Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board
BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  Bowl ratings

Topic:  Bowl ratings
Author
Message
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,103

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/4/2020 3:37:16 PM 
https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/college-football-tv-ratings /

Looks like Eastern was the big winner from the MAC.

Last Edited: 1/4/2020 3:39:06 PM by Alan Swank
Back to Top
  
OUbobcat9092
General User

Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Post Count: 1,156

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/4/2020 5:20:46 PM 
That list doesn't include 3 of the MAC games.

WMU - not updated yet
Ohio - game not listed at all?
Miami - game not listed at all?

Bring Back Men's Track & Field

Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,103

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/4/2020 7:56:47 PM 
The percentage decline in 11 of the 12 "bottom" bowls has to be a concern for someone. Was it the time, the day, the match up or something else that led to a drop off as much as 51%?
Back to Top
  
Long Train Runnin'
General User

Member Since: 12/25/2004
Location: Cambridge, OH
Post Count: 118

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/5/2020 3:52:35 AM 
I was only able to watch the first quarter of the Potato Bowl, due to having a high school basketball game that evening. But I watched the midnight replay on ESPNU in its entirety.
Back to Top
  
Pataskala
General User

Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,336

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/5/2020 3:46:41 PM 
OUbobcat9092 wrote:
That list doesn't include 3 of the MAC games.

WMU - not updated yet
Ohio - game not listed at all?
Miami - game not listed at all?


They haven't yet listed any games after January 1. Must've taken a long weekend.

We will get by.
We will get by.
We will get by.
We will survive.
Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,103

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/5/2020 9:38:15 PM 
Click on some of those regular season games. Our game with Miami on November 7, 2018, had 213K viewers.
Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,354

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 12:33:21 AM 
Alan Swank wrote:
Click on some of those regular season games. Our game with Miami on November 7, 2018, had 213K viewers.


Well the game on Nov 6th 2019 had 359K viewers and was the most watched college football game that night! ;-)

The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
rpbobcat
General User

Member Since: 4/28/2006
Location: Rochelle Park, NJ
Post Count: 3,570

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 6:29:35 AM 
One thing ratings don't take into account is how many "third party" people
watch part or all of the game.

Went out to an early dinner Friday at a local restaurant.
Every T.V. had our game on.

I had to go to a 6:30 Council Meeting.
(N.J. requires every local government to hold a Reorganization Meeting
by 1/07.Friday nights are popular, so they can go out after.)

Anyway,I go the meeting.

Several guys came over to me and said something to the effect "How come you're here now.Should have waited to your bowl was over."
Some,at least out here,people were watching.
Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,103

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 9:21:27 AM 
OhioCatFan wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
Click on some of those regular season games. Our game with Miami on November 7, 2018, had 213K viewers.


Well the game on Nov 6th 2019 had 359K viewers and was the most watched college football game that night! ;-)


That's funny OCF considering it was the ONLY game on that night. As in-stadium attendance continues to decrease, I'm just wondering if it's really worth it to 1) have all of these crazy day of the week games and 2) what emperical evidence is there that with 38 bowl games with 76 teams, that going to a bowl game year after year and year is really worth it.
Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,354

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 9:48:59 AM 
Alan Swank wrote:
OhioCatFan wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
Click on some of those regular season games. Our game with Miami on November 7, 2018, had 213K viewers.


Well the game on Nov 6th 2019 had 359K viewers and was the most watched college football game that night! ;-)


That's funny OCF considering it was the ONLY game on that night. As in-stadium attendance continues to decrease, I'm just wondering if it's really worth it to 1) have all of these crazy day of the week games and 2) what emperical evidence is there that with 38 bowl games with 76 teams, that going to a bowl game year after year and year is really worth it.


Glad you got my joke, Alan. I’m actually with you on decreasing the number of weekday night games in freezing weather.

The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 10:29:18 AM 
Alan Swank wrote:
https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/college-football-tv-ratings /

Looks like Eastern was the big winner from the MAC.

MAC Bowls
Bahamas Bowl (Buffalo) -2% Rating, -12% viewers, -101,000 viewers
First Responder Bowl (WMU) -11% viewers, -203,000 viewers
Frisco Bowl (Kent) -11% Rating, -14% viewers, -159,000 viewers
New Mexico Bowl (CMU) -26% Rating, -17% viewers, -164,000 viewers
Quick Lane Bowl (EMU) +13% Rating, +13% viewers, +351,000 viewers

Total for the first five bowls with MAC teams: -277,000 viewers, -3.7%

With plenty of bowls at -25% to -50%, the MAC didn't have any disasters (yet), and overall they did far better than the average bowl games. I think that the Potato Bowl had a good time slot, and most likely had pretty good viewership, too. Who will want to watch the LendingTree Bowl, though?


“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Robert Fox
General User

Member Since: 11/16/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 10:45:37 AM 
Curious why you say the Potato was a good time slot. For me, it was not (3:30 on a Friday when I was at work). Not sure why they didn't start it a bit later so the east coasters could be home from work, etc.
Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,103

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 11:02:01 AM 
Robert Fox wrote:
Curious why you say the Potato was a good time slot. For me, it was not (3:30 on a Friday when I was at work). Not sure why they didn't start it a bit later so the east coasters could be home from work, etc.


Agreed. Other than being the only game on, most people were back at work on Friday as opposed to Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday.

Was it Pitt as the attraction, the bowl name or the time slot that let to the increased number of viewers for that bowl?
Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,103

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 11:07:56 AM 
And this sums it up in rather concrete terms.

https://brobible.com/sports/article/famous-idaho-potato-b... /

Now the question is does the average viewer than make a conscious decision to buy an Idaho potato when they are standing in the Kroger produce section?

By the way the aveage person eats 124 pounds of potatoes a year.

Last Edited: 1/6/2020 11:09:25 AM by Alan Swank
Back to Top
  
Tymaster
General User

Member Since: 3/24/2017
Location: Chillicothe, OH
Post Count: 255

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 12:46:46 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
Robert Fox wrote:
Curious why you say the Potato was a good time slot. For me, it was not (3:30 on a Friday when I was at work). Not sure why they didn't start it a bit later so the east coasters could be home from work, etc.


Agreed. Other than being the only game on, most people were back at work on Friday as opposed to Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday.

Was it Pitt as the attraction, the bowl name or the time slot that let to the increased number of viewers for that bowl?


Agreement with NBA. Neither party wants to be relegated to ESPN2. The solution? Move time slots.
Back to Top
  
Mark Lembright '85
General User

Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 1:45:11 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
Robert Fox wrote:
Curious why you say the Potato was a good time slot. For me, it was not (3:30 on a Friday when I was at work). Not sure why they didn't start it a bit later so the east coasters could be home from work, etc.


Agreed. Other than being the only game on, most people were back at work on Friday as opposed to Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday.



A lot of people were still off that Friday, myself included, so it was a good time for me. :) Seriously though, there were still a good number of people off that day, and probably even more that didn't quite work the whole day that day anyway.

Let's face it, with 39 bowl games, it's very difficult to get a primetime slot, especially considering the NFL play-offs were also starting with the NFL occupying a Saturday and a Sunday to themselves.

Last Edited: 1/6/2020 1:45:27 PM by Mark Lembright '85
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/6/2020 1:58:34 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
Robert Fox wrote:
Curious why you say the Potato was a good time slot. For me, it was not (3:30 on a Friday when I was at work). Not sure why they didn't start it a bit later so the east coasters could be home from work, etc.


Agreed. Other than being the only game on, most people were back at work on Friday as opposed to Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday.

Was it Pitt as the attraction, the bowl name or the time slot that let to the increased number of viewers for that bowl?


I guess my schedule was different. I worked Tuesday and Thursday, but was off early on Friday. I watched the first half at the gym, and many others were watching it as well. I watched the second half at a sports bar, which was very full, and it was getting plenty of attention there as well.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/8/2020 12:01:45 PM 
Numbers have been posted for the Spud Bowl, and they were pretty solid, with the rating unchanged, and viewers barely off, down 1%. In fact, the Potato Bowel was the best performance of the bottom ten bowls, and among the bottom 15, only the mouth of the mouse bowl was up.

MAC Bowls
Bahamas Bowl (Buffalo) -2% Rating, -12% viewers, -101,000 viewers
First Responder Bowl (WMU) n/c rating, -11% viewers, -203,000 viewers
Frisco Bowl (Kent) -11% Rating, -14% viewers, -159,000 viewers
New Mexico Bowl (CMU) -26% Rating, -17% viewers, -164,000 viewers
Quick Lane Bowl (EMU) +13% Rating, +13% viewers, +351,000 viewers
Famous Idaho Potato Bowl (Ohio) n/c rating, -1% viewers, -14,000 viewers
Total for the first six bowls with MAC teams: -291,000 viewers, -3.3%

There haven't been any total disasters for the MAC, pending results from the LendingTree Bowl. As it stands, the Potato Bowl was the second most watched MAC bowl, edging out WMU, but far behind the Quick Lane Bowl.

Last Edited: 1/8/2020 12:07:12 PM by L.C.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,103

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/8/2020 1:16:19 PM 
L.C. wrote:
Numbers have been posted for the Spud Bowl, and they were pretty solid, with the rating unchanged, and viewers barely off, down 1%. In fact, the Potato Bowel was the best performance of the bottom ten bowls, and among the bottom 15, only the mouth of the mouse bowl was up.

MAC Bowls
Bahamas Bowl (Buffalo) -2% Rating, -12% viewers, -101,000 viewers
First Responder Bowl (WMU) n/c rating, -11% viewers, -203,000 viewers
Frisco Bowl (Kent) -11% Rating, -14% viewers, -159,000 viewers
New Mexico Bowl (CMU) -26% Rating, -17% viewers, -164,000 viewers
Quick Lane Bowl (EMU) +13% Rating, +13% viewers, +351,000 viewers
Famous Idaho Potato Bowl (Ohio) n/c rating, -1% viewers, -14,000 viewers
Total for the first six bowls with MAC teams: -291,000 viewers, -3.3%

There haven't been any total disasters for the MAC, pending results from the LendingTree Bowl. As it stands, the Potato Bowl was the second most watched MAC bowl, edging out WMU, but far behind the Quick Lane Bowl.


So what do you mean by "total disaster?'

I looks like we'll finish third in the MAC in bowl viewers.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/8/2020 1:27:35 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
So what do you mean by "total disaster?'

I looks like we'll finish third in the MAC in bowl viewers.

I would consider any bowl that lost over 20% of it's viewers to have had a total disaster. There were a dozen of them:
1. San Francisco Bowl -51%
2. Orange Bowl -48%
3. Birmingham Bowl -40%
4. Cotton Bowl -34%
5. Gasparilla Bowl -34%
6. Armed Forces Bowl -33%
7. New Orleans Bowl -30%
8. Camellia Bowl -30%
9. Sugar Bowl -23%
10. Celebration Bowl -23%
11. Military Bowl -22%
12. Las Vegas Bowl -21%

Bowls that used to be huge, but which weren't a part of the playoffs (Orange-Sugar-Cotton) are hit hard.

Ratings aren't in for the LendingTree Bowl yet.

Last Edited: 1/8/2020 1:31:08 PM by L.C.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,103

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/8/2020 1:47:24 PM 
L.C. wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
So what do you mean by "total disaster?'

I looks like we'll finish third in the MAC in bowl viewers.

I would consider any bowl that lost over 20% of it's viewers to have had a total disaster. There were a dozen of them:
1. San Francisco Bowl -51%
2. Orange Bowl -48%
3. Birmingham Bowl -40%
4. Cotton Bowl -34%
5. Gasparilla Bowl -34%
6. Armed Forces Bowl -33%
7. New Orleans Bowl -30%
8. Camellia Bowl -30%
9. Sugar Bowl -23%
10. Celebration Bowl -23%
11. Military Bowl -22%
12. Las Vegas Bowl -21%

Bowls that used to be huge, but which weren't a part of the playoffs (Orange-Sugar-Cotton) are hit hard.

Ratings aren't in for the LendingTree Bowl yet.


I guess it depends on how you define disaster. There are 330 million people in America. Less than .4% of them watched the bowl. Is that a disaster? Again, it depends on how you spell disaster. Because the teams change from year to year as do dates and times, it's not a same store to store comparison so it's tough to put much value on the the numbers.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/8/2020 3:02:13 PM 
Alan Swank wrote:
I guess it depends on how you define disaster. There are 330 million people in America. Less than .4% of them watched the bowl. Is that a disaster? Again, it depends on how you spell disaster. Because the teams change from year to year as do dates and times, it's not a same store to store comparison so it's tough to put much value on the the numbers.

No one expects the Potato Bowl to draw the same as a matchup between Clemson and OSU. To me it's a disaster when a bowl doesn't meet expectations, and they have to issue refunds to advertisers for failing to deliver the viewers they promised. I think that the Potato Bowl delivered the viewers that were promised. Some of the MAC bowls were 10-17% short, but none were like, say, the Gasparilla Bowl, Camellia Bowl, or New Orleans Bowls, which all featured Sunbelt/CUSA teams, and which were all down >30%.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Alan Swank
General User

Member Since: 12/11/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,103

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/8/2020 10:10:18 PM 
L.C. wrote:
Alan Swank wrote:
I guess it depends on how you define disaster. There are 330 million people in America. Less than .4% of them watched the bowl. Is that a disaster? Again, it depends on how you spell disaster. Because the teams change from year to year as do dates and times, it's not a same store to store comparison so it's tough to put much value on the the numbers.

No one expects the Potato Bowl to draw the same as a matchup between Clemson and OSU. To me it's a disaster when a bowl doesn't meet expectations, and they have to issue refunds to advertisers for failing to deliver the viewers they promised. I think that the Potato Bowl delivered the viewers that were promised. Some of the MAC bowls were 10-17% short, but none were like, say, the Gasparilla Bowl, Camellia Bowl, or New Orleans Bowls, which all featured Sunbelt/CUSA teams, and which were all down >30%.


And where have you seen where bowls had to deliver refunds?
Back to Top
  
Jeff McKinney
Moderator

Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,123

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/8/2020 11:59:13 PM 
The entire bowl system is a house of cards IMO. Just a matter of time until it collapses in some form.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: Bowl ratings
   Posted: 1/9/2020 12:24:39 AM 
Alan Swank wrote:
And where have you seen where bowls had to deliver refunds?

This article is about Pro Football, but the same thing no doubt applies to bowls:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-nfl-viewership...
chicago tribune wrote:
...When TV networks sell commercials, they guarantee advertisers a certain number of viewers. If they don't fulfill their promise, they must offer free commercial time elsewhere to make up for it, potentially missing out on revenue from selling those ad spots instead.
...

So, "refund" was probably a poor word choice, since they don't actually give the cash back. Instead they give additional advertising so that the advertiser gets the exposure he was promised. In real life, that's about the same thing. If ESPN is giving away free ads that they could have sold, it's costing them real money.

Even at the local level, if a media company fails to deliver the market they promised, it is typical to "comp" the advertiser. Media companies are not looking for a one-time sale to an advertiser; they want happy advertisers who continue to buy, so they treat them fairly, and that means comping them when necessary.

Last Edited: 1/9/2020 12:30:40 AM by L.C.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 25  of 29 Posts
Jump to Page:  1 | 2    Next >
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             



WHO'S ONLINE
There are 174 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com
173 Guests
1 Registered User:
 shabamon
There are no other users looking at this page.




Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties