Welcome Guest!
Create an Account
login email:
password:
site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp
Message Board
BobcatAttack.com Message Board
Ohio Football
Topic:  QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018

Topic:  QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
Author
Message
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 9/24/2018 5:54:19 PM 
http://www.espn.com/ncf/qbr/_/group/15

Buffalo - Jackson 88.3
Toledo - Guadagni 83.3
EMU - Glass 78.1
Ohio - Rourke 66.9
Ball St - Neal 65.5
WMU - Wassink 61.8
EMU - Wiegers 58.3
[Ohio - Maxwell 56.8]
Kent - Barret 54.2
BG - Doege 44.1
Akron - Nelson 43.6
Miami - Ragland 42.3
NIU - Childers 28.3
CMU - Poljan 21.9

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
BillyTheCat
General User

Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,014

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 9/24/2018 11:45:04 PM 
L.C. wrote:
http://www.espn.com/ncf/qbr/_/group/15

Buffalo - Jackson 88.3
Toledo - Guadagni 83.3
EMU - Glass 78.1
Ohio - Rourke 66.9
Ball St - Neal 65.5
WMU - Wassink 61.8
EMU - Wiegers 58.3
[Ohio - Maxwell 56.8]
Kent - Barret 54.2
BG - Doege 44.1
Akron - Nelson 43.6
Miami - Ragland 42.3
NIU - Childers 28.3
CMU - Poljan 21.9


Speaks volumes to how poor the MAC is. A conference who at one time had 4 QB’s in the League is reduced to this.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 9/25/2018 4:16:10 AM 
Jackson is #6 in the country in 2018, and 20th best single season all-time, since the QBR rating was originated.

All time best MAC QB seasons, since 2004:
http://www.espn.com/ncf/qbr/_/type/alltime-season/group/15

1. Jackson, Buffalo, 2018 88.3
2. Guadagni, Toledo, 2018 83.3
3. Terrell, WMU, 2016 81.9
4. Harnish, NIU, 2010 78.7
5. Glass, EMU, 2018 78.1
6. Woodside, Toledo 2016 77.9
7. Johnson, BG 2015 77.4
8. Jacobs, BG 2004 74.4

Ohio's best is Rourke in 2017, at #12, with a rating of 73.5. Vick in 2014 came in at #42 in the MAC, all time, with 61.5, and Tettleton in 2011 is #44 at 60.5.

It's interesting how these ratings seem to be rising, 3 of the top 5 all time this year. The same is true on a nationwide basis, with 3 of the top 5 all time ratings being from this year (Tagovialoa Alabama 97.8, Murray Oklahoma 95.6, Haskins OSU 93.7). The highest all-time complete seasons, by the way, are from Russell Wilson in 2011 at 94.1, Andrew Luck in 2010 at 93.8, and Baker Mayfield in 2017 at 91.8.

Last Edited: 9/25/2018 4:16:51 AM by L.C.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
UpSan Bobcat
General User



Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,800

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 9/25/2018 10:49:00 AM 
Of note, these ratings are adjusted based on opponents played.
Back to Top
  
UpSan Bobcat
General User



Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,800

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/3/2018 11:36:31 AM 
L.C. wrote:
http://www.espn.com/ncf/qbr/_/group/15

Buffalo - Jackson 88.3
Toledo - Guadagni 83.3
EMU - Glass 78.1
Ohio - Rourke 66.9
Ball St - Neal 65.5
WMU - Wassink 61.8
EMU - Wiegers 58.3
[Ohio - Maxwell 56.8]
Kent - Barret 54.2
BG - Doege 44.1
Akron - Nelson 43.6
Miami - Ragland 42.3
NIU - Childers 28.3
CMU - Poljan 21.9


With his huge game against UMass, Rourke's adjusted rating (taking into account opponents played) is 75.0, ranking him 23rd in the country. His raw rating of 79.8 ranks him 21st. Wassink actually passed Rourke but Glass no longer qualifies to be rated. Really highly rated QB play from the MAC's top five, Guadagni, Jackson, Wassink, Rourke and Neal (41st). Poor play from the rest.

RK PLAYER RAW QBR TOTAL QBR
1 Mitchell Guadagni, TOL 83.6 84.4
2 Tyree Jackson, BUFF 86.3 83.6
3 Jon Wassink, WMU 81.2 79.0
4 Nathan Rourke, OHIO 79.8 75.0
5 Riley Neal, BALL 65.5 67.7
6 Woody Barrett, KENT 57.1 54.3
7 Gus Ragland, M-OH 52.7 49.9
8 Kato Nelson, AKRON 42.9 44.8
9 Jarret Doege, BGSU 54.9 44.4
10 Tyler Wiegers, EMU1 42.5 43.3
11 Tommy Lazzaro, CMU 42.3 42.5
12 Marcus Childers, NIU 24.6 30.0
13 Tony Poljan, CMU 19.3 23.5
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/3/2018 12:58:06 PM 
L.C. wrote:
Jackson is #6 in the country in 2018, and 20th best single season all-time, since the QBR rating was originated.

All time best MAC QB seasons, since 2004:
http://www.espn.com/ncf/qbr/_/type/alltime-season/group/15

1. Jackson, Buffalo, 2018 88.3
2. Guadagni, Toledo, 2018 83.3
3. Terrell, WMU, 2016 81.9
4. Harnish, NIU, 2010 78.7
5. Glass, EMU, 2018 78.1
6. Woodside, Toledo 2016 77.9
7. Johnson, BG 2015 77.4
8. Jacobs, BG 2004 74.4

Ohio's best is Rourke in 2017, at #12, with a rating of 73.5. Vick in 2014 came in at #42 in the MAC, all time, with 61.5, and Tettleton in 2011 is #44 at 60.5.

It's interesting how these ratings seem to be rising, 3 of the top 5 all time this year. The same is true on a nationwide basis, with 3 of the top 5 all time ratings being from this year (Tagovialoa Alabama 97.8, Murray Oklahoma 95.6, Haskins OSU 93.7). The highest all-time complete seasons, by the way, are from Russell Wilson in 2011 at 94.1, Andrew Luck in 2010 at 93.8, and Baker Mayfield in 2017 at 91.8.

Guadagni, and Jackson remain #1 and #2 all time in the MAC (since these ratings originated about 2004). Wassink is #4, and Rourke is #8 all time in the MAC. It will be interesting to see if these ratings rise or fall as the year progresses.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
OhioStunter
General User



Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/3/2018 1:09:31 PM 
BillyTheCat wrote:
L.C. wrote:
http://www.espn.com/ncf/qbr/_/group/15

Buffalo - Jackson 88.3
Toledo - Guadagni 83.3
EMU - Glass 78.1
Ohio - Rourke 66.9
Ball St - Neal 65.5
WMU - Wassink 61.8
EMU - Wiegers 58.3
[Ohio - Maxwell 56.8]
Kent - Barret 54.2
BG - Doege 44.1
Akron - Nelson 43.6
Miami - Ragland 42.3
NIU - Childers 28.3
CMU - Poljan 21.9


Speaks volumes to how poor the MAC is. A conference who at one time had 4 QB’s in the League is reduced to this.


I'm not sure the sample to date is an ideal indicator of overall performance. These are mostly based on non-conf games, which are against either really higher tier or really lower tier foes. So the data may be skewed.
Back to Top
  
L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,470

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/7/2018 2:24:06 PM 
UpSan Bobcat wrote:
...
RK PLAYER RAW QBR TOTAL QBR
1 Mitchell Guadagni, TOL 83.6 84.4
2 Tyree Jackson, BUFF 86.3 83.6
3 Jon Wassink, WMU 81.2 79.0
4 Nathan Rourke, OHIO 79.8 75.0
5 Riley Neal, BALL 65.5 67.7
6 Woody Barrett, KENT 57.1 54.3
7 Gus Ragland, M-OH 52.7 49.9
8 Kato Nelson, AKRON 42.9 44.8
9 Jarret Doege, BGSU 54.9 44.4
10 Tyler Wiegers, EMU1 42.5 43.3
11 Tommy Lazzaro, CMU 42.3 42.5
12 Marcus Childers, NIU 24.6 30.0
13 Tony Poljan, CMU 19.3 23.5


RK PLAYER RAW QBR TOTAL QBR
1 Mitchell Guadagni, TOL 83.6 85.4 (+1)
2 Tyree Jackson, BUFF 82.8 80.4 (-3)
3 Nathan Rourke, OHIO 78.5 76.6 (+2)
4 Jon Wassink, WMU 79.5 76.6 (-2)
5 Mike Glass, EMU 74.3 72.9
6 Riley Neal, BALL 61.8 64.7 (-3)
7 Gus Ragland, M-OH 56.9 56.6 (+7)
8 Woody Barrett, KENT 58.4 51.6 (-3)
9 Jarret Doege, BGSU 55.0 43.3 (-1)
10 Tyler Wiegers, EMU1 39.5 40.3 (-3)
11 Kato Nelson, AKRON 40.2 38.5 (-6)
12 Tommy Lazzaro, CMU 39.6 36.4 (-6)
13 Marcus Childers, NIU 26.0 30.9 (+1)

The more I look at QBR as a rating method, the more confused I get. For example, consider that Barrett, against Ohio, had a raw rating of 64.2, but an adjusted rating of only 38.6. I know Ohio's pass defense is not good, but that's a pretty large adjustment.

Or, compare the week's performances of Ragland and Rourke.
Rourke 18-20-1 284 yards and a TD, and had 15 carries for 49 yards and a TD.
Ragland was 24-33-1 214 yards and a TD, and had 6 carries for 22 yards, no TD.

When you look at the older rating, pass efficiency there is a huge difference in the ratings:
Rourke 215.8
Ragland 131.1

Looking at QBR the ratings are:
Rouke 74.0 raw, 73.8 adjusted
Ragland 74.4 raw, 77.6 adjusted

Last Edited: 10/7/2018 2:49:37 PM by L.C.

“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.” ― Epictetus

Back to Top
  
UpSan Bobcat
General User



Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,800

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/7/2018 5:43:35 PM 
Rourke also lost a fumble and his team scored 27 points whereas Ragland's team scored 41. That probably accounts for a big part of it.
Back to Top
  
UpSan Bobcat
General User



Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,800

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/22/2018 12:16:57 PM 
Nathan Rourke is now by far the top rated QB in the MAC in QBR at 82.4, more than 7 points better than Toledo's Mitchell Gaudagni. Rourke ranks fifth in the nation overall, and this is adjusted for quality of opponent. He's just behind Fresno State's McMaryion (fourth) and Ohio State's Dwayne Haskins (third). Rourke's QBR for the Bowling Green game was 98.5 (99.5 before being adjusted for playing against BG).
Back to Top
  
bshot44
General User



Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/22/2018 12:27:55 PM 
Most useless stat going ... QBR. It's garbage.

http://footballscoop.com/news/mike-leach-makes-case-usele... /
Back to Top
  
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/22/2018 4:04:33 PM 
Getting like baseball. Stats for everything. Stats adjusted for level of competition, under pressure or not. Stats will be loved by those who agree with their indications, will be panned by those who do not. Really this reminds me there are things outside to better fill my time.

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
UpSan Bobcat
General User



Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,800

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/22/2018 5:32:19 PM 
There's no perfect stat. That would be impossible. But I don't know of any quarterback stat that takes into account more things. And I'm sure anyone would agree that Rourke has been great. I was legitimately concerned about his passing accuracy after the first game but he's proven that it was just a fluky bad game.
Back to Top
  
Kevin Finnegan
General User

Member Since: 2/4/2005
Location: Rockton, IL
Post Count: 1,146

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/22/2018 5:54:04 PM 
bshot44 wrote:
Most useless stat going ... QBR. It's garbage.

http://footballscoop.com/news/mike-leach-makes-case-usele... /



The article and your mention are arguing two separate things. Leach is arguing that the QER is the most useless stat, that's the one that can go through the roof. For example, Rourke had a QER (QB Efficiency Rating) of 311.8.

As for QBR, I believe that is out of 100. It's something more understandable than QER. It takes rushing, opponent, passing, everything into account. I think it's a bit more reliable than QER. That being said, I don't know the weight that coaches put on it.

Back to Top
  
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/22/2018 6:10:39 PM 
finnOhio wrote:
bshot44 wrote:
Most useless stat going ... QBR. It's garbage.

http://footballscoop.com/news/mike-leach-makes-case-usele... /



The article and your mention are arguing two separate things. Leach is arguing that the QER is the most useless stat, that's the one that can go through the roof. For example, Rourke had a QER (QB Efficiency Rating) of 311.8.

As for QBR, I believe that is out of 100. It's something more understandable than QER. It takes rushing, opponent, passing, everything into account. I think it's a bit more reliable than QER. That being said, I don't know the weight that coaches put on it.



"weight that coaches put on it." I would expect about the same as they value a recruiting services star rating.

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
Kevin Finnegan
General User

Member Since: 2/4/2005
Location: Rockton, IL
Post Count: 1,146

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/22/2018 6:23:09 PM 
Bcat2 wrote:
finnOhio wrote:
bshot44 wrote:
Most useless stat going ... QBR. It's garbage.

http://footballscoop.com/news/mike-leach-makes-case-usele... /



The article and your mention are arguing two separate things. Leach is arguing that the QER is the most useless stat, that's the one that can go through the roof. For example, Rourke had a QER (QB Efficiency Rating) of 311.8.

As for QBR, I believe that is out of 100. It's something more understandable than QER. It takes rushing, opponent, passing, everything into account. I think it's a bit more reliable than QER. That being said, I don't know the weight that coaches put on it.



"weight that coaches put on it." I would expect about the same as they value a recruiting services star rating.



Then that would be a decent amount, then. If you don't think PJ Fleck cared about the stars on football recruits, you're kidding yourself. He championed the talent of his recruiting classes annually, which was easily based on other offers and stars. I don't think it's the end-all, be-all, but I do think there are some coaches who do pay attention to the stars for some recruits. I don't think all do, and doubt that Frank does.

Back to Top
  
OhioCatFan
General User



Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,366

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/22/2018 8:33:56 PM 
Speaking of Fleck, my cousins in Minnesota are calling him "Jackass Fleck." They don't like the results they are seeing on the field, and one of them told me as an alumnus of the U of M he is ashamed of the antics he sees on the field "with all this row your boat stuff." I don't think Minnesota was the right spot for him.

The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

Back to Top
  
Bcat2
General User

Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/22/2018 9:11:44 PM 
finnOhio wrote:
Bcat2 wrote:
finnOhio wrote:
bshot44 wrote:
Most useless stat going ... QBR. It's garbage.

http://footballscoop.com/news/mike-leach-makes-case-usele... /



The article and your mention are arguing two separate things. Leach is arguing that the QER is the most useless stat, that's the one that can go through the roof. For example, Rourke had a QER (QB Efficiency Rating) of 311.8.

As for QBR, I believe that is out of 100. It's something more understandable than QER. It takes rushing, opponent, passing, everything into account. I think it's a bit more reliable than QER. That being said, I don't know the weight that coaches put on it.



"weight that coaches put on it." I would expect about the same as they value a recruiting services star rating.



Then that would be a decent amount, then. If you don't think PJ Fleck cared about the stars on football recruits, you're kidding yourself. He championed the talent of his recruiting classes annually, which was easily based on other offers and stars. I don't think it's the end-all, be-all, but I do think there are some coaches who do pay attention to the stars for some recruits. I don't think all do, and doubt that Frank does.



Fleck, 2008/9, recruited very good talent for NIU. Mostly two stars, some walk-ons, just a few three stars. Jordan Lynch chose NIU only because NIU was the only school willing to bring him in at QB. Fleck is ambitious, he is all about talent. So far he has never coached a recruit as a fifth year senior. Only one season has he coached his own recruits as fourth year seniors. I am sure he has passed on many three star recruits that did not measure up to his standards. Oh, Ohio is in his debt for letting three star Brett Kitrell slip through his fingers. Jan 27, 20016 Brett Kitrell decommits from Minn/Fleck, Jan 30, 2016 Brett Kitrell commits to Ohio. Brett Kitrell #61 on your Ohio roster. I sincerely believe coach Fleck and his staff do "all" of their own talent evaluation. His 3.5 mil salary depends upon it.

Last Edited: 10/22/2018 9:14:41 PM by Bcat2

"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men." JFK

Back to Top
  
Cats-22
General User

Member Since: 9/30/2006
Post Count: 370

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/23/2018 7:57:37 AM 
Nathan Rourke, OHIO 82.4
Mitchell Guadagni, TOL 75.3
Tyree Jackson, BUFF 73.8
Jon Wassink, WMU 71.8
Riley Neal, BALL 62.3
Gus Ragland, M-OH 57.2
Jarret Doege, BGSU 49.3
Tyler Wiegers, EMU 48.7
Woody Barrett, KENT 48.5
Kato Nelson, AKRON 46.6
Marcus Childers, NIU 37.4
Tommy Lazzaro, CMU 30.2
Back to Top
  
bshot44
General User



Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/23/2018 11:46:05 AM 
finnOhio wrote:
bshot44 wrote:
Most useless stat going ... QBR. It's garbage.

http://footballscoop.com/news/mike-leach-makes-case-usele... /



The article and your mention are arguing two separate things. Leach is arguing that the QER is the most useless stat, that's the one that can go through the roof. For example, Rourke had a QER (QB Efficiency Rating) of 311.8.

As for QBR, I believe that is out of 100. It's something more understandable than QER. It takes rushing, opponent, passing, everything into account. I think it's a bit more reliable than QER. That being said, I don't know the weight that coaches put on it.



Thanks to an old message board friend, it was pointed out that Leach was referring to QER ... not QBR. So my apologies for sure.

But I think you are pretty accurate with your assessment that coaches might not put much stock into QBR either.

As with almost everything ESPN does ... it's a marketing ploy to further pat themselves on the back and bring the conversation back around to be centered on them. An ESPN-made statistic to help further drive their narrative.

Reason #3890247123908470123987409812374 that ESPN is THE. WORST.
Back to Top
  
Ted Thompson
Administrator



Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,651

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 10/24/2018 8:58:04 AM 

It's obviously hard to put a number on quarterback performance but QBR is pretty good. If you use the eyeball test for the top QBs in the nation or in the MAC, it seems directionally correct.

Here is ESPN's explanation of QBR: http://www.espn.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/123701/how-is-total-qbr-calculated-we-explain-our-quarterback-rating

A little dated but here is Football Perspective's analysis of QBR: http://www.footballperspective.com/is-espns-qbr-the-best-measure-of-quarterback-play/

Follow Ohio Football recruiting on the BobcatAttack.com football recruiting database.

Back to Top
  
Ted Thompson
Administrator



Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,651

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 11/2/2018 10:14:07 AM 

After last night's monster performance, Rourke moves into the Top 10 nationally.

2018 FBS (I-A) Leaders

RK PLAYER PASS EPA RUN EPA SACK EPA PEN EPA TOTAL EPA ACT PLAYS RAW QBR TOTAL QBR
1 Tua Tagovailoa, ALA 52.3 6.4 -2.9 -0.3 55.4 188 97.3 97.3
2 Kyler Murray, OKLA 62.6 19.9 -4.2 0.1 78.3 272 96.3 97.2
3 D'Eriq King, HOU 53.6 23.7 -2.6 1.3 76.2 360 90.3 87.7
4 Ryan Finley, NCST 49.4 2.7 -2.3 2.7 52.5 317 84.0 84.6
5 Dwayne Haskins, OSU 62.8 -4.2 -4.7 0.6 54.2 379 79.5 83.9
6 Will Grier, WVU 51.1 3.1 -11.4 -0.5 42.2 275 82.6 83.1
7 Marcus McMaryion, FRES 51.0 6.5 -4.6 0.1 53.0 300 85.0 82.6
8 Zac Thomas, APP 18.5 10.7 -2.8 2.2 28.7 197 80.9 81.9
9 Gardner Minshew, WSU 73.7 3.7 -5.1 1.5 73.8 476 80.0 81.9
10 Nathan Rourke, OHIO 29.3 27.1 -9.4 4.6 51.4 297 83.4 81.4

Follow Ohio Football recruiting on the BobcatAttack.com football recruiting database.

Back to Top
  
Ted Thompson
Administrator



Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,651

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 11/2/2018 10:15:04 AM 

Rourke's game by game performance

2018 GAME LOG PASSING RUSHING QBR
DATE OPP RESULT   CMP ATT YDS CMP% LNG TD INT RAT ATT YDS
9/1 Howard W 38-32 2 8 44 25.0 32 0 0 71.2 5 16 3.2 11 0 15.0 4.5
9/15 @Virginia L 45-31 16 31 246 51.6 37 2 0 139.6 5 41 8.2 70 0 63.7 79.2
9/22 @Cincinnati L 34-30 12 27 178 44.4 41 1 1 104.6 9 96 10.7 37 1 77.0 87.7
9/29 UMass W 58-42 23 32 270 71.9 31 3 1 167.4 16 189 11.8 34 1 94.3 88.8
10/6 @Kent State W 27-26 18 20 284 90.0 59 1 1 215.8 15 49 3.3 11 1 74.0 70.7
10/13 @Northern Illinois L 24-21 15 23 275 65.2 70 2 1 185.7 10 0 0.0 13 0 77.2 83.4
10/20 Bowling Green W 49-14 8 12 193 66.7 76 4 0 311.8 10 101 10.1 25 1 99.5 98.6
10/25 Ball State W 52-14 11 19 127 57.9 24 1 1 120.9 8 77 9.6 37 2 47.4 32.5
11/1 @Western Michigan W 59-14 12 14 149 85.7 33 3 0 245.8 9 68 7.6 17 2 97.5 96.2

Follow Ohio Football recruiting on the BobcatAttack.com football recruiting database.

Back to Top
  
bshot44
General User



Member Since: 2/12/2012
Post Count: 2,211

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 11/2/2018 10:21:24 AM 
But I get blasted for suggesting the ball remain in Rourke's hands more a couple weeks ago.

The kid is a playmaker.

And his decision making is getting better each game. Made a really nice throwaway out of bounds last night instead of trying to force it.

Let's see how he holds up in three HUGE games the next three weeks.

Ohio controls their destiny ... it's all right in front of them if they win out.

But we've been down this road before ...

Last Edited: 11/2/2018 10:21:56 AM by bshot44
Back to Top
  
allen
General User

Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,635

Status: Offline
  Message Not Read  RE: QBR ratings, MAC quarterbacks, 2018
   Posted: 11/2/2018 10:56:36 AM 
Ted Thompson wrote:
Rourke's game by game performance 2018 GAME LOG PASSING RUSHING QBR DATE OPP RESULT CMP ATT YDS CMP% LNG TD INT RAT ATT YDS 9/1 http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/47/howard-... W http://www.espn.com/ncf/recap/_/id/401020675 2 8 44 25.0 32 0 0 71.2 5 16 3.2 11 0 15.0 4.5 9/15 @http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/258/virgin... L http://www.espn.com/ncf/recap/_/id/401013117 16 31 246 51.6 37 2 0 139.6 5 41 8.2 70 0 63.7 79.2 9/22 @http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/2132/cinci... L http://www.espn.com/ncf/recap/_/id/401019491 12 27 178 44.4 41 1 1 104.6 9 96 10.7 37 1 77.0 87.7 9/29 http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/113/umass-... W http://www.espn.com/ncf/boxscore/_/id/401013361 23 32 270 71.9 31 3 1 167.4 16 189 11.8 34 1 94.3 88.8 10/6 @http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/2309/kent-... W http://www.espn.com/ncf/recap/_/id/401020755 18 20 284 90.0 59 1 1 215.8 15 49 3.3 11 1 74.0 70.7 10/13 @http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/2459/north... L http://www.espn.com/ncf/recap/_/id/401020758 15 23 275 65.2 70 2 1 185.7 10 0 0.0 13 0 77.2 83.4 10/20 http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/189/bowlin... W http://www.espn.com/ncf/recap/_/id/401020762 8 12 193 66.7 76 4 0 311.8 10 101 10.1 25 1 99.5 98.6 10/25 http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/2050/ball-... W http://www.espn.com/ncf/recap/_/id/401020766 11 19 127 57.9 24 1 1 120.9 8 77 9.6 37 2 47.4 32.5 11/1 @http://www.espn.com/college-football/team/_/id/2711/weste... W http://www.espn.com/ncf/boxscore/_/id/401020773 12 14 149 85.7 33 3 0 245.8 9 68 7.6 17 2 97.5 96.2

His PFF rating for this week should be legendary. He played a flawless game.

Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach. Woody Hayes
Back to Top
  
Showing Replies:  1 - 25  of 35 Posts
Jump to Page:  1 | 2    Next >
View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             



WHO'S ONLINE
There are 257 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com
256 Guests
1 Registered User:
 shabamon
There are no other users looking at this page.




Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties