BobcatAttack.com - For Fans of Ohio University Sports

Welcome Guest!
Create an Account

site search

about us

advertise with us

help

BobcatAttack.com Message Board

Ohio Football

Topic: RE: QB Controversy

Topic: RE: QB Controversy

Author

Message

OhioCatFan
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 14,731

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 9/23/2024 10:21:11 AM

RufusCat09 wrote:

SBH wrote:

Our controversy is that we have 2 not very good QBs.

100% correct.

Will our #1 QB rest this week to give his wrist time to heal? QB #3 or #4 should get the job done against Akron.

The only BLSS Certified Hypocrite on BA

"It is better to be an optimist and be proven a fool than to be a pessimist and be proven right."

Note: My avatar is the national colors of the 78th Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry, which are now preserved in a climate controlled vault at the Ohio History Connection. Learn more about the old 78th at: http://www.78ohio.org

M.D.W.S.T
General User

Member Since: 12/23/2021
Post Count: 2,820

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 9/23/2024 12:28:50 PM

SBH wrote:

Our controversy is that we have 2 not very good QBs.

LOL

It would appear that its more like we *4 not very good QBs.

Deciduous Forest Cat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Ohio
Post Count: 4,466

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 9/23/2024 12:42:59 PM

M.D.W.S.T wrote:

SBH wrote:

Our controversy is that we have 2 not very good QBs.

LOL

It would appear that its more like we *4 not very good QBs.

If the truth about Navarro is that his injury was before his picks last week, which I understand is the case, I would say that he is receiving too much flack for what has been a very solid start to his season. We knew he wasn't a slinger like Rourke, but he's managed the game well and run a balanced attack through 2.5 (ok, 2.3) games. At this point, I'm comfortable with a HEALTHY Navarro running this offense.

Regardless, we can't have fumbles on the exchange like we did 5 yards from paydirt, and pass coverage has to improve (be healthier?). Two mega turnovers and too many long conversions last week turned a competitive game into a blowout. I was not expecting to win at Kentucky, but I did expect a more competitive outcome.

Last Edited: 9/23/2024 12:43:48 PM by Deciduous Forest Cat

L.C.
General User

Member Since: 8/31/2005
Location: United States
Post Count: 10,491

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 9/23/2024 1:44:29 PM

L.C. wrote:

BillyTheCat wrote:

If you can�t block it ain�t going to matter if it�s an inside zone or an outside zone.

...in which case, the proper course of action is to call for the offensive coordinator's head, because he keeps calling plays that don't work.

...or maybe blame the QB for plays that don't work. Or a little of both...
;)

You definitely called it, Billy. Ohio could not move the ball very well against the Kentucky defense.

�We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.� ― Epictetus

colobobcat66
General User

Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,544

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 9/30/2024 1:52:48 PM

M.D.W.S.T wrote:

SBH wrote:

Our controversy is that we have 2 not very good QBs.

LOL

It would appear that its more like we *4 not very good QBs.

And Navarro is number 2 in the MAC in QB rating so I guess the whole MAC QB�s suck

Doc Bobcat
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,280

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 9/30/2024 2:14:19 PM

colobobcat66 wrote:

M.D.W.S.T wrote:

SBH wrote:

Our controversy is that we have 2 not very good QBs.

LOL

It would appear that its more like we *4 not very good QBs.

And Navarro is number 2 in the MAC in QB rating so I guess the whole MAC QB�s suck

Take away that 3 interception game and the picture looks better.

As long as he doesn�t make mistakes his running ability should give defenses some trouble,

I can�t believe that Owen is OUr only serviceable WR.

Other WRs must step up.

M.D.W.S.T
General User

Member Since: 12/23/2021
Post Count: 2,820

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 9/30/2024 2:21:42 PM

Doc Bobcat wrote:

colobobcat66 wrote:

M.D.W.S.T wrote:

SBH wrote:

Our controversy is that we have 2 not very good QBs.

LOL

It would appear that its more like we *4 not very good QBs.

And Navarro is number 2 in the MAC in QB rating so I guess the whole MAC QB�s suck

Surprised it took so long for Rodarte to get a catch this year. And Pugh hasn't been involved much either. I don't think Dennis has any offensive snaps this season?

Three guys who haven't been here long, but Owen is putting them to shame right now.

colobobcat66
General User

Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,544

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 9/30/2024 3:01:34 PM

M.D.W.S.T wrote:

SBH wrote:

Our controversy is that we have 2 not very good QBs.

LOL

It would appear that its more like we *4 not very good QBs.

Don�t fret too much-Navarro has the number 2 QB rating in the MAC, so everybody else is no good either

Andrew Ruck
General User

Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,204

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 9/30/2024 8:39:23 PM

I'm a Navarro fan when calibrated to MAC standards. He has the ability to win us a lot of games.

Andrew Ruck
B.B.A. 2003

bobcatsquared
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,410

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 9/30/2024 9:22:06 PM

M.D.W.S.T wrote:

I don't think Dennis has any offensive snaps this season?

I believe Dennis had a reverse end-around v. Kentucky for a decent gain. He might have been concussed on the play, however, and we haven't seen him since.

SBH
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,241

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 10/1/2024 7:23:27 AM

Didn't he fumble the ball out of bounds (barely) against KY?

bobcatsquared
General User

Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,410

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 10/1/2024 9:31:14 AM

He did. Refs ruled he was down before fumbling, otherwise UK had the turnover.

M.D.W.S.T
General User

Member Since: 12/23/2021
Post Count: 2,820

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 10/1/2024 9:40:24 AM

bobcatsquared wrote:

M.D.W.S.T wrote:

I don't think Dennis has any offensive snaps this season?

I believe Dennis had a reverse end-around v. Kentucky for a decent gain. He might have been concussed on the play, however, and we haven't seen him since.

Yep. That's it. Probably why I couldn't find it in the box scores. 1 carry for 10 yards. 0 rec.

Valley Cat
General User

Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Jackson Twp., OH
Post Count: 1,211

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 10/1/2024 11:28:09 AM

There has to be some level of concern that Owen is the only factor in the passing game. Last week he had three catches and nobody had more than one. This is becoming a theme. The outside receivers are either not getting open or Navarro doesn't have great chemistry with these guys.
Some of the WR's aren't getting much run. Rodarte and Pugh come to mind. Could be taking a while for them to get up to speed. Dennis I believe wasn't dressed on Saturday.

Andrew Ruck
General User

Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 5,204

Status: Offline

RE: QB Controversy

Posted: 10/2/2024 3:10:01 PM

Owen has been very impressive out there. What a shame he only has one year here.

Andrew Ruck
B.B.A. 2003

Showing Replies:	26 - 40 of 40 Posts
Jump to Page:	< Previous 1 \| 2

View Other 'Ohio Football' Topics

There are 260 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com

259 Guests
1 Registered User:
	Old Zone

There are no other users looking at this page.