Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Maybe Conference Realignment Isn’t Over
Page: 2 of 4
Bobcat Love
General User
BL
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 1,193
BL
mail
Bobcat Love
Long Train Runnin' wrote:expand_more
Any deal for Kansas means they would probably have to take K-State, too.
This is 100% false.
SVAC83
General User
SVAC83
Member Since: 10/1/2019
Post Count: 144
SVAC83
mail
SVAC83
after doing a little bit of thinking and investigating. I think the big 10 definetley wants to stay in a foot race with the SEC. The following list of schools i think would be reasonable targets

iowa state and kansas is already being talked about but this would be my least favorite but maybe most likely.
Why not go after Duke and north carolina and open up the south a little bit and extend the foot print. ACC schools can easily be drawn away because of money paid out by conference.
or if texas A&M really wants away from texas and oklahoma why not lure them and Missouri to the big 10.

The other team that makes sense is pitt. Even though i thought boston college i am not sure that makes sense.

The last option would be go take a couple of pac 12 teams. But i dont think this realignment is just going to be teams eating up the big 12 teams. The ACC TV deals suck.
SVAC83
General User
SVAC83
Member Since: 10/1/2019
Post Count: 144
SVAC83
mail
SVAC83
yes kansas and kansas state is not a package deal. But it is my understanding that iowa and iowa state would need some legislative action to actually be in the same league. The only two state schools i know to be attached is virginia and virginia tech. this happened during last round of expansion.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
P
mail
Pataskala
Suppose....All this winds up dissolving the B12 -- maybe not right away, but in a few years. (A conference has to have at least eight teams and without Okla and Texas the B12 would be at the minimum.) A defunct B12 would leave nine conferences: four "P"s and the G5. Under the new CFP proposal, the playoff field would be the top six rated conference champs and the top six rated non-champs. Assuming this is adopted without alteration, that means at least two G5 conference champs would be in the field every year. Unless, of course, they change the format again.

We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.

Athens
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,496
mail
Athens
Frank should get on the phone with the SEC and tell them if they ain't sure about Texas there is a second OU...

Most Memorable Bobcat Events Attended
2010 97-83 win over Georgetown in NCAA 1st round
2012 45-13 victory over ULM in the Independence Bowl
2015 34-3 drubbing of Fiami @ Peden with 25,086 fans
2023 10-7 near shutout of Iowa State @ Solich Field
2025 17-10 defeat of WVU @ Peden in front of 26,740
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,861
GC105
mail
GoCats105
Beginning to think this move by Texas and OU was just a ploy to get more revenue from the Big XII. "Oh you're not gonna pay us more, fine we'll go elsewhere." Already seeing talks of Texas and OU getting $100M while the rest of the conference members get $25M. I'm not sure how that is legal or why the rest of the league would approve it, but I would not be shocked if that's the final decision in all this. West Virginia is being rumored to leave the conference no matter which decision is reached.

Boise State did something similar with the Mountain West when they threated to leave for the Big East/AAC, and the rest of the conference despises them for it.

All in all, if there is another round of realignment I just hope the MAC does something this time around to strengthen the conference rather than standing pat. Wishful thinking, I know. C-USA is dead weight, but adding a couple schools from there within the relative footprint would be huge, I think. Marshall and Western Kentucky makes so much sense and I will die on this hill. If not one of those, Army. Please by god make a phone call to Army. Unless the AAC nabs them when Cincinnati and Memphis jump ship...
Last Edited: 7/26/2021 8:56:55 AM by GoCats105
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
P
mail
Pataskala
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
Beginning to think this move by Texas and OU was just a ploy to get more revenue from the Big XII. "Oh you're not gonna pay us more, fine we'll go elsewhere." Already seeing talks of Texas and OU getting $100M while the rest of the conference members get $25M. I'm not sure how that is legal or why the rest of the league would approve it, but I would not be shocked if that's the final decision in all this. West Virginia is being rumored to leave the conference no matter which decision is reached.

Boise State did something similar with the Mountain West when they threated to leave for the Big East/AAC, and the rest of the conference despises them for it.

All in all, if there is another round of realignment I just hope the MAC does something this time around to strengthen the conference rather than standing pat. Wishful thinking, I know. C-USA is dead weight, but adding a couple schools from there within the relative footprint would be huge, I think. Marshall and Western Kentucky makes so much sense and I will die on this hill. If not one of those, Army. Please by god make a phone call to Army. Unless the AAC nabs them when Cincinnati and Memphis jump ship...
Don't expect Army to be in the same conference as Navy. They want their game to be the last of the regular season, the week after the conference championships. That can't happen if they're in the same conference because their game could have a bearing on who's in the conference championship game. Now if Navy were to go to the B12 (maybe to help keep WVU from leaving), then Army's a real possible for the AAC.

We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.

Last Edited: 7/26/2021 10:15:44 AM by Pataskala
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,917
mail
OUcats82
Random thoughts:

-Pitt has not moved the needle much in the two big sports since joining the ACC. Don't know if the Big 10 would want them, especially with Penn State already at the table putting up a lot of resistance. I would guess the Pittsburgh/Western PA market would not increase much beyond what the Lions already pull.

Pitt does have the AAU feather in their cap, though.

-If Oklahoma and Texas do move to the SEC, the Big 12 better move quick to stabilize if they don't want to implode-the domino effect may be too much to overcome if other schools are lured away.

Adding schools from the AAC might be their best hand, with maybe Cincinnati and Memphis, along with Houston, SMU, in attempt to cobble some old Southwest Conference nostalgia. Not sure how much loyalty they feel to WVU, but having some teams a bit further east could keep them from shopping around. Would think Boise or BYU may be of interest, too. Already having two faith-based schools in conference makes for a smoother path for BYU as long as the non-Sunday games stipulation isn't a deal killer (their basketball conference championship game is on a Saturday currently)

-I don't see the ACC wanting anything to do with WVU. Minimal media gains and I frankly think most of the powers that be of the conference (and the fan bases, right or wrong) likely look down on the school.

Notre Dame would likely be the most likely target given their standing membership in the conference for all other sports, along with the cluster of ACC games they are already playing for football.

Only scenario I see any other new members being invited is if the SEC or Big 10 peel off existing teams.

Anything is possible in the current landscape. The chasm will continue to grow between the P5 and G5 teams. I can see some P5 teams losing their seats at the table and a handful of G5 schools getting pulled up.

Ohio-The State University

BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,860
BTC
mail
BillyTheCat
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
I've only lived in Austin for a couple years, but I can fully declare that this would require the SEC treating Texas like the snowflakes they are and making them feel special by kissing their collective bums. And call me crazy, but I don't think the SEC would ever do that; they'd probably laugh about it, then take Oklahoma State out of spite.

This doesn't even include the Texas A&M opinion or the legalities behind buying out the Longhorn Network contract, which runs through...Googles real fast...2031.
Looks like you are wiffing on that. However, there may be enough teams in the SEC (4) who may nix this.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,861
GC105
mail
GoCats105
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
I've only lived in Austin for a couple years, but I can fully declare that this would require the SEC treating Texas like the snowflakes they are and making them feel special by kissing their collective bums. And call me crazy, but I don't think the SEC would ever do that; they'd probably laugh about it, then take Oklahoma State out of spite.

This doesn't even include the Texas A&M opinion or the legalities behind buying out the Longhorn Network contract, which runs through...Googles real fast...2031.
Looks like you are wiffing on that. However, there may be enough teams in the SEC (4) who may nix this.
I've once again underestimated the size of greed in college athletics. However I still stand by my statement that Texas thinks they're better than they are.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,861
GC105
mail
GoCats105
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,917
mail
OUcats82
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
Saw the same basic message on ESPN this morning.

Will be interested in watching what other maneuvers are put into motion.

Ohio-The State University

rpbobcat
General User
R
Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,670
R
mail
rpbobcat
OUcats82 wrote:expand_more
Saw the same basic message on ESPN this morning.

Will be interested in watching what other maneuvers are put into motion.
Listening to the pundits on sports talk radio, they feel Texas and Oklahoma becoming members of the SEC won't take very long.

They also fell these are just the first 2 dominos to fall in what will be a massive conference shake up.
Last Edited: 7/26/2021 12:41:57 PM by rpbobcat
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,977
mail
OhioCatFan
rpbobcat wrote:expand_more
Saw the same basic message on ESPN this morning.

Will be interested in watching what other maneuvers are put into motion.
Listening to the pundits on sports talk radio, they feel Texas and Oklahoma becoming members of the SEC won't take very long.

They also fell these are just the first 2 dominos to fall in what will be a massive conference shake up.
So they pay off those obligations and move before 2025?

The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,615
mail
The Optimist
If the Big 12 doesn't collapse, maybe they would add Cincy and Memphis. Would be good for WVU and that'd be an even better hoops conference than it was...

I've seen crazier things happen.
rpbobcat
General User
R
Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,670
R
mail
rpbobcat
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
So they pay off those obligations and move before 2025?
That seems to be the consensus.

Between the schools, and/or the conference no one thinks paying, to get out early, is an issue.
SVAC83
General User
SVAC83
Member Since: 10/1/2019
Post Count: 144
SVAC83
mail
SVAC83
I think them actually joining the conference may take longer then people are thinking. I only say that because i heard on one station that the big 10 and ACC were both going to to talk to texas and oklahoma. About joining their conferences. so this may end up going to the highest bidder.

Also hearing the big 10 may bethinking go big and go home as they may off florida state, clemson, USC, arizona, kansas iowa state and oklahoma state. They have the next expiring TV contract they could try to just go to 20 teams right now.
rpbobcat
General User
R
Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,670
R
mail
rpbobcat
SVAC83 wrote:expand_more
I think them actually joining the conference may take longer then people are thinking. I only say that because i heard on one station that the big 10 and ACC were both going to to talk to texas and oklahoma. About joining their conferences. so this may end up going to the highest bidder.

Also hearing the big 10 may bethinking go big and go home as they may off florida state, clemson, USC, arizona, kansas iowa state and oklahoma state. They have the next expiring TV contract they could try to just go to 20 teams right now.
Don't know how serious it is, but I saw one report that the SEC also has their eyes on OSU and Mich.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,861
GC105
mail
GoCats105
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
Saw the same basic message on ESPN this morning.

Will be interested in watching what other maneuvers are put into motion.
Listening to the pundits on sports talk radio, they feel Texas and Oklahoma becoming members of the SEC won't take very long.

They also fell these are just the first 2 dominos to fall in what will be a massive conference shake up.
So they pay off those obligations and move before 2025?
It's like divorcing your spouse but agreeing to live in the same house for the next four years. Sorry, but I can't see that happening. The attorneys will make sure all parties come to an agreement that suits everyone. My guess is the SEC (or whereever these two end up) are going to have to write a hefty check to the Big XII.
rpbobcat
General User
R
Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,670
R
mail
rpbobcat
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
It's like divorcing your spouse but agreeing to live in the same house for the next four years. Sorry, but I can't see that happening. The attorneys will make sure all parties come to an agreement that suits everyone. My guess is the SEC (or whereever these two end up) are going to have to write a hefty check to the Big XII.
Big question, what schools will object to Texas and Oklahoma.

Texas AM&M and Arkansas seem possible.

Same with Mizzu.
They have issues with Texas.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,615
mail
The Optimist
rpbobcat wrote:expand_more
I think them actually joining the conference may take longer then people are thinking. I only say that because i heard on one station that the big 10 and ACC were both going to to talk to texas and oklahoma. About joining their conferences. so this may end up going to the highest bidder.

Also hearing the big 10 may bethinking go big and go home as they may off florida state, clemson, USC, arizona, kansas iowa state and oklahoma state. They have the next expiring TV contract they could try to just go to 20 teams right now.
Don't know how serious it is, but I saw one report that the SEC also has their eyes on OSU and Mich.
I saw that too. I think I put that in the category of "rampant speculation" but I guess it's plausible. At that point, the SEC is essentially breaking off from the rest of college football.

I've seen crazier things happen.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,861
GC105
mail
GoCats105
rpbobcat wrote:expand_more
It's like divorcing your spouse but agreeing to live in the same house for the next four years. Sorry, but I can't see that happening. The attorneys will make sure all parties come to an agreement that suits everyone. My guess is the SEC (or whereever these two end up) are going to have to write a hefty check to the Big XII.
Big question, what schools will object to Texas and Oklahoma.

Texas AM&M and Arkansas seem possible.

Same with Mizzu.
They have issues with Texas.
The only other school besides those three I could see having an issue is LSU. They already hate Texas A&M so adding another Texas school? I don't know though. It's gonna be hard to get the votes to block this.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
M279801
mail
mf279801
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
It's like divorcing your spouse but agreeing to live in the same house for the next four years. Sorry, but I can't see that happening. The attorneys will make sure all parties come to an agreement that suits everyone. My guess is the SEC (or whereever these two end up) are going to have to write a hefty check to the Big XII.
Big question, what schools will object to Texas and Oklahoma.

Texas AM&M and Arkansas seem possible.

Same with Mizzu.
They have issues with Texas.
The only other school besides those three I could see having an issue is LSU. They already hate Texas A&M so adding another Texas school? I don't know though. It's gonna be hard to get the votes to block this.
Pretty sure it will be either 14-0 or 13-1(TAMU) for both Texas and Oklahoma’s SEC membership. Once it’s clear they have the votes to get in, everyone will vote yes for it.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
M279801
mail
mf279801
SVAC83 wrote:expand_more
Also hearing the big 10 may bethinking go big and go home as they may off florida state, clemson, USC, arizona, kansas iowa state and oklahoma state. They have the next expiring TV contract they could try to just go to 20 teams right now.
In the absence of a named source, this sounds like absurd message board/Twitter rumors to me
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,861
GC105
mail
GoCats105
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
Also hearing the big 10 may bethinking go big and go home as they may off florida state, clemson, USC, arizona, kansas iowa state and oklahoma state. They have the next expiring TV contract they could try to just go to 20 teams right now.
In the absence of a named source, this sounds like absurd message board/Twitter rumors to me
If OU and Texas go to the SEC and make their total number 16, you can almost guarantee the Big Ten will follow suit. I'm not 100% sure who they could get that would move the needle as much as those two, but won't be shocked when it happens.

BTW the rumored fee for OU and Texas to leave the Big XII is $75-$80M. That's an absurd amount of money that they're just willing to part ways with. My god.
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 97
MAC News Links
Saturday,
Who's Online

There are 104 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com

103 Guests
1 Registered User: