Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  A few brief game observations

Topic:  A few brief game observations
Author
Message
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,743

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  A few brief game observations
   Posted: 9/7/2014 9:54:30 AM 
The tone of the game was set by the officials in the first quarter.

First, there was the touchdown that wasn't, which occurred right in front of me. I had a much better view of that play than the official who could not see the plane of the end zone from his position. I could. While the receiver's foot was in the end zone the ball never crossed the plane. The replay, which they showed on the screen at the stadium clearly showed that, but the replay officials apparently had their SEC glasses on and only saw what they wanted to see. While not as bad as the four-yard safety this was pretty outrageous.

Second, there was the fumble that wasn't. While I did not have as good a view of this one, it was a strange overturn of a call on the field. They did play the replay on the big screen once, and it really seemed there was not enough evidence to overturn. It certainly looked like the ball was coming out before it hit the ground, and certainly not enough evidence to say it didn't. Again, I suspect if this had been an Ohio fumble under identical circumstances the replay results might have been different.

If these two calls had gone the other way, the whole tone of the first quarter would have been different, and Ohio would have gained some early confidence that I think would have made for a tighter game. I know others disagree, but I've always felt that these psychological factors can play a huge role in games of this type. I didn't really see our offense as being that much outmatched by UK's defense, but that the offense was too tentative and was less "well oiled." That is, I don't think the various parts of the offense have worked together long enough to have really jelled. The dropped passes was but one indication of that. In only one case did I think the drop pass was directly due to an intimidation by the UK defense. I think that will come as the season progresses. If I was NIU I'd be worried about a certain date in Athens in November.

Overall, I thought OHIO played tough and disciplined football. Though Vick, I think, is more athletic and quicker than Sprague, the team chemistry seemed better with Sprague at the helm. I expect him to start against Marshall, with Vick still getting a lot of playing time. The D looked very good and actually seemed to get stronger late in the game, probably after they lost the SEC jitters. You can tell that the defense is still getting used to the more aggressive scheme that is being used this year, and it looked to me that occasionally assignments were getting blown. On the way back to our hotel from the stadium, about a mile and half walk, a nice UK fan start a conversation with me and the first thing he said was a shout out to our defense. He said, "that's a very good defense you have. I was very impressed." Says it all in my mind.

Kentucky looked to me overall as a much better team than the one I saw last year that lost its opener to WKU. I was particularly impressed with Towles. He is a big, mobile QB who is a threat to run and does well seeing open receivers. My impression was that his receiving corps was less talented than he. I suspect UK may make it up to the middle of the pack in the SEC this year rather than the usual fighting it out for last place with Vanderbilt.

Last Edited: 9/7/2014 10:14:03 AM by OhioCatFan


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
colobobcat66
General User

Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,546

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: A few brief game observations
   Posted: 9/7/2014 10:09:48 AM 
OhioCatFan wrote:
The tone of the game was set by the officials in the first quarter.

First, there was the touchdown that wasn't, which occurred right in front of me. I had a much better view of that play than the official who could not see the plane of the end zone from his position. I could. While the receiver's foot was in the end zone the ball never crossed the plane. The replay, which they showed on the screen at the stadium clearly showed that, but the replay officials apparently had their SEC glasses on and only saw what they wanted to see. While not as bad as the four-yard safety this was pretty outrageous.

Second, there was the fumble that wasn't. While I did not have as good a view of this one, it was a strange overturn of a call on the field. They did play the replay on the big screen once, and it really seemed there was not enough evidence to overturn. It certainly looked like the ball was coming out before it hit the ground, and certainly not enough evidence to say it didn't. Again, I suspect if this had been an Ohio fumble under identical circumstances the replay results might have been different.

If these two calls had gone the other way, the whole tone of the first quarter would have been different, and Ohio would have gained some early confidence that I think would have made for a tighter game. I know others disagree, but I've always felt that these psychological factors can play a huge role in games of this type. I didn't really see our offense as being that much outmatched by UK, but that the offense was too tentative and was less "well oiled." That is, I don't think the various parts of the offense have worked together long enough to have really jelled. I think that will come as the season progresses. If I was NIU I'd be worried about a certain date in Athens in November.

Overall, I thought OHIO played tough and disciplined football. Though Vick, I think, is more athletic and quicker than Sprague, the team chemistry seemed better with Sprague at the helm. I expect him to start against Marshall, with Vick still getting a lot of playing time. The D looked very good and actually seemed to get stronger late in the game, probably after they lost the SEC jitters. You can tell that the defense is still getting used to the more aggressive scheme that is being used this year, and it looked to me that occasionally assignments were getting blown. On the way back to our hotel from the stadium, about a mile and half walk, a nice UK fan start a conversation with me and the first thing he said was a shout out to our defense. He said, "that's a very good defense you have. I was very impressed. Says it all in my mind."

Kentucky looked to me overall as a much better team than the one I saw last year that lost its opener to WKU. I was particularly impressed with Towles. He is a big, mobile QB who is a threat to run and does well seeing open receivers. My impression was that his receiving corps was less talented than he. I suspect UK may make it up to the middle of the pack in the SEC this year rather than the usual fighting it out for last place with Vanderbilt.



I agree with you on about everything you said. Reading the local paper though you have to remember that they had 3 of their top 4 pass receivers from last year out for this game and were playing a walkon guard I believe at guard because of an injury this week. When they get Heard back they will be better as well. I see them winning maybe 3 games in the SEC, but other than Vandy, I'm not sure who it will be.
We played about as well as we could under the circumstances, we just need some experience on the offensive side.

Last Edited: 9/7/2014 10:10:38 AM by colobobcat66

Back to Top
  
BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,391

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: A few brief game observations
   Posted: 9/7/2014 10:36:21 AM 
OhioCatFan wrote:
The tone of the game was set by the officials in the first quarter.

First, there was the touchdown that wasn't, which occurred right in front of me. I had a much better view of that play than the official who could not see the plane of the end zone from his position. I could. While the receiver's foot was in the end zone the ball never crossed the plane. The replay, which they showed on the screen at the stadium clearly showed that, but the replay officials apparently had their SEC glasses on and only saw what they wanted to see. While not as bad as the four-yard safety this was pretty outrageous.

Second, there was the fumble that wasn't. While I did not have as good a view of this one, it was a strange overturn of a call on the field. They did play the replay on the big screen once, and it really seemed there was not enough evidence to overturn. It certainly looked like the ball was coming out before it hit the ground, and certainly not enough evidence to say it didn't. Again, I suspect if this had been an Ohio fumble under identical circumstances the replay results might have been different.

If these two calls had gone the other way, the whole tone of the first quarter would have been different, and Ohio would have gained some early confidence that I think would have made for a tighter game. I know others disagree, but I've always felt that these psychological factors can play a huge role in games of this type. I didn't really see our offense as being that much outmatched by UK's defense, but that the offense was too tentative and was less "well oiled." That is, I don't think the various parts of the offense have worked together long enough to have really jelled. The dropped passes was but one indication of that. In only one case did I think the drop pass was directly due to an intimidation by the UK defense. I think that will come as the season progresses. If I was NIU I'd be worried about a certain date in Athens in November.

Overall, I thought OHIO played tough and disciplined football. Though Vick, I think, is more athletic and quicker than Sprague, the team chemistry seemed better with Sprague at the helm. I expect him to start against Marshall, with Vick still getting a lot of playing time. The D looked very good and actually seemed to get stronger late in the game, probably after they lost the SEC jitters. You can tell that the defense is still getting used to the more aggressive scheme that is being used this year, and it looked to me that occasionally assignments were getting blown. On the way back to our hotel from the stadium, about a mile and half walk, a nice UK fan start a conversation with me and the first thing he said was a shout out to our defense. He said, "that's a very good defense you have. I was very impressed." Says it all in my mind.

Kentucky looked to me overall as a much better team than the one I saw last year that lost its opener to WKU. I was particularly impressed with Towles. He is a big, mobile QB who is a threat to run and does well seeing open receivers. My impression was that his receiving corps was less talented than he. I suspect UK may make it up to the middle of the pack in the SEC this year rather than the usual fighting it out for last place with Vanderbilt.



Seriously? You start the entire thread out by laying "the tone" on the officials? Wow! We were overmatched, simple! We battled, the defense dug in and played well. The Offense was what many on here thought it would be early on. But to start out "throwing" officials under the bus. That's non-sense.
Back to Top
  
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Ohio
Post Count: 4,466

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: A few brief game observations
   Posted: 9/7/2014 10:39:11 AM 
I agree there was no way the ball crossed the plane on that first touchdown, but they clearly did not have a goal line cam to overturn for that one.

The fumble call was correct. The player landed on his back then the ball popped out. it did appear at one time like the ball was coming out, but he had clearly regained control until he hit the ground

Last Edited: 9/7/2014 10:39:46 AM by Deciduous Forest Cat

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,494

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: A few brief game observations
   Posted: 9/7/2014 11:45:28 AM 
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:
I agree there was no way the ball crossed the plane on that first touchdown, but they clearly did not have a goal line cam to overturn for that one.

The fumble call was correct. The player landed on his back then the ball popped out. it did appear at one time like the ball was coming out, but he had clearly regained control until he hit the ground

I agree with DCF, here, not OCF. I also agree with Billy that the officiating had no effect whatsoever on the "tone" of the game. After the initial drive, the defense really only had one one bad play, the long TD run, where they just got caught out of position. Other than that, any gains by Kentucky were due to good things done by Kentucky, and not to bad things done by Ohio.

Even if the one TD had been called down at the 1 foot line, I think Kentucky probably would have scored anyway, so that call, right or wrong, had no impact on the game.  As for whether it affected the "tone" of the game, I would say, definitely, no. This team has too much unity and focus to be affected that way. Last year's team did get affected by things like phantom safeties, but I don't expect to see that this year, at all, ever. If they do get a truly terrible call this year, I'd expect them to just come back out playing harder.

Last Edited: 9/7/2014 12:12:14 PM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Hawaiian Bobcat
General User

Member Since: 1/31/2005
Location: Wailuku, HI
Post Count: 334

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: A few brief game observations
   Posted: 9/7/2014 3:01:28 PM 
I am not a fan of thinking the officials set the tone. I think the two early dropped passes especially the second drop. Early successful big plays can give a young offense confidence and keep the defense rested.
Back to Top
  
TheBobcatBandit
General User



Member Since: 8/25/2013
Post Count: 618

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: A few brief game observations
   Posted: 9/7/2014 3:25:14 PM 
What killed us early was not stopping UK on 3rd and long. Both of their scoring drives they had had big 3rd and long conversions. On the first drive they may have had 2
Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,743

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: A few brief game observations
   Posted: 9/7/2014 4:32:26 PM 
L.C. wrote:
. . . Even if the one TD had been called down at the 1 foot line, I think Kentucky probably would have scored anyway, so that call, right or wrong, had no impact on the game. . . . 


Yes, but that likely would have been an FG and not a TD.   It would have been fourth and goal at the one foot line, and I suspect that UK would have gone for an FG.  If they hadn't there's no guarantee they would have made the TD, as Ohio did have some good defensive stands in that game inside the 20.  An FG giving up 3 points is a lot different from giving up 7 in the early going and does set a "tone" that sometimes can be hard to overcome.  I know that some folks don't believe in this type of gestalt analysis of games, but I truly believe that often psychological factors like holding a team to a FG rather than a TD on its first possession can make a real difference in momentum (which I know some of this board say doesn't exist) and can make a difference in the final outcome. 

I do agree with what some others have posted that the unacceptable number of dropped passes also took some of the wind out of our sails.  Channeling my old student chucky babe on that one! 

Speaking of Chuck, I hope that he finds things truly unacceptable again next weekend! 



The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 8  of 8 Posts
Jump to Page:  1
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties