Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  Army QB UTM 60+ TD

Topic:  Army QB UTM 60+ TD
Author
Message
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/27/2016 2:24:19 PM 
So there was an inventive play. Hope Albin was watching.


"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,196

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/27/2016 2:26:03 PM 
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.
Back to Top
  
BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,059

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/27/2016 8:15:05 PM 
GoCats105 wrote:
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.


Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.
Back to Top
  
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/27/2016 8:33:28 PM 
BillyTheCat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.


Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.


Basically the option version of the Ohio QB draw UTM. Ohio already has it. Guess I was too subtle with a suggestion for more UTM. Should have added a :).


"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,059

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/27/2016 9:01:38 PM 
Bcat2 wrote:
BillyTheCat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.


Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.


Basically the option version of the Ohio QB draw UTM. Ohio already has it. Guess I was too subtle with a suggestion for more UTM. Should have added a :).



Again, you have no clue
Back to Top
  
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/27/2016 9:12:36 PM 
BillyTheCat wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
BillyTheCat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.


Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.


Basically the option version of the Ohio QB draw UTM. Ohio already has it. Guess I was too subtle with a suggestion for more UTM. Should have added a :).



Again, you have no clue


You are too kind.


"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
allen
General User

Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,635

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/28/2016 1:49:40 AM 
Bcat2 wrote:
BillyTheCat wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
BillyTheCat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.


Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.


Basically the option version of the Ohio QB draw UTM. Ohio already has it. Guess I was too subtle with a suggestion for more UTM. Should have added a :).



Again, you have no clue


You are too kind.


The defenses we play are too good for the triple option and we will never get a top notch qb running that offense. We can run some variations of it with an athletic QB, to keep a defense guessing and confuse their defensive line. the only way to win as a non power 5 is too run the spread, no FBS defense can cover 4 good wide receivers. That is why teams like bugs use to thrash us.


Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach. Woody Hayes

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/28/2016 2:44:03 AM 
Please do not feed the Bcat2. It's best when he or she is ignored.

Give him or her time to absorb that we lost 3 of our last 4 this year, with the only win being a fine 9-3 performance over a terrific Akron squad.


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,196

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/28/2016 7:16:07 AM 
allen wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
BillyTheCat wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
BillyTheCat wrote:
GoCats105 wrote:
Except Army's offense, and other triple option offenses around the country, are designed for that.


Yeah, bcat has no clue on the basic differences, from line schemes to formations.


Basically the option version of the Ohio QB draw UTM. Ohio already has it. Guess I was too subtle with a suggestion for more UTM. Should have added a :).



Again, you have no clue


You are too kind.


The defenses we play are too good for the triple option and we will never get a top notch qb running that offense. We can run some variations of it with an athletic QB, to keep a defense guessing and confuse their defensive line. the only way to win as a non power 5 is too run the spread, no FBS defense can cover 4 good wide receivers. That is why teams like bugs use to thrash us.


I'm gonna disagree with you on the defenses being too good. Navy has proven year after year you can consistently win with the triple option. Georgia Southern has their own version of it. Air Force is good. Georgia Tech won an Orange Bowl using it.

Would I like to see the triple option return to Athens? No. But it can work, in theory, on a consistent basis.

Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,385

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/28/2016 11:37:20 AM 
Monroe Slavin wrote:
Please do not feed the Bcat2. It's best when he or she is ignored.

Give him or her time to absorb that we lost 3 of our last 4 this year, with the only win being a fine 9-3 performance over a terrific Akron squad.

Me thought you were always fact-based in your analysis. You've been informed by never wrong WikiBAleaks that bcat2 is a male; yet you continue to indicate his gender is unknown. So much for fact-based rhetoric. Little journalistic errors of this sort put into question your otherwise sterling reputation as our certified pigskin analyst.


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/28/2016 7:09:54 PM 
I'll believe it when the Bcat2 himself or herself shows some grace and steps up and acknowledges.


Isn't it about time for the 2017 season prediction thread?



Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
bshot44
General User



Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: Army QB UTM 60+ TD
   Posted: 12/28/2016 10:06:03 PM 
Monroe Slavin wrote:
I'll believe it when the Bcat2 himself or herself shows some grace and steps up and acknowledges.


Isn't it about time for the 2017 season prediction thread?




Allow me

Hampton W
Purdue L
Kansas W
UMass W
Kent W
Akron W
BG L
Miami L
UB W
MAC West W
MAC West L
MAC West L
Boring Bowl L

7-6 (4-4)
Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 12  of 12 Posts
Jump to Page:  1
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties