menu
Logo
dark_mode
Logo
dark_mode
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: GOOGLE THIS
Page: 3 of 3
El Gato Roberto
General User
EGR
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 1,220
EGR
mail
El Gato Roberto
mail
Posted: 1/3/2025 7:16 PM
I think the problem is that the conferences are too large to produce a legitimate champion.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,387
AS
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 1/4/2025 2:05 PM
El Gato Roberto wrote:expand_more
I think the problem is that the conferences are too large to produce a legitimate champion.
Bingo! Check out the to$u and Oregon schedules next year. The only tough game Oregon has in Penn State and the combined Big 10 record of to$u is 38 and 43.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,860
BTC
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/4/2025 5:03 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
I think the problem is that the conferences are too large to produce a legitimate champion.
Bingo! Check out the to$u and Oregon schedules next year. The only tough game Oregon has in Penn State and the combined Big 10 record of to$u is 38 and 43.
What’s our combined record in the MAC with Miami, both in the MAC Championships this year?

I mean, our MAC schedule was 38-50, so not sure what you are saying? Counting UMASS, Miami was 48-51.

Seems OSU league schedule was tougher than ours based W-L’s and %
Last Edited: 1/4/2025 5:20:05 PM by BillyTheCat
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,387
AS
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 1/4/2025 6:55 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
I think the problem is that the conferences are too large to produce a legitimate champion.
Bingo! Check out the to$u and Oregon schedules next year. The only tough game Oregon has in Penn State and the combined Big 10 record of to$u is 38 and 43.
What’s our combined record in the MAC with Miami, both in the MAC Championships this year?

I mean, our MAC schedule was 38-50, so not sure what you are saying? Counting UMASS, Miami was 48-51.

Seems OSU league schedule was tougher than ours based W-L’s and %
I'm saying what El Gato said. The bigger the league the more difficult it is to produce a legitimate league champion. In any given year, when you only play 53% of your possible opponents, that makes for an interesting "league" schedule.
El Gato Roberto
General User
EGR
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 1,220
EGR
mail
El Gato Roberto
mail
Posted: 1/5/2025 12:05 AM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
I think the problem is that the conferences are too large to produce a legitimate champion.
Bingo! Check out the to$u and Oregon schedules next year. The only tough game Oregon has in Penn State and the combined Big 10 record of to$u is 38 and 43.
What’s our combined record in the MAC with Miami, both in the MAC Championships this year?

I mean, our MAC schedule was 38-50, so not sure what you are saying? Counting UMASS, Miami was 48-51.

Seems OSU league schedule was tougher than ours based W-L’s and %
I'm saying what El Gato said. The bigger the league the more difficult it is to produce a legitimate league champion. In any given year, when you only play 53% of your possible opponents, that makes for an interesting "league" schedule.

Yes, Mr Swank, that is exactly what I meant.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,860
BTC
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/5/2025 10:19 AM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
I think the problem is that the conferences are too large to produce a legitimate champion.
Bingo! Check out the to$u and Oregon schedules next year. The only tough game Oregon has in Penn State and the combined Big 10 record of to$u is 38 and 43.
What’s our combined record in the MAC with Miami, both in the MAC Championships this year?

I mean, our MAC schedule was 38-50, so not sure what you are saying? Counting UMASS, Miami was 48-51.

Seems OSU league schedule was tougher than ours based W-L’s and %
I'm saying what El Gato said. The bigger the league the more difficult it is to produce a legitimate league champion. In any given year, when you only play 53% of your possible opponents, that makes for an interesting "league" schedule.
Got it!
M.D.W.S.T
General User
Member Since: 12/23/2021
Post Count: 3,812
mail
M.D.W.S.T
mail
Posted: 1/6/2025 10:05 AM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
I think the problem is that the conferences are too large to produce a legitimate champion.
Bingo! Check out the to$u and Oregon schedules next year. The only tough game Oregon has in Penn State and the combined Big 10 record of to$u is 38 and 43.
What’s our combined record in the MAC with Miami, both in the MAC Championships this year?

I mean, our MAC schedule was 38-50, so not sure what you are saying? Counting UMASS, Miami was 48-51.

Seems OSU league schedule was tougher than ours based W-L’s and %
I'm saying what El Gato said. The bigger the league the more difficult it is to produce a legitimate league champion. In any given year, when you only play 53% of your possible opponents, that makes for an interesting "league" schedule.
And only getting bigger.

And now the CFP has everyone up in arms about doing away with conference championships.

I feel like we're not far from non-con games being a thing of the past. Quite unfortunate.

Just a runaway train of nil dollars, tv dollars, and whiners.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,734
BLSS
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 1/6/2025 10:33 AM
M.D.W.S.T wrote:expand_more
I think the problem is that the conferences are too large to produce a legitimate champion.
Bingo! Check out the to$u and Oregon schedules next year. The only tough game Oregon has in Penn State and the combined Big 10 record of to$u is 38 and 43.
What’s our combined record in the MAC with Miami, both in the MAC Championships this year?

I mean, our MAC schedule was 38-50, so not sure what you are saying? Counting UMASS, Miami was 48-51.

Seems OSU league schedule was tougher than ours based W-L’s and %
I'm saying what El Gato said. The bigger the league the more difficult it is to produce a legitimate league champion. In any given year, when you only play 53% of your possible opponents, that makes for an interesting "league" schedule.
And only getting bigger.

And now the CFP has everyone up in arms about doing away with conference championships.

I feel like we're not far from non-con games being a thing of the past. Quite unfortunate.

Just a runaway train of nil dollars, tv dollars, and whiners.
To me the writing on the wall seems pretty clear. We're headed to a 'Premier League' for college football. Basically the top tier (roughly the P4), breaking away from the rest.

This will allow them to negotiate one, single TV deal as opposed to several TV deals (i.e. per conference and for the playoffs) and also bring some geographic sanity to conferences again.
El Gato Roberto
General User
EGR
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 1,220
EGR
mail
El Gato Roberto
mail
Posted: 1/6/2025 12:01 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
I think the problem is that the conferences are too large to produce a legitimate champion.
Bingo! Check out the to$u and Oregon schedules next year. The only tough game Oregon has in Penn State and the combined Big 10 record of to$u is 38 and 43.
What’s our combined record in the MAC with Miami, both in the MAC Championships this year?

I mean, our MAC schedule was 38-50, so not sure what you are saying? Counting UMASS, Miami was 48-51.

Seems OSU league schedule was tougher than ours based W-L’s and %
I'm saying what El Gato said. The bigger the league the more difficult it is to produce a legitimate league champion. In any given year, when you only play 53% of your possible opponents, that makes for an interesting "league" schedule.
And only getting bigger.

And now the CFP has everyone up in arms about doing away with conference championships.

I feel like we're not far from non-con games being a thing of the past. Quite unfortunate.

Just a runaway train of nil dollars, tv dollars, and whiners.
To me the writing on the wall seems pretty clear. We're headed to a 'Premier League' for college football. Basically the top tier (roughly the P4), breaking away from the rest.

This will allow them to negotiate one, single TV deal as opposed to several TV deals (i.e. per conference and for the playoffs) and also bring some geographic sanity to conferences again.
Sadly, I believe you are correct. By not counting Jr college time towards eligibility, it allows the pro leagues to keep the players developing longer. I think we will see more Rookies going into the league as starters. I wonder if they will go "all-in" and allow promotions and demotions? Purdue could be a nice fit in the MAC West, just sayin' 😂
Showing Messages: 51 - 59 of 59
View Other Ohio Football Topics
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
chevron_backward
MAC News Links
chevron_left
Saturday, October 17, 2026
chevron_right
Who's Online

There are 96 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com

93 Guests