BobcatAttack.com - For Fans of Ohio University Sports

Welcome Guest!
Create an Account

advertise with us

BobcatAttack.com Message Board

Topic: Laseak suspended for 1st half vs. Akron

Topic: Laseak suspended for 1st half vs. Akron

Author

Message

Brufus
General User

Member Since: 12/13/2011
Location: Wherever Miami and Michigan suck
Post Count: 416

Status: Offline

Laseak suspended for 1st half vs. Akron

Posted: 10/13/2014 7:59:42 PM

Per an Arkley tweet; I had a feeling it was gonna be either a half or the whole game

Deciduous Forest Cat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Ohio
Post Count: 4,466

Status: Offline

RE: Laseak suspended for 1st half vs. Akron

Posted: 10/13/2014 8:24:12 PM

By the NCAA, the MAC or by Solich?

Pataskala
General User

Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,363

Status: Offline

RE: Laseak suspended for 1st half vs. Akron

Posted: 10/13/2014 8:47:06 PM

NCAA rules. If the punch had occurred in the first half, he would be eligible for all of the Akron game. But a second half ejection means the player sits the first half of the next game.

We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.

bobcat695
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Post Count: 1,345

Status: Offline

RE: Laseak suspended for 1st half vs. Akron

Posted: 10/13/2014 9:02:22 PM

I just watched the replay of that part of the game. As ridiculous as it sounds, I think he was just trying to punch the ball. There is no camera angle to verify or deny that, but it didn't look like he was throwing haymakers at someone. I don't have a problem with the call, but watching the replay doesn't make me think he was blatantly malicious.

"You can't un-fist a fist pump." - Saul Phillips 1/24/15

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,492

Status: Offline

RE: Laseak suspended for 1st half vs. Akron

Posted: 10/13/2014 9:14:05 PM

bobcat695 wrote:

I just watched the replay of that part of the game. As ridiculous as it sounds, I think he was just trying to punch the ball. There is no camera angle to verify or deny that, but it didn't look like he was throwing haymakers at someone. I don't have a problem with the call, but watching the replay doesn't make me think he was blatantly malicious.

I agree, but the stupid thing about the play was that, even if he had knocked the ball loose, the player was already on the ground, and there is no way it could have been ruled a fumble.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline

RE: Laseak suspended for 1st half vs. Akron

Posted: 10/14/2014 6:50:18 AM

L.C. wrote:

bobcat695 wrote:

I just watched the replay of that part of the game. As ridiculous as it sounds, I think he was just trying to punch the ball. There is no camera angle to verify or deny that, but it didn't look like he was throwing haymakers at someone. I don't have a problem with the call, but watching the replay doesn't make me think he was blatantly malicious.

I agree, but the stupid thing about the play was that, even if he had knocked the ball loose, the player was already on the ground, and there is no way it could have been ruled a fumble.

DE is a position from which you would not want to miss time. There are some young studs who are just hoping for their turn.

Last Edited: 10/14/2014 6:51:40 AM by Bcat2

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Showing Replies:	1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Jump to Page:	1

View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics

There are 208 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com

207 Guests
1 Registered User:
	71 BOBCAT

There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties