Welcome Guest! Create an Account login email: password: remember me: BASKETBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting FOOTBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting MESSAGE BOARD Message Home - Ohio Basketball - Ohio Basketball Recruiting - The O Zone - Ohio Football - Ohio Football Recruiting - Ohio Volleyball - Ohio Baseball - Ohio Olympic Sports... - General OU Discussion... - Website Feedback... - Posting Policy Edit My Profile Private Messages Logout CHAT LINKS site searchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp Message Board BobcatAttack.com Message Board Ohio Basketball Topic:  Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05 Topic:  Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05 Author Message Pataskala General User Member Since: 7/8/2010 Location: At least six feet away from anybody else Post Count: 9,365 Status: Offline     Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/14/2013 8:09:33 PM  What a way to lose a tourney game. Last Edited: 3/14/2013 8:10:27 PM by Pataskala We will get by. We will get by. We will get by. We will survive. Back to Top JSF General User Member Since: 1/29/2005 Location: Houston, TX Post Count: 6,554 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/14/2013 8:12:54 PM  Those refs are going to get a vacation. "Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season. My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8 Back to Top lovebobcat General User Member Since: 12/23/2004 Location: Cincinnati, OH Post Count: 521 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/14/2013 9:14:10 PM  Not that anyone's probably counting (but myself), but that hurts a little since Richmond counts as OU's best win. Should we win the MAC Tournament, we'll have to hope we do so over Akron (rather than Kent), because we otherwise might not have any wins over a school in the top 85 or so of the RPI. Not that Richmond was likely to move up much, unless it had won another game or two this week... Back to Top GraffZ06 General User Member Since: 1/5/2005 Location: Dayton, OH Post Count: 2,253 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/14/2013 9:35:31 PM  I was listening to the end of this Charlotte-Richmond game on the local Dayton radio station because Dayton-Butler was up next and they were doing their pre-game from courtside. The Dayton radio crew was beside themselves about how literally ridiculous the ending was. They basically stopped their pre-game and just did a play-by-play of the last minute or so. Charlotte had given up and put in their scrubs...only to win by hitting something like 12 free throws in the last 10 seconds? I know the Richmond coach finally had enough and got double tech'd and ejected. What a disaster. It was so bad the entire crowd in Brooklyn (most likely fairly neutral) was audibly booing the entire last 5 minutes or so of the game. Back to Top bornacatfan General User Member Since: 8/3/2006 Post Count: 5,716 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/14/2013 9:39:04 PM  JSF wrote: Those refs are going to get a vacation. reading the article it seems like a few of those techs are automatic by rule. Earlier vacation if they ignore the rule book. Coach just got his out of frustration. Salient point that Richmond chose to foul such an bad 3 ball shooting team. I would usually foul on that situation but not sure if the team shot that badly if I ould elect to follow common wisdom never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer..... The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game Back to Top medler General User Member Since: 12/21/2004 Location: Chicago, IL Post Count: 197 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/14/2013 9:42:48 PM  Factoid: Over/Under? 130 1/2 Let's GO HAWKS!  Back to Top JSF General User Member Since: 1/29/2005 Location: Houston, TX Post Count: 6,554 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/14/2013 9:45:15 PM  bornacatfan wrote: reading the article it seems like a few of those techs are automatic by rule. Earlier vacation if they ignore the rule book. Coach just got his out of frustration. True, though the original foul call on the free throw was borderline. The intentional call was unfathomable. "Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season. My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8 Back to Top OUVan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Bethesda, MD Post Count: 5,580 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/14/2013 10:05:44 PM  Just wondering but if they call a foul on that dead ball a technical why don't they call a technical when someone fouls before a ball is inbounded?  Back to Top athena General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Athens, OH Post Count: 710 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/15/2013 7:21:45 AM  Sounds like Bo was officiating. Back to Top Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame General User Member Since: 7/30/2010 Post Count: 4,102 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/15/2013 9:51:02 AM  bornacatfan wrote: JSF wrote: Those refs are going to get a vacation. reading the article it seems like a few of those techs are automatic by rule. Earlier vacation if they ignore the rule book. Coach just got his out of frustration. Salient point that Richmond chose to foul such an bad 3 ball shooting team. I would usually foul on that situation but not sure if the team shot that badly if I ould elect to follow common wisdom Charlotte was basically putting on a clinic in how to attack a match up zone. They were getting nothing but layups and shots in the paint, so they really had no need to shoot the 3. In that situiation, I'm with you. I was at the game, and they kept flashing a stat about how Charlotte hadn't made a 3. If I'm Mooney, I'm gonna make them make one in that situation.  That said, I get why Mooney flipped out, and I hate that sort of call. Henry got the inbound pass just beyond half court, and as the U of R player went to wrap him up, began a half court heave. Awarding 3 shots in that situation doesn't seem in line with the spirit of the rule.  Back to Top Pataskala General User Member Since: 7/8/2010 Location: At least six feet away from anybody else Post Count: 9,365 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/15/2013 11:45:56 AM  athena wrote: Sounds like Bo was officiating. No, but we might want to watch out for these guys in the future: Officials: Ken Clark, Bill Mccarthy, Jeff Janosik We will get by. We will get by. We will get by. We will survive. Back to Top RPKirtland General User Member Since: 10/14/2012 Location: San Jose, CA Post Count: 233 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/15/2013 12:31:01 PM  I'm always a fan of Virginia schools, and I've gone to see VCU-Richmond games the last couple of years. This cut deep. Went a little too far west, let's go SJ Earthquakes! Back to Top Brian Smith (No, not that one) General User Member Since: 2/3/2005 Post Count: 3,019 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/15/2013 12:58:10 PM  athena wrote: Sounds like Bo was officiating. I was thinking Mickey Gordon from "Forget Paris" Back to Top Eagle66 General User Member Since: 3/13/2005 Post Count: 1,329 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/15/2013 2:09:48 PM  Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote: bornacatfan wrote: JSF wrote: Those refs are going to get a vacation. reading the article it seems like a few of those techs are automatic by rule. Earlier vacation if they ignore the rule book. Coach just got his out of frustration. Salient point that Richmond chose to foul such an bad 3 ball shooting team. I would usually foul on that situation but not sure if the team shot that badly if I ould elect to follow common wisdom Charlotte was basically putting on a clinic in how to attack a match up zone. They were getting nothing but layups and shots in the paint, so they really had no need to shoot the 3. In that situiation, I'm with you. I was at the game, and they kept flashing a stat about how Charlotte hadn't made a 3. If I'm Mooney, I'm gonna make them make one in that situation. That said, I get why Mooney flipped out, and I hate that sort of call. Henry got the inbound pass just beyond half court, and as the U of R player went to wrap him up, began a half court heave. Awarding 3 shots in that situation doesn't seem in line with the spirit of the rule. I believe they called it flagrant as well so three and the ball. Back to Top Gangsta Pete General User Member Since: 3/20/2012 Location: Raleigh, NC Post Count: 62 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/15/2013 2:52:45 PM  OUVan wrote: Just wondering but if they call a foul on that dead ball a technical why don't they call a technical when someone fouls before a ball is inbounded?  If the player inbounding the ball has possession of the ball, it is considered a live ball, even though the clock isn't running.  "There's a difference between knowing the path and walking the path."  -Morpheus Back to Top bornacatfan General User Member Since: 8/3/2006 Post Count: 5,716 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/15/2013 5:56:22 PM  Gangsta Pete wrote: OUVan wrote: Just wondering but if they call a foul on that dead ball a technical why don't they call a technical when someone fouls before a ball is inbounded?  If the player inbounding the ball has possession of the ball, it is considered a live ball, even though the clock isn't running.  that was the interpretation I got. Once the ref hands the ball to the inbounder it is in play. Dead ball is after the whistle before the ball is put in play. If the ref has not handed the ball to the inbounder and kid pushes , shoves or pulls a douchey move it is a dad ball foul and results in an auto tech. For the record BO spent the day in Chicago calling the Michigan game. Would ot surprise me at all to see him and Scirotto on the Final. never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer..... The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game Back to Top Eagle66 General User Member Since: 3/13/2005 Post Count: 1,329 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/16/2013 12:40:03 AM  bornacatfan wrote: Gangsta Pete wrote: OUVan wrote: Just wondering but if they call a foul on that dead ball a technical why don't they call a technical when someone fouls before a ball is inbounded? If the player inbounding the ball has possession of the ball, it is considered a live ball, even though the clock isn't running. that was the interpretation I got. Once the ref hands the ball to the inbounder it is in play. Dead ball is after the whistle before the ball is put in play. If the ref has not handed the ball to the inbounder and kid pushes , shoves or pulls a douchey move it is a dad ball foul and results in an auto tech. For the record BO spent the day in Chicago calling the Michigan game. Would ot surprise me at all to see him and Scirotto on the Final. Up at Buffalo they grabbed Ivo to try and put him on the line before they handed ball to us to inbound. They told Buffalo the ball hadn't been put in play yet and don't call a foul. Guess that should have been a technical too. Back to Top bornacatfan General User Member Since: 8/3/2006 Post Count: 5,716 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/16/2013 9:57:06 AM  Eagle66 wrote: bornacatfan wrote: Gangsta Pete wrote: OUVan wrote: Just wondering but if they call a foul on that dead ball a technical why don't they call a technical when someone fouls before a ball is inbounded? If the player inbounding the ball has possession of the ball, it is considered a live ball, even though the clock isn't running. that was the interpretation I got. Once the ref hands the ball to the inbounder it is in play. Dead ball is after the whistle before the ball is put in play. If the ref has not handed the ball to the inbounder and kid pushes , shoves or pulls a douchey move it is a dad ball foul and results in an auto tech. For the record BO spent the day in Chicago calling the Michigan game. Would ot surprise me at all to see him and Scirotto on the Final. Up at Buffalo they grabbed Ivo to try and put him on the line before they handed ball to us to inbound. They told Buffalo the ball hadn't been put in play yet and don't call a foul. Guess that should have been a technical too. Depends on the ref. SOme guys do proactive reffing. THey talk to the kids and tell them what is going on or actually clarify rules that kids and coaches may not know the intricacies of....by rule that probably should have been a tech. Depending on maliciousness of the foul they may just say " You can't foul till we put the ball in play". If they throw him down or get really physical I guarantee it becomes a tech. Most really good refs do a LOT of proactive reffing. never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer..... The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game Back to Top Eagle66 General User Member Since: 3/13/2005 Post Count: 1,329 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/16/2013 11:12:51 AM  bornacatfan wrote: Eagle66 wrote: bornacatfan wrote: Gangsta Pete wrote: OUVan wrote: Just wondering but if they call a foul on that dead ball a technical why don't they call a technical when someone fouls before a ball is inbounded? If the player inbounding the ball has possession of the ball, it is considered a live ball, even though the clock isn't running. that was the interpretation I got. Once the ref hands the ball to the inbounder it is in play. Dead ball is after the whistle before the ball is put in play. If the ref has not handed the ball to the inbounder and kid pushes , shoves or pulls a douchey move it is a dad ball foul and results in an auto tech. For the record BO spent the day in Chicago calling the Michigan game. Would ot surprise me at all to see him and Scirotto on the Final. Up at Buffalo they grabbed Ivo to try and put him on the line before they handed ball to us to inbound. They told Buffalo the ball hadn't been put in play yet and don't call a foul. Guess that should have been a technical too. Depends on the ref. SOme guys do proactive reffing. THey talk to the kids and tell them what is going on or actually clarify rules that kids and coaches may not know the intricacies of....by rule that probably should have been a tech. Depending on maliciousness of the foul they may just say " You can't foul till we put the ball in play". If they throw him down or get really physical I guarantee it becomes a tech. Most really good refs do a LOT of proactive reffing. They basically put him in a bear hug. I don't have a problem with how they played it out, just didn't know it was a T Back to Top Monroe Slavin General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Oxnard, CA Post Count: 9,121 Status: Offline     RE: Richmond hit with 3 Ts in the last :05    Posted: 3/16/2013 4:22:31 PM  I'm not 100% familiar with it but at a quick see on replay it looked good. What borna said about good reffing--you keep the kids informed, you control the game. It's not only good reffing, it's how good businesses are run....refereeing being the business of those guys in stripes. Where's the band?! WHERE"S THE BAND?! DesignspiritUSA.com The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping! Back to Top Showing Replies:   1 - 20  of 20 Posts Jump to Page:   1 View Other 'Ohio Basketball' Topics                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               WHO'S ONLINE There are 200 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com 199 Guests 1 Registered User:   Victory There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties