menu
Logo
dark_mode
Logo
dark_mode
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: NCAA Tournament: 90 Teams?
Page: 1 of 1
M.D.W.S.T
General User
Member Since: 12/23/2021
Post Count: 3,812
mail
M.D.W.S.T
mail
Posted: 1/3/2023 4:44 PM
Today the NCAA’s Division I Transformation Committee - co-chaired by SEC commissioner Greg Sankey and... our very own Julie Cromer - issued a 39-page report that included a recommendation for 25% of active Division I members in the NCAA tournament.

This would include both the men's and women's NCAA tournaments and expand both fields. Each tournament currently invites 68 teams. There are 358 Division I men's basketball programs and 350 women's programs. A field of 25% would break down to roughly 90 teams for each tournament, assuming the NCAA would seek to keep both fields the same size.

Tuesday's recommendation is strictly that — a recommendation. It will go to the Division I board of directors for consideration at next week's NCAA convention. Expansion would also require approval of each sport's governing body. The committee called for final recommendations to be made by January 2024 in time to be implemented for the 2024-25 seasons.

This would be great for mid-majors as most solid P5 teams already make the tournament. An additional 22 teams would give the MAC a far greater chance to get in 2 or more teams.

https://sports.yahoo.com/ncaa-committee-recommendation-wo...
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,861
GC105
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 1/3/2023 6:30 PM
I'd love to see an expanded tournament, but I'd hedge my bets on getting more mid-majors in the tournament than you might think. This will just give the Ps more juice behind putting a 17-14 Illinois in before a 25-5 St. Peters.
M.D.W.S.T
General User
Member Since: 12/23/2021
Post Count: 3,812
mail
M.D.W.S.T
mail
Posted: 1/3/2023 7:27 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
I'd love to see an expanded tournament, but I'd hedge my bets on getting more mid-majors in the tournament than you might think. This will just give the Ps more juice behind putting a 17-14 Illinois in before a 25-5 St. Peters.
You're not wrong.

I suppose it'd be too much to hope for nods for reg season + conf champs in G5.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,387
AS
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 1/3/2023 9:36 PM
If you went with 96 teams and the top 32 (seeds 1 - 8 in each region) got a bye on Tuesday and the other 64 teams played on Tuesday like the four teams that play in the current play-in games, you could still get the tournament done in the same number of weeks.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,171
JM
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 1/3/2023 9:42 PM
I'm opposed to watering down the tournament. This may lead to the demise of conference tournaments.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,977
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 1/3/2023 11:12 PM
M.D.W.S.T wrote:expand_more
Today the NCAA’s Division I Transformation Committee - co-chaired by SEC commissioner Greg Sankey and... our very own Julie Cromer - issued a 39-page report that included a recommendation for 25% of active Division I members in the NCAA tournament.

This would include both the men's and women's NCAA tournaments and expand both fields. Each tournament currently invites 68 teams. There are 358 Division I men's basketball programs and 350 women's programs. A field of 25% would break down to roughly 90 teams for each tournament, assuming the NCAA would seek to keep both fields the same size.

Tuesday's recommendation is strictly that — a recommendation. It will go to the Division I board of directors for consideration at next week's NCAA convention. Expansion would also require approval of each sport's governing body. The committee called for final recommendations to be made by January 2024 in time to be implemented for the 2024-25 seasons.

This would be great for mid-majors as most solid P5 teams already make the tournament. An additional 22 teams would give the MAC a far greater chance to get in 2 or more teams.

https://sports.yahoo.com/ncaa-committee-recommendation-wo...
Thanks for this information. It sounds promising. I know that it's been discussed before, but this time it sounds like the idea is going to get serious consideration.
The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org
M.D.W.S.T
General User
Member Since: 12/23/2021
Post Count: 3,812
mail
M.D.W.S.T
mail
Posted: 1/4/2023 11:02 AM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
I'm opposed to watering down the tournament. This may lead to the demise of conference tournaments.
Someone else mentioned it, but from the small tidbits I've seen, I believe the thinking is basically expanding the "play-in" games, not necessarily making the #1 seed play the #90 seed.

*edit*
Also, having Julie in the room - I can't imagine shes advocating for OU and other MAC schools to become watered down. I have to think shes being the voice for mid-majors here.

I can't even name many teams that were in the Sweet 16 last season, but I do remember the run Saint Peters made. More chances to replicate that I have to think is the entire angle.
Last Edited: 1/4/2023 11:05:43 AM by M.D.W.S.T
Urban Bobcat
General User
UB
Member Since: 9/14/2007
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 859
UB
mail
Urban Bobcat
mail
Posted: 1/4/2023 11:44 AM
$$$$$$$.
URBAN BOBCAT
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
P
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 1/4/2023 12:19 PM
It sort of makes sense. The tourney moved to 68 teams in the mid-1980s when there were only about 250 D1 teams. Now some 35 years later there are about 350 teams, around a 50% increase. A move to 96 keeps pace with the times. The NIT would be the big loser because more big-name schools would be included in the Dance. The other tourneys would have even less interest, but they currently get so little typical fan interest already that they might not notice it.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.

Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,134
O69
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 1/4/2023 1:07 PM
I wonder what problem is trying to be solved here.
Can somebody hit a pull up jumper for me?.....
Cellis033
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2021
Location: Powell, OH
Post Count: 1,583
mail
Cellis033
mail
Posted: 1/4/2023 2:44 PM
I don't really see too many benefits with expanding to 90 teams as I believe it could reduce the prestige of the NCAA tourney, as I could see more sub 500 P5 teams slip through the cracks. But, I can also see the mid majors being more fairly represented for example auto bids to conference tournament winner and regular season champ, or auto bid to second place team if a team won both regular season and tourney.
Chase
OU Engineering Technology and Management '24
Honda of America Assembly Equipment Engineer

Muck Fiami
Kant read, Kant write
Bowling Green Normie School
what even is Kron's mascot
Last Edited: 1/17/2023 5:35:42 PM by Cellis033
100%Cat
General User
Member Since: 1/17/2013
Post Count: 2,763
mail
100%Cat
mail
Posted: 1/4/2023 5:23 PM
It's not broken, this has to be about money. I know some low seeds have made runs, but let's be realistic. Under the current format, the 13-16 seed teams are not going to win this tournament. Maybe they win a game or two for a good story, but they aren't winning the whole thing. Now we want to add more teams that can't win it?

I also agree with previous posts that it's going to mean more P5 teams than it will more small conference teams. Let's find a new way to reward the .500 teams in the P5 conferences...
Athens
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,496
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 1/4/2023 5:45 PM
To make it at all fair when expanding to 96 teams regular season conference champs should be let in with conference tournament winners.

I read the decision on tournament expansion will be made within a year and in place for 2024-25.
Most Memorable Bobcat Events Attended
2010 97-83 win over Georgetown in NCAA 1st round
2012 45-13 victory over ULM in the Independence Bowl
2015 34-3 drubbing of Fiami @ Peden with 25,086 fans
2023 10-7 near shutout of Iowa State @ Solich Field
2025 17-10 defeat of WVU @ Peden in front of 26,740
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,717
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted: 1/5/2023 3:26 PM
This has been a big movement from our own bornacatfan...in fact I think he wants to see 128. I am anxiously awaiting his reply here.
Andrew Ruck
B.B.A. 2003
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
C66
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 1/5/2023 4:26 PM
I’m old fashioned, I could do without conference championship tournaments. But I know it’s all about the money. If no tourney, games during the season mean so much more.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,734
BLSS
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 1/5/2023 5:59 PM
More basketball seems good to me.

And ultimately, I think this has the potential to be very good for leagues like the MAC. The MACs best tournament teams (at least in the time I've followed the league) -- teams like the Kent State Elite 8 team, our Sweet 16 team -- had to fight hard to get out of the MAC tournament.

It's not out of the realm of possibility that a couple of MAC teams could advance in the tournament in the same year, and that's a quick ticket to improving the conference's profile. Ultimately, you want as many chips on the table as possible given the randomness of any single elimination tournament.
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,508
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 1/5/2023 6:02 PM
Why not add teams to NCAA tourney, keep conference tourneys, and keep season total games played by eliminating several DII, DIII, and/or other non NCAA team games from early season schedules?
RS Bobcat
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,977
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 1/6/2023 1:51 AM
RSB + BLSS both make astute comments here. I’m all for an expanded tournament and keeping conference tourneys. Who needs games against UC-C, Chicago State and the like.
The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org
longtiimelurker
General User
L
Member Since: 2/2/2017
Post Count: 600
L
mail
longtiimelurker
mail
Posted: 1/7/2023 9:22 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
RSB + BLSS both make astute comments here. I’m all for an expanded tournament and keeping conference tourneys. Who needs games against UC-C, Chicago State and the like.
Chicago State is a D1 team. Many P5 team fans say the same about playing ASun, MAC, MEAC, and other lower-tier teams. Are you implying that we should not lower ourselves to playing Low Majors? You do realize they are ranked above others on our schedule Northern Illinois, Eastern Michigan, and Eastern Illinois. Personally, I would prefer to tilt at P5 schools but after upsetting UVA, Georgetown, Michigan, and others in the past decade I imagine it is hard to get teams to play us and impossible to get them to come to play us here.
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 1/17/2023 2:14 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
I'd love to see an expanded tournament, but I'd hedge my bets on getting more mid-majors in the tournament than you might think. This will just give the Ps more juice behind putting a 17-14 Illinois in before a 25-5 St. Peters.
Agreed. The only way I think it's worthwhile is if Regular season conference champions AND conference tournament champions get auto-bids. Fill in at-large from there. I would almost bet my mortgage that the NCAA isn't even considering that idea.
Showing Messages: 1 - 20 of 20
View Other Ohio Basketball Topics
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links
chevron_left
Saturday, October 17, 2026
chevron_right
Who's Online

There are 85 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com

85 Guests