Last Edited: 2/6/2013 11:45:54 PM by Brian Smith (No, not that one)
I don't see the problem.
It's better than the 18 year old kids declaring for the NBA draft, and then going undrafted. I have no problem with a kid coming to school for just 1 or 2 years. We get to watch talented players for a couple years instead of not at all. Depending on where they go, they get to improve their game and get at least some education should they choose to, AND if they decide they aren't good enough to go in the spot in the draft they want, they can come back for a second year of school.
If I were a coach, I wouldn't want to have scenarios like John Calipari does. The continuity problems are showing this year. I'd want to be sure that a couple of my recruits out of each class would have a chance to stay for three years so that you're able to bring back a few guys that played the previous year in your system.
I'm not disputing the discrimination or not. I'm simply saying I feel like there are kids who benefit from a year or two of college to get stronger, grow up a little, and improve their game that otherwise would go pro at 18. I don't have data to support it, it's just my feeling and opinion on the matter.
In another sport that I spend gross amounts of time watching - soccer - age is obviously a non-issue with 16 and 17 year olds going pro at the highest levels. So I suppose using that as an example, I can see the argument for no age limitations. Perhaps the next NBA bargaining agreement will change the situation.
Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of UsePartner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties