Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board
BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature

Topic:  Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
Author
Message
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/18/2016 8:27:17 AM 
Again I am here with a request for a premium (yes I am willing to pay to limit who I interact with) blocking feature. Twitter offers it for free. Not sure why this board compels me to sort through piles of negative in order to find the news and information I need to follow the team.

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/18/2016 9:39:47 AM 
Ryan did the development on this forum, and did a great job. Unfortunately he doesn't have the time to spend to continue developing it to add significant new features, so we need to accept that it is what it is, and be thankful it is here at all. A couple years ago he had to disable the code that allowed you to post graphics and such, because he didn't have the time to update it to work with google chrome. It was a loss, but the forum still do serve their core function.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
bshot44
General User



Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/18/2016 1:07:50 PM 
Bcat2 wrote:
Again I am here with a request for a premium (yes I am willing to pay to limit who I interact with) blocking feature. Twitter offers it for free. Not sure why this board compels me to sort through piles of negative in order to find the news and information I need to follow the team.


Talk about a new level of absurdity! C'mon....it's a message board. People are going to have differing opinions. Some super negative...some overly positive. If all you want is all-positive all the time...start your own board. Until then, let the chronic complainers complain and let the Suzy Sunshines glow......

We're all here because we are Ohio Bobcat fans. We don't have to be robots and have all the same thoughts on here. If you don't like the negativity, just ignore it and move on. No one is forcing you to interact with people that have a different view than yours.
Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,158

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/18/2016 1:36:04 PM 
Bcat2 wrote:
Again I am here with a request for a premium (yes I am willing to pay to limit who I interact with) blocking feature. Twitter offers it for free. Not sure why this board compels me to sort through piles of negative in order to find the news and information I need to follow the team.


Really? You sound just like the guys who only watch fox or msnbc. Open your eyes to the reality of the world - there are differences of opinion.
Back to Top
  
Recovering Journalist
General User

Member Since: 8/17/2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Post Count: 1,852

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/18/2016 1:50:50 PM 
Bcat2 wrote:
Again I am here with a request for a premium (yes I am willing to pay to limit who I interact with) blocking feature. Twitter offers it for free. Not sure why this board compels me to sort through piles of negative in order to find the news and information I need to follow the team.


Is scrolling that taxing on your index finger?
Back to Top
  
OU_Country
General User



Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,353

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/18/2016 2:03:43 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
Again I am here with a request for a premium (yes I am willing to pay to limit who I interact with) blocking feature. Twitter offers it for free. Not sure why this board compels me to sort through piles of negative in order to find the news and information I need to follow the team.


Really? You sound just like the guys who only watch fox or msnbc. Open your eyes to the reality of the world - there are differences of opinion.




I guess there's a desire for fair and balanced in this forum too.
Back to Top
  
BuddyLee
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 671

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/18/2016 7:45:08 PM 
Shouldn't this thread be in the website feedback forum?
Back to Top
  
allen
General User

Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,635

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 12:21:17 AM 
When I was younger I used to get angry when people disagreed with me. Post 21, I realized that people will disagree and even though they may disagree, it is not always personal. It's a part of growing up, you have to learn how to agree to disagree. None of us are God, we cannot and should not try to impose our will on anyone.

Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach. Woody Hayes
Back to Top
  
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 8:58:40 AM 
allen wrote:
When I was younger I used to get angry when people disagreed with me. Post 21, I realized that people will disagree and even though they may disagree, it is not always personal. It's a part of growing up, you have to learn how to agree to disagree. None of us are God, we cannot and should not try to impose our will on anyone.


Everyone. has allen just implied that I am "angry," that I need "growing up," that I think I am "God?" Did he just imply that in wishing to screen whose posts I read I am imposing my will on others? A little help here, please.

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
The Situation
General User



Member Since: 7/12/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 9:15:18 AM 
Bcat2 wrote:
allen wrote:
When I was younger I used to get angry when people disagreed with me. Post 21, I realized that people will disagree and even though they may disagree, it is not always personal. It's a part of growing up, you have to learn how to agree to disagree. None of us are God, we cannot and should not try to impose our will on anyone.


Everyone. has allen just implied that I am "angry," that I need "growing up," that I think I am "God?" Did he just imply that in wishing to screen whose posts I read I am imposing my will on others? A little help here, please.


I'm sure allen's heart is in the right place. But it came off to me as well that he was trivializing your request.

For the reasons L.C. referenced I don't think we can realistically expect an ignore feature.

But I can relate Bcat, scrolling past comments from the same person every single time does not effectively replace an ignore feature. And when people suggest the scroll as the solution I also find it patronizing.

There's a reason the phrase out of sight out of mind exists.
Back to Top
  
bobcatsquared
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,338

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 9:33:45 AM 
Maybe Bcat2 is on to something. However, I'm not sure which is worse. Having to read the negative posts Bcat2 wants to ignore? Or reading all of Bcat2's posts about how everything having to do with Solich and Bobcat football has been, is, and always will be perfect?

Last Edited: 2/19/2016 9:34:13 AM by bobcatsquared
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 9:50:53 AM 
bobcatsquared wrote:
Maybe Bcat2 is on to something. However, I'm not sure which is worse. Having to read the negative posts Bcat2 wants to ignore? Or reading all of Bcat2's posts about how everything having to do with Solich and Bobcat football has been, is, and always will be perfect?

I'm sure some would ignore one group, some the other, and others still both. That's how it is supposed to work.

I note that, on other issues, Alan supports things that might lead to more responsible posting. A point that I think he misses is that the presence of an ignore feature also serves this purpose. Since people know that if they push too far, they will get ignored, and then have no one listening to them anymore, people tend to behave somewhat more responsibly when an ignore feature is present. It's not a panacea, of course, but nothing is. The implied threat that if a person goes too far, too often, they may lose their audience is the primary benefit, however, not the savings in scrolling.

Realistically, however, the only way this will happen is if the day comes when BA scraps the existing software, and purchases "forum software" that already includes this feature.

Last Edited: 2/19/2016 9:51:55 AM by L.C.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 10:09:53 AM 
L.C. wrote:
bobcatsquared wrote:
Maybe Bcat2 is on to something. However, I'm not sure which is worse. Having to read the negative posts Bcat2 wants to ignore? Or reading all of Bcat2's posts about how everything having to do with Solich and Bobcat football has been, is, and always will be perfect?

I'm sure some would ignore one group, some the other, and others still both. That's how it is supposed to work.

I note that, on other issues, Alan supports things that might lead to more responsible posting. A point that I think he misses is that the presence of an ignore feature also serves this purpose. Since people know that if they push too far, they will get ignored, and then have no one listening to them anymore, people tend to behave somewhat more responsibly when an ignore feature is present. It's not a panacea, of course, but nothing is. The implied threat that if a person goes too far, too often, they may lose their audience is the primary benefit, however, not the savings in scrolling.

Realistically, however, the only way this will happen is if the day comes when BA scraps the existing software, and purchases "forum software" that already includes this feature.


You don't know how much it would be worth to me to have the BA information without certain opinion. How much might it cost? Some act as if this is uncommon. Twitter anyone. Or is it a matter of the post count/views generated by constant bickering?

Last Edited: 2/19/2016 10:11:59 AM by Bcat2

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,158

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 10:13:04 AM 
Bcat2 wrote:
allen wrote:
When I was younger I used to get angry when people disagreed with me. Post 21, I realized that people will disagree and even though they may disagree, it is not always personal. It's a part of growing up, you have to learn how to agree to disagree. None of us are God, we cannot and should not try to impose our will on anyone.


Everyone. has allen just implied that I am "angry," that I need "growing up," that I think I am "God?" Did he just imply that in wishing to screen whose posts I read I am imposing my will on others? A little help here, please.


Sounds like it to me. Maybe he's on to something.
Back to Top
  
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 10:41:05 AM 
Alan Swank wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
allen wrote:
When I was younger I used to get angry when people disagreed with me. Post 21, I realized that people will disagree and even though they may disagree, it is not always personal. It's a part of growing up, you have to learn how to agree to disagree. None of us are God, we cannot and should not try to impose our will on anyone.


Everyone. has allen just implied that I am "angry," that I need "growing up," that I think I am "God?" Did he just imply that in wishing to screen whose posts I read I am imposing my will on others? A little help here, please.


Sounds like it to me. Maybe he's on to something.



There has got to be some place else for Bobcat information.

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
Robert Fox
General User

Member Since: 11/16/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 11:24:33 AM 
If personal attacks are off limits on BA.com, then this thread is too much. The shots at Bcat2 are puzzling to me. He supports the team. So what? That's not so offensive, is it? To me, he is not the polar opposite of Monroe, because Bcat2 is not campaigning for anything, at least nothing obvious to me. He just sees the bright side. For whatever reason, that really grates some of you.

Now I see LC's point about the advantage of an ignore feature, and it's an interesting angle. The crap that some folks sling around here would likely be more controlled if people posted under real names. Since that ain't happening, it would be nice to have some other way of tempering bad behavior. Would an ignore feature help to do that? I have my doubts, but maybe.

But, Monroe posts under his real name, so that's not an issue. His only issue is beating-a-dead-horse-endlessly-and-forever. Is that a pain in the arse? Absolutely. Is it worth Ryan spending time and money fixing? Probably not.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 12:03:26 PM 
Robert Fox wrote:
...
Now I see LC's point about the advantage of an ignore feature, and it's an interesting angle. The crap that some folks sling around here would likely be more controlled if people posted under real names. Since that ain't happening, it would be nice to have some other way of tempering bad behavior. Would an ignore feature help to do that? I have my doubts, but maybe.
...

The reason why many sites have an ignore feature is that they have no particular downside, other than the expense to develop them, and they do have some benefits. My observation at other sites is that "griefers" (people who post primarily for the purpose of annoying others) become more well behaved, bullying decreases significantly, and people who beat a dead horse tend to beat it less often.

All this is irrelevant because BA has no development budget. If Ryan were going to do development work again, I'd rather he put the effort into getting the site capable of posting pictures, gifs, different fonts, etc, again.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
bshot44
General User



Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 12:39:57 PM 
Bcat2 wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
allen wrote:
When I was younger I used to get angry when people disagreed with me. Post 21, I realized that people will disagree and even though they may disagree, it is not always personal. It's a part of growing up, you have to learn how to agree to disagree. None of us are God, we cannot and should not try to impose our will on anyone.


Everyone. has allen just implied that I am "angry," that I need "growing up," that I think I am "God?" Did he just imply that in wishing to screen whose posts I read I am imposing my will on others? A little help here, please.


Sounds like it to me. Maybe he's on to something.



There has got to be some place else for Bobcat information.



Sadly, there's not. Other than Jason Arkley and some hit-and-miss BobcatTV stuff online, you're out of luck.

But if you want to take you ball and go home....no one is stopping you.

I find this entire thread laughable.

It's. A. Message. Board.

What do you think goes on in these things? People disagree...people argue...people are stupid...people are smart.

If you can't handle sifting thru all that for your valuable information....then don't come around.
Back to Top
  
allen
General User

Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,635

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 12:56:31 PM 
Bcat2 wrote:
allen wrote:
When I was younger I used to get angry when people disagreed with me. Post 21, I realized that people will disagree and even though they may disagree, it is not always personal. It's a part of growing up, you have to learn how to agree to disagree. None of us are God, we cannot and should not try to impose our will on anyone.


Everyone. has allen just implied that I am "angry," that I need "growing up," that I think I am "God?" Did he just imply that in wishing to screen whose posts I read I am imposing my will on others? A little help here, please.


I like all of you guys and I respect you, you love the same thing that I love and that is Ohio, we may disagree, but I love this site. You guys make the site the site. We have had our tiffs, but no there are no hard feelings here.

Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach. Woody Hayes
Back to Top
  
GoCats105
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,275

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 12:58:09 PM 
bshot44 wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
allen wrote:
When I was younger I used to get angry when people disagreed with me. Post 21, I realized that people will disagree and even though they may disagree, it is not always personal. It's a part of growing up, you have to learn how to agree to disagree. None of us are God, we cannot and should not try to impose our will on anyone.


Everyone. has allen just implied that I am "angry," that I need "growing up," that I think I am "God?" Did he just imply that in wishing to screen whose posts I read I am imposing my will on others? A little help here, please.


Sounds like it to me. Maybe he's on to something.



There has got to be some place else for Bobcat information.




I find this entire thread laughable.

It's. A. Message. Board.




Today's thread on BobcatAttack brought to you by the wonderful people at whogivesasheet.com.
Back to Top
  
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 1:03:52 PM 
allen wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
allen wrote:
When I was younger I used to get angry when people disagreed with me. Post 21, I realized that people will disagree and even though they may disagree, it is not always personal. It's a part of growing up, you have to learn how to agree to disagree. None of us are God, we cannot and should not try to impose our will on anyone.


Everyone. has allen just implied that I am "angry," that I need "growing up," that I think I am "God?" Did he just imply that in wishing to screen whose posts I read I am imposing my will on others? A little help here, please.


I like all of you guys and I respect you, you love the same thing that I love and that is Ohio, we may disagree, but I love this site. You guys make the site the site. We have had our tiffs, but no there are no hard feelings here.


What?

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
Casper71
General User

Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,062

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 3:48:47 PM 
Said it before and will say it again...who in their right mind takes anything said on a blog like this as the gospel or personal? The diversity is what makes it interesting. If we all said the same thing it would be boring. Nobody saying anyone has to read or post anything on here. So, if you don't like it go to some other board for fun. Time to get over it and grow up...
Back to Top
  
bshot44
General User



Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 4:32:55 PM 
Casper71 wrote:
Said it before and will say it again...who in their right mind takes anything said on a blog like this as the gospel or personal? The diversity is what makes it interesting. If we all said the same thing it would be boring. Nobody saying anyone has to read or post anything on here. So, if you don't like it go to some other board for fun. Time to get over it and grow up...


+99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

Last Edited: 2/19/2016 4:33:38 PM by bshot44
Back to Top
  
The Situation
General User



Member Since: 7/12/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 957

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 5:11:48 PM 
Casper71 wrote:
Said it before and will say it again...who in their right mind takes anything said on a blog like this as the gospel or personal?


yeah bcat don't take anything a person says to you on here personally. After all they're just a person communicating to you, another person...

Oh wait. In that case you would be in your right mind to take it personally.
Back to Top
  
Monroe Slavin
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Again Requesting a Premium Twitter Style Blocking Feature
   Posted: 2/19/2016 7:11:10 PM 
Robert Fox wrote:
If personal attacks are off limits on BA.com, then this thread is too much. The shots at Bcat2 are puzzling to me. He supports the team. So what? That's not so offensive, is it? To me, he is not the polar opposite of Monroe, because Bcat2 is not campaigning for anything, at least nothing obvious to me. He just sees the bright side. For whatever reason, that really grates some of you.

Now I see LC's point about the advantage of an ignore feature, and it's an interesting angle. The crap that some folks sling around here would likely be more controlled if people posted under real names. Since that ain't happening, it would be nice to have some other way of tempering bad behavior. Would an ignore feature help to do that? I have my doubts, but maybe.

But, Monroe posts under his real name, so that's not an issue. His only issue is beating-a-dead-horse-endlessly-and-forever. Is that a pain in the arse? Absolutely. Is it worth Ryan spending time and money fixing? Probably not.



He supports the team may be the biggest understatement ever. There's reasonable discourse, then there's allegiance that is over the edge.


Where's the band?!
WHERE"S THE BAND?!


DesignspiritUSA.com
The Pets On The Go Collection of pet gear travel bags
The Holiday Tote Bigg Bagg Collection--over-sized, reversible, extra pockets; now love carrying packages as much as you love shopping!

Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 25  of 26 Posts
Jump to Page:  1 | 2    Next >
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             



WHO'S ONLINE
There are 384 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com
382 Guests
2 Registered Users:
 M.D.W.S.T, OUbobcat9092
There are no other users looking at this page.




Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties