Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  RE: Smith has been fired

Topic:  RE: Smith has been fired
Author
Message
Mike Coleman
Administrator



Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 2,002

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 5:17:10 PM 
Diamond Cat wrote:
I loved Solich so not hitting him over the head here. As many of you mentioned, Frank was involved in a widely known incident involving alcohol. He did not lose his job (thank God).

The University has a history in making that decision. It would seem to indicate Smith was treated more harshly than others (selective enforcement).

So it has to be the affairs, etc.? The response letter from Elliott is a must read.

How about these statements:

"The reprimand related to coaches toasting in the offices after home victories. Finally, the coaches were toasting with Bourbon provided by your husband to Coach Smith in his office."

"We have numerous other incidents of OU faculty and staff drinking alcohol in offices, OU facilities and on campus. For instance, an OU Associate AD invited Coach Smith to the office of a distinguished faculty member - Dr.(insert name) - offered a glass of bourbon to the Associate AD and Coach Smith and all three drank the alcohol in the faculty member's office."

Popcorn being consumed now.


He also implies OU has motivation to get rid of Smith then redacts the reason.

The part about the girl not being a student is laughable though. Oh yeah, I met this girl at an Athens establishment but it never came up that I was the football coach and she was a student.

Costco doesn't have enough popcorn for this.
Back to Top
  
spongeBOB CATpants
General User



Member Since: 8/16/2016
Post Count: 1,352

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 5:28:01 PM 
Front page headliner of The Athletic as of 5:26. Somebody mentioned at one point that they thought the university wouldn't think this would get much attention lol its making waves at this point. I got people texting me left and right that pay no attention to Ohio football.
Back to Top
  
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User

Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,675

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 5:28:14 PM 
It's not super clear to me why people here are so focused on the alcohol.

Our 40-something coach, one of the highest paid employees at the university, had an ongoing relationship with an undergrad. Does anybody actually believe his attorney's letter that he didn't know that?

His lawyer may well be right that there's no explicit policy against that, and maybe in the end that'll be enough to get Smith paid out.

But at minimum that shows really, really, really poor judgment on Smith's part.

Remember that the goal of the lawyer releasing this letter is to try and own the narrative. That means this is the best possible spin they can put on the situation. It's not a coincidence the reference to a four month relationship with an undergrad is a sentence, but there's two paragraphs about drinking bourbon with high level people at the University.

And there seem to be a lot of people who are burying the lede the way Smith's lawyer intended.

Sure, Lane Kiffin is doing the same thing. Do we have any desire to be like LSU and Lane Kiffin as an institution?

Last Edited: 12/18/2025 5:35:07 PM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame

Back to Top
  
Mike Coleman
Administrator



Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 2,002

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 5:35:12 PM 
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:
It's not super clear to me why people here are so focused on the alcohol.

Our 40-something coach, one of the highest paid employees at the university, had an ongoing relationship with an undergrad. Does anybody actually believe his attorney's letter that he didn't know that?

His lawyer may well be right that there's no explicit policy against that, and maybe in the end that'll be enough to get Smith paid out.

But at minimum that shows really, really, really poor judgment on Smith's part.

Remember that the goal of the lawyer releasing this letter is to try and own the narrative. That means this is the best possible spin they can put on the situation.

It's not a coincidence the reference to a four month relationship with an undergrad is a sentence, but there's two paragraphs about drinking bourbon with high level people at the University.



Four out of five clauses that the university used to prove cause involve alcohol. If people are talking about it, ask the univ., lol.
Back to Top
  
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User

Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,675

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 5:38:12 PM 
Mike Coleman wrote:


Four out of five clauses that the university used to prove cause involve alcohol. If people are talking about it, ask them lol.


OJ Simpson was charged with burglary in 2007, too. Doesn't mean those are the allegations about him people should be focused on.
Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,832

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 6:18:41 PM 
BryanHall wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:
Just to lay it all out, as far as I can tell right now. . .

The letter from the University states the following as their rationale:

1. Smith had an extra-marital affair/
2. Smith had a relationship with an undergrad.
3. Smith had a relationship with a 41 year old woman.
4. He was witnessed at the OU Inn -- which I think is University property -- by a football player's parents. He seems to have acknowledged this to the AD.
5. He was intoxicated at a public event where he was representing the University.

The response to that letter from his lawyer claims:

1. There was no extra-marital affair because he was separated from his wife.
2. Smith had a relationship with an undergrad for 4 months.
3. He didn't know she was an undergrad.
4. There's no policy against that.
5. He also had a relationship with a 41 year old woman, and the parent of a football player saw him with that woman at the OU Inn.
6. He was living at the OU Inn
7. He wasn't drunk at any events.

I think that's the full range right now.


There has to be more to this story, because this all right here is basically he said/she said and makes it even the sillier that OU hasn't announced more. Unless he was drunk while coaching a game, which would definitely be something. What image are they trying to protect?


If there was more to the story why wouldn't they disclose it? It does them no good to wait to disclose more later.



Oh I agree with you. The more this news slowly trickles out instead of ripping the band aid off the worse it looks for OU, IMO.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,584

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 6:32:50 PM 
GoCats105 wrote:
Oh I agree with you. The more this news slowly trickles out instead of ripping the band aid off the worse it looks for OU, IMO.

IDK. The more that leaks out, quite possibly it will look worse for both parties. It certainly seems on it's way to an ugly lawsuit that will tarnish a lot of people.

Last Edited: 12/18/2025 8:34:34 PM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,832

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 6:34:14 PM 
OhioCatFan wrote:
Bitchy Incognito wrote:
Could this come down to a court determining if OU's employment clauses and its enforcement of them were sufficiently well-crafted to sustain scrutiny with regard to vagueness and/or adhesion to current pubic standards? I suppose case law could also figure in.

Additional reading:

https://law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-is-...

https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?...

Agree that the 41-year-old would not seem to be a problem, so is this a factual dispute about what Smith said about what someone may have observed at the OU Inn?



From what I've been told the incidents referred to in the prez's letter are just the tip of the iceberg. If this goes to court, or if there is a settlement, the facts will come out and this will get even more messy. As others with more legal training then I have said, under Ohio FOI law there is no way that the university can keep this all under wraps. The university appears to have been trying a "modified, limited hangout." If they had remembered their watergate history they would have known that often doesn't work out too well.


Since you seem to be in the know, and you don't have to get specific, but is everything that has been reported so far everything that you've been told? Checking off boxes essentially? I'm only asking because in small towns like Athens, rumors spread like wildfire and it's hard to tell what's true and what isn't. I'd be curious to know if what you've heard is dead on with what has been reported so far (from either OU or Smith's attorney).
Back to Top
  
Mike Coleman
Administrator



Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 2,002

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 7:05:47 PM 
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:
Mike Coleman wrote:


Four out of five clauses that the university used to prove cause involve alcohol. If people are talking about it, ask them lol.


OJ Simpson was charged with burglary in 2007, too. Doesn't mean those are the allegations about him people should be focused on.


How did that case work out for the accusers, I forget.


(Just kidding...I get your point, but that was a fastball down the middle)
Back to Top
  
Mike Coleman
Administrator



Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 2,002

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 7:43:52 PM 
WOUB reports on relationship policies. Interesting read.

https://woub.org/2025/12/18/ohio-university-fires-brian-s... /
Back to Top
  
Cats5
General User

Member Since: 6/14/2017
Location: Chillicothe, OH
Post Count: 1,389

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 8:17:10 PM 
Mike Coleman wrote:
WOUB reports on relationship policies. Interesting read.

https://woub.org/2025/12/18/ohio-university-fires-brian-s... /


I have a feeling the school might’ve jumped the gun a little.
Back to Top
  
boydhallbobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 286

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 8:42:08 PM 
GoCats105 wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
Bitchy Incognito wrote:
Could this come down to a court determining if OU's employment clauses and its enforcement of them were sufficiently well-crafted to sustain scrutiny with regard to vagueness and/or adhesion to current pubic standards? I suppose case law could also figure in.

Additional reading:

https://law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-is-...

https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?...

Agree that the 41-year-old would not seem to be a problem, so is this a factual dispute about what Smith said about what someone may have observed at the OU Inn?



From what I've been told the incidents referred to in the prez's letter are just the tip of the iceberg. If this goes to court, or if there is a settlement, the facts will come out and this will get even more messy. As others with more legal training then I have said, under Ohio FOI law there is no way that the university can keep this all under wraps. The university appears to have been trying a "modified, limited hangout." If they had remembered their watergate history they would have known that often doesn't work out too well.


Since you seem to be in the know, and you don't have to get specific, but is everything that has been reported so far everything that you've been told? Checking off boxes essentially? I'm only asking because in small towns like Athens, rumors spread like wildfire and it's hard to tell what's true and what isn't. I'd be curious to know if what you've heard is dead on with what has been reported so far (from either OU or Smith's attorney).


Also, why wouldn't the University put all the reasons why he was being terminated in his termination letter? Why would they just include "the tip of the iceberg?"

Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,751

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 8:51:37 PM 
boydhallbobcat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
Bitchy Incognito wrote:
Could this come down to a court determining if OU's employment clauses and its enforcement of them were sufficiently well-crafted to sustain scrutiny with regard to vagueness and/or adhesion to current pubic standards? I suppose case law could also figure in.

Additional reading:

https://law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-is-...

https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?...

Agree that the 41-year-old would not seem to be a problem, so is this a factual dispute about what Smith said about what someone may have observed at the OU Inn?



From what I've been told the incidents referred to in the prez's letter are just the tip of the iceberg. If this goes to court, or if there is a settlement, the facts will come out and this will get even more messy. As others with more legal training then I have said, under Ohio FOI law there is no way that the university can keep this all under wraps. The university appears to have been trying a "modified, limited hangout." If they had remembered their watergate history they would have known that often doesn't work out too well.


Since you seem to be in the know, and you don't have to get specific, but is everything that has been reported so far everything that you've been told? Checking off boxes essentially? I'm only asking because in small towns like Athens, rumors spread like wildfire and it's hard to tell what's true and what isn't. I'd be curious to know if what you've heard is dead on with what has been reported so far (from either OU or Smith's attorney).


Also, why wouldn't the University put all the reasons why he was being terminated in his termination letter? Why would they just include "the tip of the iceberg?"



That's a very good question. My guess is too many lawyers and too few PR people involved in the decison making.


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
DC_United47
General User

Member Since: 7/23/2022
Post Count: 100

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 8:57:13 PM 
RufusCat09 wrote:
Seeing a few players post about hiring Hauser so at least that's good.

https://x.com/DonovanWalkerr/status/2001382993529835559

https://x.com/MichaelTayl0r22/status/2001384694768665041


I’m not usually a “let the players pick their coach” guy but in this era if you DON’T then the players are gone…and then you have to pay to get new players….so maybe we should just “hire Hauser” like the said!
Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,751

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 9:00:30 PM 
GoCats105 wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
Bitchy Incognito wrote:
Could this come down to a court determining if OU's employment clauses and its enforcement of them were sufficiently well-crafted to sustain scrutiny with regard to vagueness and/or adhesion to current pubic standards? I suppose case law could also figure in.

Additional reading:

https://law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-is-...

https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?...

Agree that the 41-year-old would not seem to be a problem, so is this a factual dispute about what Smith said about what someone may have observed at the OU Inn?



From what I've been told the incidents referred to in the prez's letter are just the tip of the iceberg. If this goes to court, or if there is a settlement, the facts will come out and this will get even more messy. As others with more legal training then I have said, under Ohio FOI law there is no way that the university can keep this all under wraps. The university appears to have been trying a "modified, limited hangout." If they had remembered their watergate history they would have known that often doesn't work out too well.


Since you seem to be in the know, and you don't have to get specific, but is everything that has been reported so far everything that you've been told? Checking off boxes essentially? I'm only asking because in small towns like Athens, rumors spread like wildfire and it's hard to tell what's true and what isn't. I'd be curious to know if what you've heard is dead on with what has been reported so far (from either OU or Smith's attorney).


So far everything I've heard over the last few months from reliable sources has been consistent with what's been released so far, but why the University is allowing it to all drip out so slowly is beyond me. Another poster used the analogy of "ripping off the bandaid." I think that's appropriate -- endure a little intense pain and have it over with; rather than having continuing pain over, weeks, months, or even years. In fairness, in my reflective moments, I think the university is trying to tell Smith that he should go away quietly by not revealing everything at once, but he doesn't seem to be getting the hint.


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
Mike Coleman
Administrator



Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 2,002

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 9:02:51 PM 
OhioCatFan wrote:
boydhallbobcat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
Bitchy Incognito wrote:
Could this come down to a court determining if OU's employment clauses and its enforcement of them were sufficiently well-crafted to sustain scrutiny with regard to vagueness and/or adhesion to current pubic standards? I suppose case law could also figure in.

Additional reading:

https://law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-is-...

https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?...

Agree that the 41-year-old would not seem to be a problem, so is this a factual dispute about what Smith said about what someone may have observed at the OU Inn?



From what I've been told the incidents referred to in the prez's letter are just the tip of the iceberg. If this goes to court, or if there is a settlement, the facts will come out and this will get even more messy. As others with more legal training then I have said, under Ohio FOI law there is no way that the university can keep this all under wraps. The university appears to have been trying a "modified, limited hangout." If they had remembered their watergate history they would have known that often doesn't work out too well.


Since you seem to be in the know, and you don't have to get specific, but is everything that has been reported so far everything that you've been told? Checking off boxes essentially? I'm only asking because in small towns like Athens, rumors spread like wildfire and it's hard to tell what's true and what isn't. I'd be curious to know if what you've heard is dead on with what has been reported so far (from either OU or Smith's attorney).


Also, why wouldn't the University put all the reasons why he was being terminated in his termination letter? Why would they just include "the tip of the iceberg?"



That's a very good question. My guess is too many lawyers and too few PR people involved in the decison making.


Perhaps they were in a rush to get him out the door in order to have a new coach in by the time the portal opens, and further claims had yet to be fully investigated. Even if not, they definitely felt this was enough to proceed.
Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,751

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 9:05:38 PM 
Mike Coleman wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
boydhallbobcat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
Bitchy Incognito wrote:
Could this come down to a court determining if OU's employment clauses and its enforcement of them were sufficiently well-crafted to sustain scrutiny with regard to vagueness and/or adhesion to current pubic standards? I suppose case law could also figure in.

Additional reading:

https://law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-is-...

https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?...

Agree that the 41-year-old would not seem to be a problem, so is this a factual dispute about what Smith said about what someone may have observed at the OU Inn?



From what I've been told the incidents referred to in the prez's letter are just the tip of the iceberg. If this goes to court, or if there is a settlement, the facts will come out and this will get even more messy. As others with more legal training then I have said, under Ohio FOI law there is no way that the university can keep this all under wraps. The university appears to have been trying a "modified, limited hangout." If they had remembered their watergate history they would have known that often doesn't work out too well.


Since you seem to be in the know, and you don't have to get specific, but is everything that has been reported so far everything that you've been told? Checking off boxes essentially? I'm only asking because in small towns like Athens, rumors spread like wildfire and it's hard to tell what's true and what isn't. I'd be curious to know if what you've heard is dead on with what has been reported so far (from either OU or Smith's attorney).


Also, why wouldn't the University put all the reasons why he was being terminated in his termination letter? Why would they just include "the tip of the iceberg?"



That's a very good question. My guess is too many lawyers and too few PR people involved in the decison making.


Perhaps they were in a rush to get him out the door in order to have a new coach in by the time the portal opens, and further claims had yet to be fully investigated. Even if not, they definitely felt this was enough to proceed.


That's also possibly a factor, IMHO.


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
mid70sbobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 812

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 10:23:08 PM 
OhioCatFan wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
Bitchy Incognito wrote:
Could this come down to a court determining if OU's employment clauses and its enforcement of them were sufficiently well-crafted to sustain scrutiny with regard to vagueness and/or adhesion to current pubic standards? I suppose case law could also figure in.

Additional reading:

https://law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-is-...

https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?...

Agree that the 41-year-old would not seem to be a problem, so is this a factual dispute about what Smith said about what someone may have observed at the OU Inn?



From what I've been told the incidents referred to in the prez's letter are just the tip of the iceberg. If this goes to court, or if there is a settlement, the facts will come out and this will get even more messy. As others with more legal training then I have said, under Ohio FOI law there is no way that the university can keep this all under wraps. The university appears to have been trying a "modified, limited hangout." If they had remembered their watergate history they would have known that often doesn't work out too well.


Since you seem to be in the know, and you don't have to get specific, but is everything that has been reported so far everything that you've been told? Checking off boxes essentially? I'm only asking because in small towns like Athens, rumors spread like wildfire and it's hard to tell what's true and what isn't. I'd be curious to know if what you've heard is dead on with what has been reported so far (from either OU or Smith's attorney).


So far everything I've heard over the last few months from reliable sources has been consistent with what's been released so far, but why the University is allowing it to all drip out so slowly is beyond me. Another poster used the analogy of "ripping off the bandaid." I think that's appropriate -- endure a little intense pain and have it over with; rather than having continuing pain over, weeks, months, or even years. In fairness, in my reflective moments, I think the university is trying to tell Smith that he should go away quietly by not revealing everything at once, but he doesn't seem to be getting the hint.


To be honest I hope Smith and his attorney pursue a lawsuit. He was cited for alcohol use on university property yet Gonzalez' husband provided in on at least one occasion. And as far as I know a sexual relationship with anyone of legal age is not a crime. Instead of maybe hundreds or even thousands of people being aware of this "horrible" behavior now the entire USA and worldwide will see the dysfunctionality that exists at our alma mater. So, we may as well terminate any of the assistant coaches who also drank alcohol on University property with Smith.

Last Edited: 12/18/2025 10:24:30 PM by mid70sbobcat

Back to Top
  
Mike Coleman
Administrator



Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 2,002

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 10:32:19 PM 
mid70sbobcat wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
Bitchy Incognito wrote:
Could this come down to a court determining if OU's employment clauses and its enforcement of them were sufficiently well-crafted to sustain scrutiny with regard to vagueness and/or adhesion to current pubic standards? I suppose case law could also figure in.

Additional reading:

https://law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-is-...

https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?...

Agree that the 41-year-old would not seem to be a problem, so is this a factual dispute about what Smith said about what someone may have observed at the OU Inn?



From what I've been told the incidents referred to in the prez's letter are just the tip of the iceberg. If this goes to court, or if there is a settlement, the facts will come out and this will get even more messy. As others with more legal training then I have said, under Ohio FOI law there is no way that the university can keep this all under wraps. The university appears to have been trying a "modified, limited hangout." If they had remembered their watergate history they would have known that often doesn't work out too well.


Since you seem to be in the know, and you don't have to get specific, but is everything that has been reported so far everything that you've been told? Checking off boxes essentially? I'm only asking because in small towns like Athens, rumors spread like wildfire and it's hard to tell what's true and what isn't. I'd be curious to know if what you've heard is dead on with what has been reported so far (from either OU or Smith's attorney).


So far everything I've heard over the last few months from reliable sources has been consistent with what's been released so far, but why the University is allowing it to all drip out so slowly is beyond me. Another poster used the analogy of "ripping off the bandaid." I think that's appropriate -- endure a little intense pain and have it over with; rather than having continuing pain over, weeks, months, or even years. In fairness, in my reflective moments, I think the university is trying to tell Smith that he should go away quietly by not revealing everything at once, but he doesn't seem to be getting the hint.


To be honest I hope Smith and his attorney pursue a lawsuit. He was cited for alcohol use on university property yet Gonzalez' husband provided in on at least one occasion. And as far as I know a sexual relationship with anyone of legal age is not a crime. Instead of maybe hundreds or even thousands of people being aware of this "horrible" behavior now the entire USA and worldwide will see the dysfunctionality that exists at our alma mater. So, we may as well terminate any of the assistant coaches who also drank alcohol on University property with Smith.



An enterprising reporter might submit an FOIA request for the personnel files of the other staff members to see if they were also reprimanded for Bourbongate.
Back to Top
  
mid70sbobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 812

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 10:43:55 PM 
Mike Coleman wrote:
mid70sbobcat wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
Bitchy Incognito wrote:
Could this come down to a court determining if OU's employment clauses and its enforcement of them were sufficiently well-crafted to sustain scrutiny with regard to vagueness and/or adhesion to current pubic standards? I suppose case law could also figure in.

Additional reading:

https://law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-is-...

https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?...

Agree that the 41-year-old would not seem to be a problem, so is this a factual dispute about what Smith said about what someone may have observed at the OU Inn?



From what I've been told the incidents referred to in the prez's letter are just the tip of the iceberg. If this goes to court, or if there is a settlement, the facts will come out and this will get even more messy. As others with more legal training then I have said, under Ohio FOI law there is no way that the university can keep this all under wraps. The university appears to have been trying a "modified, limited hangout." If they had remembered their watergate history they would have known that often doesn't work out too well.


Since you seem to be in the know, and you don't have to get specific, but is everything that has been reported so far everything that you've been told? Checking off boxes essentially? I'm only asking because in small towns like Athens, rumors spread like wildfire and it's hard to tell what's true and what isn't. I'd be curious to know if what you've heard is dead on with what has been reported so far (from either OU or Smith's attorney).


So far everything I've heard over the last few months from reliable sources has been consistent with what's been released so far, but why the University is allowing it to all drip out so slowly is beyond me. Another poster used the analogy of "ripping off the bandaid." I think that's appropriate -- endure a little intense pain and have it over with; rather than having continuing pain over, weeks, months, or even years. In fairness, in my reflective moments, I think the university is trying to tell Smith that he should go away quietly by not revealing everything at once, but he doesn't seem to be getting the hint.


To be honest I hope Smith and his attorney pursue a lawsuit. He was cited for alcohol use on university property yet Gonzalez' husband provided in on at least one occasion. And as far as I know a sexual relationship with anyone of legal age is not a crime. Instead of maybe hundreds or even thousands of people being aware of this "horrible" behavior now the entire USA and worldwide will see the dysfunctionality that exists at our alma mater. So, we may as well terminate any of the assistant coaches who also drank alcohol on University property with Smith.



An enterprising reporter might submit an FOIA request for the personnel files of the other staff members to see if they were also reprimanded for Bourbongate.


With my Undergrad degree from Ohio in Probability & statistics I'd bet against any of the remaining coaches being called on the carpet for this kind of alcohol abuse. Long live the CI!
Back to Top
  
Mike Coleman
Administrator



Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 2,002

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 10:51:30 PM 
Obi Wan Kenobi speaks:
https://x.com/drridpath/status/2001759965896200503?s=46&t...
Back to Top
  
Mike Coleman
Administrator



Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 2,002

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 11:17:53 PM 
For any Posties or WOUB peeps lurking here, quote Ridpath now. I've been doing this shit for 35 years.

https://www.ohio.edu/experts/expert/b-david-ridpath

Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,751

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/18/2025 11:45:57 PM 
Mike Coleman wrote:
For any Posties or WOUB peeps lurking here, quote Ridpath now. I've been doing this shit for 35 years.

https://www.ohio.edu/experts/expert/b-david-ridpath



This is probably going to force the university's hand, and they will have to rip off the band-aid. This is a direct result of their limited, modified hangout. This approach, championed by my distant relative H. R. Haldeman, seems to be alive and well at OHIO.


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
Mike Coleman
Administrator



Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 2,002

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/19/2025 12:20:12 AM 
Isn't Ridpath the guy who brought down Bobby Pruett?

His emails are in the inbox or OU students. OU says he is an expert.

Seriously, has he ever been wrong?

https://www.ourmidland.com/news/article/Ex-Marshall-Direc...
Back to Top
  
SBH
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,686

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Smith has been fired
   Posted: 12/19/2025 7:45:24 AM 
Disappointed in all parties here. It's becoming increasingly difficult to be a college sports fan.

Disappointed, too, that no one has linked to the classic Seinfeld scene where George Costanza is confronted by his boss for having sex with the cleaning lady, on his desk. "Was that wrong? Should I not have done that? 'cause, I gotta tell you, if there were any mention of that rule in the employee manual..." This was my immediate thought when I heard the affair was with an undergrad.

Stupid on Smith's part. Poor decision making by the student. But a really bad look for the administration. Did anyone ever sit down with Smith and urge him to clean up his behavior...people are talking, etc.? If this goes to court, it's going to be highly embarrassing.

Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  101 - 125  of 188 Posts
Jump to Page:  < Previous    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8    Next >
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Copyright ©2026 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties