Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board

BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  According to Nate Silver. . .

Topic:  According to Nate Silver. . .
Author
Message
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User

Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,078

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 5:45:08 PM 

there are exactly 8 D-1 college football teams in the country with a smaller following of fans than OU. And five of them are in our conference.  After reading this article, it doesn't make one feel hopeful about OU and the rest of the MAC as realignment begins. 

http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/19/the-geography-of-college-football-fans-and-realignment-chaos/

Back to Top
  
Jeff McKinney
Moderator

Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,155

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 6:09:30 PM 
Very interesting article.  When time allows, I'd like to read it more closely with an eye to whether the data methods are sound.

This answers the question of why the MAC, including Ohio, isn't involved in the realignment situation. 

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,497

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 6:29:04 PM 
Very interesting article that explains a lot. I found it interesting that, in view of the frequent contrasting done here between the schedules of Toledo and Ohio, and the supposed impact of such scheduling on the fan base, that there was virtually no difference when it comes to fan support. This is especially surprising because one school is in a significantly larger city.

Another comment I would make is that they are tracking a shifting market. Schools are constantly trying to increase their fan base, with various levels of success. If it is true that winning is a key element in building fan support, Ohio many be able to increase their fan base somewhat this year.

Finally I would point out that 100,000 fans is but a tiny portion of the Ohio alumni base. Ohio may be able to increase fan interest two places. The first is among the region, getting support from local in SE Ohio and WV. They may also be able to build fan support among the alums. Just because the Ohio fan base is only 100,000 today doesn't mean it can't be quite a big higher a decade from now. I'm guessing that if a similar study was done 5 years ago, Ohio's fan base would have been smaller than it is today. I'm also guessing that hypothetically, if Ohio were to move to a BCS conference, their alumni base would take them more seriously, and more would support the program. To that extent it is sort of a chicken and egg situation.

I think Ohio is taking the correct approach. Win game. Promote locally, and promote to alums.  It takes awhile, though.

Last Edited: 9/19/2011 6:33:01 PM by L.C.


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
JSF
General User



Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,554

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 6:29:47 PM 
Silver is reliable.


"Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season.

My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8

Back to Top
  
mf279801
General User

Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,472

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 8:38:18 PM 
120 - 109 (our position) = 11. There are 11 schools with smaller followings than us, according to this data. That being said, I spy 2 methodological shortcuts that make me question our number of fans (though since they would affect most schools equally, it might not alter our relative rank)

First, I consider myself a pretty serious college football fan (I don't want to disclose how much time a day I devote to the subject) but I had never heard of common census sports map project until thisafternoon, reading this article. For such an online survey to have never passed my attention (and to only garner 30,000 responses after "several years") tells me that it was fairly obscure and implies that some groups of fans knew about it while the majority of other fans did not.

The second, and much more glaring, short-cut/error: it relies on google search queries/media market to determine who is/isn't a college football fan!** I don't know about other people on this board, but I don't know that i've ever googled "college football". I guess that means i'm not a college football fan, nevermind how i've spent my last 3 saturdays (and 3 thursday nights, and parts of 1 sunday and 1 monday, and the time I've spent writing this). It seems like new comers or non-serious fans might google "college football", but those of us in the know would go to espn, scouts.com, rivals, presnapread, collegefootballtalk, everydayshouldbesaturday, etc.

In all, I don't know how much weight to give this article, other than to assume that an editor at the NY Times asked nate to do a piece on conference realignment and nate wanted to try out a new database of google search results by media market. 


**This isn't to imply that I know of a more feasible measure of college football fandom readily divisible by area.
Back to Top
  
mf279801
General User

Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,472

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 8:58:25 PM 
As an aside, I find it pretty funny that, according to the commoncensus map, Temple has no fans (certainly no concentration in the Phillie area) and Miami (OH)'s fans appear to be concentrated in downstate New York, just north of NYC.
Back to Top
  
perimeterpost
General User



Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 9:07:20 PM 
Silver should stick to politics. We're supposed to believe Akron has 3x the number of fans as Central Michigan? or that Buffalo has twice as many fans as Toledo? Or that Troy has 4x the number of fans as OHIO? Troy has 7K students averages around 18K in attendance and is in a town of around 18K. No way. 

c'mon, this is all a bunch of new aged hooey.

Last Edited: 9/19/2011 9:08:26 PM by perimeterpost


MY STATE. MY TEAM.

Back to Top
  
Voice of Reason
General User



Member Since: 7/28/2010
Post Count: 249

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 9:08:12 PM 
Where is Dick Vedder when we need him?
Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,762

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 9:20:54 PM 
Voice of Reason wrote:
Where is Dick Vedder when we need him?


Thanks for stealing my line.


The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
JSF
General User



Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,554

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 10:46:52 PM 
perimeterpost wrote:
Silver should stick to politics.


He started in sports, you know.


"Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season.

My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8

Back to Top
  
Mike Coleman
Administrator



Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Near the Pristine Sandy Shores of Lake Erie, OH
Post Count: 1,643

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 11:30:08 PM 
JSF wrote:
perimeterpost wrote:
Silver should stick to politics.


He started in sports, you know.


+1 for Dragon. You can shoot the messenger  if you want, but college sports powers-that-be are using stats like this over common sense when it comes to the realignment fervor. I will say, however, that in a Gold Rush most are likely to make big mistakes looking for Fools Gold.
Back to Top
  
mf279801
General User

Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,472

Status: Offline

  Message Not Read  RE: According to Nate Silver. . .
   Posted: 9/19/2011 11:57:27 PM 
JSF wrote:
perimeterpost wrote:
Silver should stick to politics.


He started in sports, you know.


Baseball, no? If you want meaningful commentary on college football, don't look to the NY Times, nor to a New Yorker (SUNY Buffalo* is the state's flagship school for God's sake). I have experienced few things more frustrating than trying to discuss college football with New Yorkers (the state, not the city)**. The great majority of the people I discuss college football with here are either explants from proper states (those that put at least as much emphasis on saturdays as sundays) or went to college there.

*Where I am currently a grad student
** Its been one of those days, forgive me some bashing of NY based on sterotypes, with appologies to BuffaloCatFan.
Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 12  of 12 Posts
Jump to Page:  1
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties