Welcome Guest! Create an Account login email: password: remember me: BASKETBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting FOOTBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting MESSAGE BOARD Message Home - Ohio Basketball - Ohio Basketball Recruiting - The O Zone - Ohio Football - Ohio Football Recruiting - Ohio Volleyball - Ohio Baseball - Ohio Olympic Sports... - General OU Discussion... - Website Feedback... - Posting Policy Edit My Profile Private Messages Logout CHAT LINKS site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp Message Board BobcatAttack.com Message Board Ohio Basketball Topic:  The attack of the lower seeds Topic:  The attack of the lower seeds Author Message giacomo General User Member Since: 11/20/2007 Post Count: 2,688 Status: Offline     The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 12:12:42 PM  The lower seeds have won many more games this year than in previous years. Maybe COVID is the big equalizer, or is it something else? Last Edited: 3/21/2021 1:15:04 PM by giacomo Back to Top Pataskala General User Member Since: 7/8/2010 Location: At least six feet away from anybody else Post Count: 9,306 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 1:29:21 PM  I think covid has played a part but only by limiting the number of OOC games teams played this year. Because there are fewer games for comparing teams and conferences, some teams may have been seeded too high while others might've been seeded too low. Teams like O$U, Purdue, Georgetown and Texas seemed to have been overrated while teams like UCLA, Oregon State and even Ohio might've been underrated. We will get by. We will get by. We will get by. We will survive. Back to Top bobcatsquared General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Post Count: 5,210 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 1:45:31 PM  There are some o$u fans complaining that Oral Roberts was seeded too low and that their poor buckeyes should have had an easier first round opponent. Back to Top bornacatfan General User Member Since: 8/3/2006 Post Count: 5,711 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 1:58:13 PM  bobcatsquared wrote: There are some o$u fans complaining that Oral Roberts was seeded too low and that their poor buckeyes should have had an easier first round opponent. Illini fans are bitching about Loyola being the same thing. If you want to be the best you got to show and .....play like you are the best. Brutal. Loyola prevails with great execution and a good game plan. Moser is a good Xs Os guy. Game thread was littered with "refs", "outcoached" and "losing to a miserable MVC team". Happy to see the last post before the mods closed the game thread was "Stay classy, folks. This happens. It was a great year. We are not Ohio State fans." Last Edited: 3/21/2021 2:24:38 PM by bornacatfan never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer..... The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game Back to Top OUVan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Bethesda, MD Post Count: 5,580 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 2:47:41 PM  bornacatfan wrote: Illini fans are bitching about Loyola being the same thing. If you want to be the best you got to show and .....play like you are the best. While I agree with what you are saying, Loyola was the most underseeded team in the bracket. Back to Top bornacatfan General User Member Since: 8/3/2006 Post Count: 5,711 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 2:57:20 PM  OUVan wrote: bornacatfan wrote: Illini fans are bitching about Loyola being the same thing. If you want to be the best you got to show and .....play like you are the best. While I agree with what you are saying, Loyola was the most underseeded team in the bracket. Agree with you on that based on KenPom Do you think without the interleague play we usually have the committee just kind of got backed into a corner with that one? never argue with idiots, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. Winter comes and asks how you spent your summer..... The game loves and rewards those who love and reward the game Back to Top GraffZ06 General User Member Since: 1/5/2005 Location: Dayton, OH Post Count: 2,028 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 3:03:38 PM  bornacatfan wrote: OUVan wrote: bornacatfan wrote: Illini fans are bitching about Loyola being the same thing. If you want to be the best you got to show and .....play like you are the best. While I agree with what you are saying, Loyola was the most underseeded team in the bracket. Agree with you on that based on KenPom Do you think without the interleague play we usually have the committee just kind of got backed into a corner with that one? No the committee screwed the pooch on that one all the way around. Loyola was top 10 in both KenPom (#9) and NET (#10) and top 15 in RPI (#15). Not to mention they were ranked #17 by AP and #16 by Coaches. No excuse for them to not have been a 3 or 4 seed except "MVC = mid-major so...ehh give em an 8". They under-seeded St. Bonny (even though they lost) and VCU from A-10 by at least 2 spots as well. #MidMajorLife Back to Top JSF General User Member Since: 1/29/2005 Location: Houston, TX Post Count: 6,430 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 3:26:47 PM  Illinois got a tough draw, but you still gotta win. Few boo-hooed for Wichita when they got UK in the second round. But, yeah, I think what we're seeing this year experience and continuity returning greater value. The big schools that churn freshmen didn't have much time together, whereas mids and lower majors who have rosters of juniors and seniors were better equipped to handle it. It would not surprise me at all to have a very low-seeded Final Four this year. "Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season. My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8 Back to Top GraffZ06 General User Member Since: 1/5/2005 Location: Dayton, OH Post Count: 2,028 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 3:29:15 PM  JSF wrote: Illinois got a tough draw, but you still gotta win. Few boo-hooed for Wichita when they got UK in the second round. But, yeah, I think what we're seeing this year experience and continuity returning greater value. The big schools that churn freshmen didn't have much time together, whereas mids and lower majors who have rosters of juniors and seniors were better equipped to handle it. It would not surprise me at all to have a very low-seeded Final Four this year. Agree with all that. Back to Top OhioCatFan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Athens, OH Post Count: 14,167 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 3:53:09 PM  JSF wrote: . . .But, yeah, I think what we're seeing this year experience and continuity returning greater value. The big schools that churn freshmen didn't have much time together, whereas mids and lower majors who have rosters of juniors and seniors were better equipped to handle it. It would not surprise me at all to have a very low-seeded Final Four this year. Interesting and probative analysis. Thanks for the insight. The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA "It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right." Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org Back to Top BillyTheCat General User Member Since: 10/6/2012 Post Count: 9,808 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 4:59:38 PM  JSF wrote: Illinois got a tough draw, but you still gotta win. Few boo-hooed for Wichita when they got UK in the second round. But, yeah, I think what we're seeing this year experience and continuity returning greater value. The big schools that churn freshmen didn't have much time together, whereas mids and lower majors who have rosters of juniors and seniors were better equipped to handle it. It would not surprise me at all to have a very low-seeded Final Four this year. +2 and that will continue. Back to Top OUVan General User Member Since: 12/20/2004 Location: Bethesda, MD Post Count: 5,580 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 6:03:06 PM  JSF wrote: But, yeah, I think what we're seeing this year experience and continuity returning greater value. The big schools that churn freshmen didn't have much time together, whereas mids and lower majors who have rosters of juniors and seniors were better equipped to handle it. It would not surprise me at all to have a very low-seeded Final Four this year. I think this hits the nail on the head. All the traditional powers that scoop up the one-and-dones are having horrible years by their standards. Back to Top Maddog13 General User Member Since: 12/21/2004 Location: Albuquerque, NM Post Count: 725 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 6:28:35 PM  I am more cynical. I think the scandals involving athletic shoe companies, paid athletes, and Federal wire fraud charges have put a huge scare in some of the big programs and their staff. I agree that the pressure to recruit one and done athletes has not helped either. Likewise, the economic cost of the Pandemic on Alumni donations and gifts can't be helping either. Back to Top giacomo General User Member Since: 11/20/2007 Post Count: 2,688 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 6:53:40 PM  JSF wrote: Illinois got a tough draw, but you still gotta win. Few boo-hooed for Wichita when they got UK in the second round. But, yeah, I think what we're seeing this year experience and continuity returning greater value. The big schools that churn freshmen didn't have much time together, whereas mids and lower majors who have rosters of juniors and seniors were better equipped to handle it. It would not surprise me at all to have a very low-seeded Final Four this year. This is a very big factor. Right on target! Back to Top Pataskala General User Member Since: 7/8/2010 Location: At least six feet away from anybody else Post Count: 9,306 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 10:09:21 PM  ORU just made the Sweet 16 as a 15 seed. Are they the first 15 to make the third round since the field went to 64? We will get by. We will get by. We will get by. We will survive. Back to Top Victory General User Member Since: 3/10/2012 Post Count: 2,196 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 10:16:41 PM  Florida Gulf Coast made it as a 15 about 7 years ago. Back to Top OrlandoCat General User Member Since: 3/15/2005 Location: United States Post Count: 355 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 10:26:13 PM  OUVan wrote: JSF wrote: But, yeah, I think what we're seeing this year experience and continuity returning greater value. The big schools that churn freshmen didn't have much time together, whereas mids and lower majors who have rosters of juniors and seniors were better equipped to handle it. It would not surprise me at all to have a very low-seeded Final Four this year. I think this hits the nail on the head. All the traditional powers that scoop up the one-and-dones are having horrible years by their standards. Just to prove this point even further....this is the first NCAA tournament ever that won't have Kentucky, Duke, or UNC in the sweet 16. Back to Top JSF General User Member Since: 1/29/2005 Location: Houston, TX Post Count: 6,430 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/21/2021 11:20:19 PM  Only three what most would consider traditional powers left: Kansas, Villanova, and Syracuse. "Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season. My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8 Back to Top GraffZ06 General User Member Since: 1/5/2005 Location: Dayton, OH Post Count: 2,028 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/22/2021 12:27:14 AM  OrlandoCat wrote: Just to prove this point even further....this is the first NCAA tournament ever that won't have Kentucky, Duke, or UNC in the sweet 16. That's actually not true. There have been a handful of years that none of UNC, Duke or UK made the Sweet 16 - 1953 1954 1965 1974 1976 1979 That being said it's the first time since the tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985. 40 teams qualified for the tournament the last time it happened, back in 1979. Back to Top JSF General User Member Since: 1/29/2005 Location: Houston, TX Post Count: 6,430 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/22/2021 12:45:59 AM  None of them made it to the second round either. "Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season. My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8 Back to Top 100%Cat General User Member Since: 1/17/2013 Post Count: 2,535 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/22/2021 8:16:35 AM  GraffZ06 wrote: bornacatfan wrote: OUVan wrote: bornacatfan wrote: Illini fans are bitching about Loyola being the same thing. If you want to be the best you got to show and .....play like you are the best. While I agree with what you are saying, Loyola was the most underseeded team in the bracket. Agree with you on that based on KenPom Do you think without the interleague play we usually have the committee just kind of got backed into a corner with that one? No the committee screwed the pooch on that one all the way around. Loyola was top 10 in both KenPom (#9) and NET (#10) and top 15 in RPI (#15). Not to mention they were ranked #17 by AP and #16 by Coaches. No excuse for them to not have been a 3 or 4 seed except "MVC = mid-major so...ehh give em an 8". They under-seeded St. Bonny (even though they lost) and VCU from A-10 by at least 2 spots as well. #MidMajorLife On ESPN Radio yesterday, I heard a guy say the top 8 in NET rankings were all 1-2 seeds. Loyola was #10...and got an 8 seed. Back to Top Recovering Journalist General User Member Since: 8/17/2010 Location: Cleveland, OH Post Count: 1,839 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/22/2021 8:55:55 AM  100%Cat wrote: GraffZ06 wrote: bornacatfan wrote: OUVan wrote: bornacatfan wrote: Illini fans are bitching about Loyola being the same thing. If you want to be the best you got to show and .....play like you are the best. While I agree with what you are saying, Loyola was the most underseeded team in the bracket. Agree with you on that based on KenPom Do you think without the interleague play we usually have the committee just kind of got backed into a corner with that one? No the committee screwed the pooch on that one all the way around. Loyola was top 10 in both KenPom (#9) and NET (#10) and top 15 in RPI (#15). Not to mention they were ranked #17 by AP and #16 by Coaches. No excuse for them to not have been a 3 or 4 seed except "MVC = mid-major so...ehh give em an 8". They under-seeded St. Bonny (even though they lost) and VCU from A-10 by at least 2 spots as well. #MidMajorLife On ESPN Radio yesterday, I heard a guy say the top 8 in NET rankings were all 1-2 seeds. Loyola was #10...and got an 8 seed. The underseeding of quality mid-majors has been happening for decades. Back in the 90s when the MAC was regularly churning out NBA players and teams like Ball State, EMU and Fiami made runs, the MAC was always the same crappy 12+ seed no matter what any other ranking system said it should be. The moneyed conferences control the committee and the moneyed conferences want all the high seeds. The funny part is when that avarice bites them in the ass like it did to Illinois this year... and they complain about the rigged system that they rigged themselves. Hoist by their own petard. Back to Top OUcats82 General User Member Since: 1/9/2005 Location: Cincinnati, OH Post Count: 1,853 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/22/2021 9:08:48 AM  What I find really frustrating is your conference affiliation and related rankings will always seem to restrict how far you can ascend if you are not in a high-major conference. Loyola is not too far removed from a Final Four run but that may as well be ancient history as I don't think it gave them any benefit this year while other schools have lived off of pedigree and past success for years. While I give them all of the credit in the world for stepping up and knocking off their #1 seed, I fear that will only give the committee ammo to say "see, they were able to succeed regardless of seeding-isn't March Madness great?!" At least in basketball worthy schools are given the opportunity to be at the table with a chance to compete. Ohio-The State University Back to Top Recovering Journalist General User Member Since: 8/17/2010 Location: Cleveland, OH Post Count: 1,839 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/22/2021 9:19:05 AM  OUcats82 wrote: What I find really frustrating is your conference affiliation and related rankings will always seem to restrict how far you can ascend if you are not in a high-major conference. Loyola is not too far removed from a Final Four run but that may as well be ancient history as I don't think it gave them any benefit this year while other schools have lived off of pedigree and past success for years. While I give them all of the credit in the world for stepping up and knocking off their #1 seed, I fear that will only give the committee ammo to say "see, they were able to succeed regardless of seeding-isn't March Madness great?!" At least in basketball worthy schools are given the opportunity to be at the table with a chance to compete. Getting a seat at the table where the major conferences are gorging themselves is nearly impossible. Gonzaga's trip to top seeding is almost two decades long. They didn't even make the tournament until 1995, but they've been in every one since 1999, and they had to overcome bad seeding for many of those earlier trips. Gonzaga became Gonzaga through 20 years of excellence. That's nearly impossible for any mid-major and it's even harder for public school from a conference that's also fielding D1 football teams. Back to Top giacomo General User Member Since: 11/20/2007 Post Count: 2,688 Status: Offline     RE: The attack of the lower seeds    Posted: 3/22/2021 10:56:40 AM  It’s true that the P5 get the benefit of the doubt on seeding every year. How can a mid major improve their standing? It’s almost impossible, as the scheduling is not fair. Play P5 games on the road, if you can get them. This is what should happen if the NCAA is serious about fairness: have a mid and P5 do a two year round robin home and away. The MAC and Big Ten. We play at OSU this year and Purdue comes to the Convo next year, something like that. Back to Top Showing Replies:   1 - 25  of 27 Posts Jump to Page:   1 | 2    Next > View Other 'Ohio Basketball' Topics                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               WHO'S ONLINE There are 281 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com 279 Guests 2 Registered Users:   Shawn Sellers, El Gato Roberto There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2024 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties