Welcome Guest! Create an Account login email: password: remember me: BASKETBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting FOOTBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting MESSAGE BOARD Message Home - Ohio Basketball - Ohio Basketball Recruiting - The O Zone - Ohio Football - Ohio Football Recruiting - Ohio Volleyball - Ohio Baseball - Ohio Olympic Sports... - General OU Discussion... - Website Feedback... - Posting Policy Edit My Profile Private Messages Logout CHAT LINKS site searchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp Message Board BobcatAttack.com Message Board Ohio Basketball Topic:  Rule change Topic:  Rule change Author Message Pataskala General User Member Since: 7/8/2010 Location: At least six feet away from anybody else Post Count: 9,365 Status: Offline     Rule change    Posted: 3/29/2015 7:12:42 PM  Here's a rule that should be changed. A Duke player leaped out of bounds to save a ball and knocked it off a Gonzaga player who was already out of bounds. The ball was awarded to Duke. Since the Gonzaga player had established his position out of bounds, he should be considered part of the out-of-bounds area, same as the goal stanchion or the scorer's table or anybody sitting on the bench. We will get by. We will get by. We will get by. We will survive. Back to Top bobcat695 General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Parkersburg, WV Post Count: 1,345 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/29/2015 7:59:24 PM  Couldn't disagree more. That was a great play. 10 players on the court, all in play. "You can't un-fist a fist pump." - Saul Phillips 1/24/15 Back to Top OhioCatFan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Athens, OH Post Count: 14,783 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/29/2015 11:21:55 PM  I could not agree more Pataskala. In fact, I thought that was already the rule. It seems so obvious to me that once a player is out-of-bounds, he is basically part of the out-of-bounds area. I don't recall ever seeing a play like that called the way it was in this case. I just thought the refs made a big mistake. Now, you tell me that's the rule. It's kind of totally baffling to me. I'm don't recall in any pickup games I've played ever seeing a player interpret the rule that way. The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA "It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right." Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org Back to Top UpSan Bobcat General User Member Since: 8/30/2005 Location: Upper Sandusky, OH Post Count: 3,812 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/30/2015 8:12:56 AM  Seems like a simple call. If a player is out-of-bounds and touches a ball that previously was in play, the ball is out off of that player. Back to Top OUVan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Bethesda, MD Post Count: 5,580 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/30/2015 8:35:54 AM  Pataskala wrote: Here's a rule that should be changed. A Duke player leaped out of bounds to save a ball and knocked it off a Gonzaga player who was already out of bounds. The ball was awarded to Duke. Since the Gonzaga player had established his position out of bounds, he should be considered part of the out-of-bounds area, same as the goal stanchion or the scorer's table or anybody sitting on the bench. I disagree. Why would he be a non-factor just because he's out of bounds? Back to Top Deciduous Forest Cat General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Ohio Post Count: 4,474 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/30/2015 10:18:02 AM  OUVan wrote: Pataskala wrote: Here's a rule that should be changed. A Duke player leaped out of bounds to save a ball and knocked it off a Gonzaga player who was already out of bounds. The ball was awarded to Duke. Since the Gonzaga player had established his position out of bounds, he should be considered part of the out-of-bounds area, same as the goal stanchion or the scorer's table or anybody sitting on the bench. I disagree. Why would he be a non-factor just because he's out of bounds? Exactly. if someone was on the bench, that's a different story. If they are checked into the game, then tey are part of the action, and if you're the first one to touch the ball OOB, then it's off you. If you don't want that to happen, then stay in bounds. Back to Top Pataskala General User Member Since: 7/8/2010 Location: At least six feet away from anybody else Post Count: 9,365 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/30/2015 11:24:25 AM  The ball would've hit out of bounds if it hadn't hit the other player who was face down on the floor, out of bounds. Shouldn't get a break for that. We will get by. We will get by. We will get by. We will survive. Back to Top OUVan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Bethesda, MD Post Count: 5,580 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/30/2015 12:01:43 PM  Pataskala wrote: The ball would've hit out of bounds if it hadn't hit the other player who was face down on the floor, out of bounds. Shouldn't get a break for that. If the player hadn't been on the ground the Duke player wouldn't have thrown it there. It wasn't a break. It was a smart play. I don't see the difference between that and throwing it off a player's legs. Back to Top Deciduous Forest Cat General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Ohio Post Count: 4,474 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/30/2015 12:10:13 PM  Pataskala wrote: The ball would've hit out of bounds if it hadn't hit the other player who was face down on the floor, out of bounds. Shouldn't get a break for that. Then he should get up and get back in the game. Back to Top Toast General User Member Since: 3/11/2015 Location: Athens, OH Post Count: 178 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/30/2015 1:25:58 PM  Didn't only happen in the Duke game. Couldn't agree more. Rule doesn't need changed. bobcat695 wrote: Couldn't disagree more. That was a great play. 10 players on the court, all in play. Ohio University-the original OU Back to Top Bobcatbob General User Member Since: 12/21/2004 Location: Coolville, OH Post Count: 1,347 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/30/2015 1:33:32 PM  If it makes it easier to accept, yesterday in the MSU - Louisville game, I'm pretty sure I saw a ball passed to and caught by a UL player who came (jumped) back in bounds but hadn't established position (landed). I always thought that was automatic out of bounds call. Apparently not so Same thing seems to happen with time line passes, an area where I see that strict definition of a plane eroding. Back to Top OUVan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Bethesda, MD Post Count: 5,580 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/30/2015 2:45:47 PM  Bobcatbob wrote: If it makes it easier to accept, yesterday in the MSU - Louisville game, I'm pretty sure I saw a ball passed to and caught by a UL player who came (jumped) back in bounds but hadn't established position (landed). I always thought that was automatic out of bounds call. Apparently not so Same thing seems to happen with time line passes, an area where I see that strict definition of a plane eroding. It should have been called. I thought a back-court violation should have been called against Duke yesterday in a similar situation. Back to Top perimeterpost General User Member Since: 7/6/2010 Post Count: 3,165 Status: Offline     RE: Rule change    Posted: 3/30/2015 3:09:42 PM  If a player standing out of bounds doesn't get called for touching the ball while standing out of bounds then there is no such thing as out of bounds. MY STATE. MY TEAM. Back to Top Showing Replies:   1 - 13  of 13 Posts Jump to Page:   1 View Other 'Ohio Basketball' Topics                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               WHO'S ONLINE There are 226 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com 226 Guests 0 Registered Users There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties