Last Edited: 3/4/2011 9:13:52 PM by Hooligan
this game sounded like a stinker from beginning to end so I was surpised to see how close it looked in the box score. Rebounds- 34/35 Turnovers- 10/9 pts of turnovers- 9/10 pts in paint- 28/26 both teams made 20 field goals, Ohio had two more 2s and Miami had two more 3s. Ohio took 3 more shots, all 3s. 8 of the 10 point difference came from free throws- Ohio was 22/29, Miami 30/33. In the first game both teams made the same number of 2s and same number of 3s but Miami won at the line 25/33 to Ohio's 21/26. They beat us at the foul line, twice. not worried about it though, the Cats like to play with a chip on their shoulder and now they got that back.
Last Edited: 3/5/2011 11:00:33 AM by shabamon
79--'The statistics were accurate.' Uh, less than an insight, that might be merely definitional. Now on the issue of the relevance of statistics... Yeah, my prophesy of our chances is broad. But accurate; this team could win MAC or not go very far in the tourney--would anyone contest that thought? would any reasonable observer be much surprised by either outcome? Might my disturbing analysis be, then, reasonable?
Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of UsePartner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties