942 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/3/2022 5:19:02 PM  mid70sbobcat wrote: The 4th play I felt was big was when with 5+ minutes left in 2nd quarter we were moving the ball near midfield nicely on the ground. I was hoping they'd grind it out and either get 3 or 7 with little time left. The long pass that was an INT was a 6 to 10 point reversal since they got a FG. Play of the game. Back to Top TWT General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Alexandria, VA Post Count: 5,005 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/4/2022 2:26:43 AM  Mine was that bad ref call early in the 4th where Ohio had Finn's knee down and scrambled out of it. That was the possession UT went up two scores. Toledo improbable scrambles all game to keep drives alive. At the end of the day however take away a couple decisive plays Toledo still wins by 3 or 7 points. Toledo was in control the whole game so no more than very slight chance was out there to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. The entire second half I kept asking myself what Ohio's path to victory was if they can't move the chains. Most Memorable Bobcat Events Attended 2010 97-83 win over Georgetown in NCAA 1st round 2012 45-13 victory over ULM in the Independence Bowl 2015 34-3 drubbing of Miami @ Peden front of 25,086 Back to Top mid70sbobcat General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Post Count: 676 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/4/2022 10:41:37 AM  Campus Flow wrote: Mine was that bad ref call early in the 4th where Ohio had Finn's knee down and scrambled out of it. That was the possession UT went up two scores. Toledo improbable scrambles all game to keep drives alive. At the end of the day however take away a couple decisive plays Toledo still wins by 3 or 7 points. Toledo was in control the whole game so no more than very slight chance was out there to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. The entire second half I kept asking myself what Ohio's path to victory was if they can't move the chains. One play that could have made a difference, even given the imbalance in stats, was the chance Alvin Floyd for the INT. Back to Top Andrew Ruck General User Member Since: 12/22/2004 Location: Columbus, OH Post Count: 4,882 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/4/2022 5:45:21 PM  3rd and 20 was massive. We were heading to get the ball back with a short field going into the half and getting the ball to start the 2nd. Instead they grind their way to a long scoring drive. Andrew Ruck B.B.A. 2003 Back to Top spongeBOB CATpants General User Member Since: 8/16/2016 Post Count: 989 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 10:44:16 AM  If the refs gave us that fumble recovery, I truly think this game could've turned into a potential blowout. Absolutely crushing. I don't see how there was any doubt that was a fumble + recovery by Ohio. Even the announcers were 100% confident that was Ohio's ball. Back to Top UpSan Bobcat General User Member Since: 8/30/2005 Location: Upper Sandusky, OH Post Count: 3,799 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 1:01:44 PM  spongeBOB CATpants wrote: If the refs gave us that fumble recovery, I truly think this game could've turned into a potential blowout. Absolutely crushing. I don't see how there was any doubt that was a fumble + recovery by Ohio. Even the announcers were 100% confident that was Ohio's ball. I've only seen the replay shown in the stadium, but this is what I've heard on this one, that everyone else seeing multiple replays was certain Ohio would get the ball. However, on the run by Finn when Ohio challenged him being down, the replay "confirmed" that he was not down. After the first call, I'm not sure I trust that to be the case, so for those who saw that one on replay, was Finn really not down? Back to Top OhioCatFan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Athens, OH Post Count: 14,168 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 1:12:51 PM  UpSan Bobcat wrote: spongeBOB CATpants wrote: If the refs gave us that fumble recovery, I truly think this game could've turned into a potential blowout. Absolutely crushing. I don't see how there was any doubt that was a fumble + recovery by Ohio. Even the announcers were 100% confident that was Ohio's ball. I've only seen the replay shown in the stadium, but this is what I've heard on this one, that everyone else seeing multiple replays was certain Ohio would get the ball. However, on the run by Finn when Ohio challenged him being down, the replay "confirmed" that he was not down. After the first call, I'm not sure I trust that to be the case, so for those who saw that one on replay, was Finn really not down? I was at the stadium too, and when I looked at the Toledo players after that fumble and while the replay was being conducted their body language seemed to indicate that many of them also thought it was a fumble. The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA "It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right." Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org Back to Top spongeBOB CATpants General User Member Since: 8/16/2016 Post Count: 989 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 1:29:37 PM  UpSan Bobcat wrote: spongeBOB CATpants wrote: If the refs gave us that fumble recovery, I truly think this game could've turned into a potential blowout. Absolutely crushing. I don't see how there was any doubt that was a fumble + recovery by Ohio. Even the announcers were 100% confident that was Ohio's ball. I've only seen the replay shown in the stadium, but this is what I've heard on this one, that everyone else seeing multiple replays was certain Ohio would get the ball. However, on the run by Finn when Ohio challenged him being down, the replay "confirmed" that he was not down. After the first call, I'm not sure I trust that to be the case, so for those who saw that one on replay, was Finn really not down? I watched on TV, it did not look like Finn was down. Was hoping we would get a makeup call there. Back to Top Victory General User Member Since: 3/10/2012 Post Count: 2,199 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 1:38:42 PM  Guys, It WAS a fumble. The refs initially missed that call but I don't think after watching the replay that the fact that it was a fumble was in dispute by anyone. Ohio just failed to recover it before going out of bounds. People claiming that it was a fumble and thus it was Bobcat's ball are not looking at the right thing. The announcers at first were looking at if it was a fumble and, yes, were 100% sure it was a fumble. But then when they looked at the recovery they saw Ohio was out of bounds before clear control was established. That call had to stand. Even if it had been ruled a fumble on the field that was recovered by Ohio then I think there would have been enough evidence to change it to a fumble out of bounds. If you go back and look and see a call that should have been overturned then you are only watching for a fumble and not also watching for a clear recovery. Back to Top BobcatSports General User Member Since: 2/2/2006 Post Count: 1,077 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 1:45:28 PM  I thought the announcers cleared it up that Finn DID fumble BUT OHIO did not gain clear recovery before touching the out of bounds marker thus NO recovery still Toledo ball. I also thought the various replays confirmed that Finn’s knee nor shin touched the ground and therefore was not sacked for loss. This was just a game where we needed ALL the breaks to go our way and none of them did. Back to Top spongeBOB CATpants General User Member Since: 8/16/2016 Post Count: 989 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 3:09:31 PM  Victory wrote: Guys, It WAS a fumble. The refs initially missed that call but I don't think after watching the replay that the fact that it was a fumble was in dispute by anyone. Ohio just failed to recover it before going out of bounds. People claiming that it was a fumble and thus it was Bobcat's ball are not looking at the right thing. The announcers at first were looking at if it was a fumble and, yes, were 100% sure it was a fumble. But then when they looked at the recovery they saw Ohio was out of bounds before clear control was established. That call had to stand. Even if it had been ruled a fumble on the field that was recovered by Ohio then I think there would have been enough evidence to change it to a fumble out of bounds. If you go back and look and see a call that should have been overturned then you are only watching for a fumble and not also watching for a clear recovery. I disagree. The refs confirmed the call on the field was correct, which was that the player was ruled down by contact before the ball came loose. I don't believe the call on the field was ruled a fumble. Correct me if I'm wrong. Wouldn't they have clarified that the ball was fumbled but recovered out of bounds if that was the conclusion in the replay booth? All they said was that the call on the field was confirmed. I had some adult sodas prior to the game so please correct me if my memory is fuzzy. Back to Top Deciduous Forest Cat General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Ohio Post Count: 4,380 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 4:16:52 PM  spongeBOB CATpants wrote: Victory wrote: Guys, It WAS a fumble. The refs initially missed that call but I don't think after watching the replay that the fact that it was a fumble was in dispute by anyone. Ohio just failed to recover it before going out of bounds. People claiming that it was a fumble and thus it was Bobcat's ball are not looking at the right thing. The announcers at first were looking at if it was a fumble and, yes, were 100% sure it was a fumble. But then when they looked at the recovery they saw Ohio was out of bounds before clear control was established. That call had to stand. Even if it had been ruled a fumble on the field that was recovered by Ohio then I think there would have been enough evidence to change it to a fumble out of bounds. If you go back and look and see a call that should have been overturned then you are only watching for a fumble and not also watching for a clear recovery. I disagree. The refs confirmed the call on the field was correct, which was that the player was ruled down by contact before the ball came loose. I don't believe the call on the field was ruled a fumble. Correct me if I'm wrong. Wouldn't they have clarified that the ball was fumbled but recovered out of bounds if that was the conclusion in the replay booth? All they said was that the call on the field was confirmed. I had some adult sodas prior to the game so please correct me if my memory is fuzzy. Yes, I remember it exactly the same. After watching the replay on tv, it's clear the call had to be that there was no possession by Bryce Houston before going OB. The refs could have explained that rather than just saying the call was confirmed. the fumble was clear as day and the refs only said the call on the field was confirmed. If they correctly ruled it a fumble then toledo would have had the ball a yard further up the field. The refs ate it on that whole process. Back to Top spongeBOB CATpants General User Member Since: 8/16/2016 Post Count: 989 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 4:28:31 PM  Deciduous Forest Cat wrote: spongeBOB CATpants wrote: Victory wrote: Guys, It WAS a fumble. The refs initially missed that call but I don't think after watching the replay that the fact that it was a fumble was in dispute by anyone. Ohio just failed to recover it before going out of bounds. People claiming that it was a fumble and thus it was Bobcat's ball are not looking at the right thing. The announcers at first were looking at if it was a fumble and, yes, were 100% sure it was a fumble. But then when they looked at the recovery they saw Ohio was out of bounds before clear control was established. That call had to stand. Even if it had been ruled a fumble on the field that was recovered by Ohio then I think there would have been enough evidence to change it to a fumble out of bounds. If you go back and look and see a call that should have been overturned then you are only watching for a fumble and not also watching for a clear recovery. I disagree. The refs confirmed the call on the field was correct, which was that the player was ruled down by contact before the ball came loose. I don't believe the call on the field was ruled a fumble. Correct me if I'm wrong. Wouldn't they have clarified that the ball was fumbled but recovered out of bounds if that was the conclusion in the replay booth? All they said was that the call on the field was confirmed. I had some adult sodas prior to the game so please correct me if my memory is fuzzy. Yes, I remember it exactly the same. After watching the replay on tv, it's clear the call had to be that there was no possession by Bryce Houston before going OB. The refs could have explained that rather than just saying the call was confirmed. the fumble was clear as day and the refs only said the call on the field was confirmed. If they correctly ruled it a fumble then toledo would have had the ball a yard further up the field. The refs ate it on that whole process. Ok thanks for the confirmation, I was so pissed at that moment that I thought I remembered exactly how it played out. IMO we recovered the fumble as well. If that was the component of the play that was really being reviewed, maybe they felt there wasn't enough evidence we had control of the ball prior to rolling out of bounds? IMO, I thought we fell on it inbounds as the defender was rolling out of bounds. Back to Top L.C. General User Member Since: 8/31/2005 Location: United States Post Count: 10,313 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 6:26:35 PM  Andrew Ruck wrote: 3rd and 20 was massive. We were heading to get the ball back with a short field going into the half and getting the ball to start the 2nd. Instead they grind their way to a long scoring drive. I was pretty shocked when Ohio only rushed 3 on that play. That hasn't been how they had been doing things, and it didn't turn out well. This play did leave me with a question for BTC, however. After the play, Toledo lined up for another play, and was called for a 5 yard penalty. After that penalty, they went back and reviewed whether the Toledo player had, in fact, actually gained the first down. I thought that after another play has been initiated, you could no longer review the preceding one. I'm guessing that since there was no snap, only a penalty, it didn't negate the possibility of review of the prior play? “We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus Back to Top Victory General User Member Since: 3/10/2012 Post Count: 2,199 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 6:37:16 PM  L.C. wrote: Andrew Ruck wrote: 3rd and 20 was massive. We were heading to get the ball back with a short field going into the half and getting the ball to start the 2nd. Instead they grind their way to a long scoring drive. I was pretty shocked when Ohio only rushed 3 on that play. That hasn't been how they had been doing things, and it didn't turn out well. This play did leave me with a question for BTC, however. After the play, Toledo lined up for another play, and was called for a 5 yard penalty. After that penalty, they went back and reviewed whether the Toledo player had, in fact, actually gained the first down. I thought that after another play has been initiated, you could no longer review the preceding one. I'm guessing that since there was no snap, only a penalty, it didn't negate the possibility of review of the prior play? If this weren't the case could I prevent you from reviewing my actually out of bounds game winning 50 yard touchdown reception by walking up to the corner that covered me and punching him? Back to Top L.C. General User Member Since: 8/31/2005 Location: United States Post Count: 10,313 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 9:23:01 PM  Victory wrote: If this weren't the case could I prevent you from reviewing my actually out of bounds game winning 50 yard touchdown reception by walking up to the corner that covered me and punching him? Clearly, no. But Ohio and Toledo both lined up for the next play, and Toledo actually snapped it, but was called for illegal procedure. I would have thought that that was a "play". “We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus Back to Top BillyTheCat General User Member Since: 10/6/2012 Post Count: 9,808 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/5/2022 10:40:25 PM  L.C. wrote: Victory wrote: If this weren't the case could I prevent you from reviewing my actually out of bounds game winning 50 yard touchdown reception by walking up to the corner that covered me and punching him? Clearly, no. But Ohio and Toledo both lined up for the next play, and Toledo actually snapped it, but was called for illegal procedure. I would have thought that that was a "play". It’s not a play and it’s not a snap. And illegal procedure is a dead ball foul, therefore you do not have a legal snap and you can review the play. Back to Top L.C. General User Member Since: 8/31/2005 Location: United States Post Count: 10,313 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/6/2022 1:08:02 PM  BillyTheCat wrote: L.C. wrote: Victory wrote: If this weren't the case could I prevent you from reviewing my actually out of bounds game winning 50 yard touchdown reception by walking up to the corner that covered me and punching him? Clearly, no. But Ohio and Toledo both lined up for the next play, and Toledo actually snapped it, but was called for illegal procedure. I would have thought that that was a "play". It’s not a play and it’s not a snap. And illegal procedure is a dead ball foul, therefore you do not have a legal snap and you can review the play. Thanks, BTC. I presumed that that was the explanation, but it seemed odd. “We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus Back to Top BillyTheCat General User Member Since: 10/6/2012 Post Count: 9,808 Status: Offline     RE: 3 Key Plays    Posted: 12/6/2022 8:38:07 PM  L.C. wrote: BillyTheCat wrote: L.C. wrote: Victory wrote: If this weren't the case could I prevent you from reviewing my actually out of bounds game winning 50 yard touchdown reception by walking up to the corner that covered me and punching him? Clearly, no. But Ohio and Toledo both lined up for the next play, and Toledo actually snapped it, but was called for illegal procedure. I would have thought that that was a "play". It’s not a play and it’s not a snap. And illegal procedure is a dead ball foul, therefore you do not have a legal snap and you can review the play. Thanks, BTC. I presumed that that was the explanation, but it seemed odd. Not something you see often. Back to Top Showing Replies:   1 - 22  of 22 Posts Jump to Page:   1 View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               WHO'S ONLINE There are 510 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com 509 Guests 1 Registered User:   El Gato Roberto There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties