Last Edited: 3/26/2012 11:33:02 PM by bornacatfan
"Consider: Smart and Stevens, two midmajor coaches, turned down a $21 million job everyone now can stop referring to as great for the comforts of home. Two 35-year-old fathers passed up generational wealth and an opportunity to coach in America's best basketball conference for … stability Illinois couldn't offer?"
I wondered about this myself as it relates to compensation. If things don't work out at Illinois, in two years John could be out - either because of the team's performance, or because the new President brings in a new AD (Mike Thomas, really?) who wants to form his own basketball coaching staff. So yeah, the big $$$ might be there initially, but there are two smart coaches that have shot down this opportunity as well. Which is where I have asked, if we can get John in a long term deal that provides him long term stability and incentive laden deals that could get him up to a more elite salary level, how could we not have a more desirable situation at least in the short term of the next 2-3 years? The Illini situation is not one that a large, large number of guys have found appealing. On the other hand, his situation at Ohio is very strong from his perspective right now. He has a great returning cast for next year, and a good one for the year after that. I guess I feel like he has positioned himself to be like Brad Stevens or Mark Few in that he can stay here for a long, long time. The same stability can't be said of most "major" programs.
Now Lickliter could be a very interesting candidate. But, how do we explain the Iowa failure? He's of that age (mid 50s) where he could just stick here for a long time, no?
Last Edited: 3/28/2012 1:53:44 PM by Ohio69
Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of UsePartner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties