Welcome Guest! Create an Account login email: password: remember me: BASKETBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting FOOTBALL Latest News News Archive Schedule/Results Multi-Media Recruiting MESSAGE BOARD Message Home - Ohio Basketball - Ohio Basketball Recruiting - The O Zone - Ohio Football - Ohio Football Recruiting - Ohio Volleyball - Ohio Baseball - Ohio Olympic Sports... - General OU Discussion... - Website Feedback... - Posting Policy Edit My Profile Private Messages Logout CHAT LINKS site searchwhere to watchcontact usabout usadvertise with ushelp Message Board BobcatAttack.com Message Board Ohio Basketball Topic:  RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers? Topic:  RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers? Author Message JSF General User Member Since: 1/29/2005 Location: Houston, TX Post Count: 6,528 Status: Offline     RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers?    Posted: 5/29/2024 1:28:32 AM  If it's a house of cards, why should I be upset if it falls? Maybe the death of college sports as we know it will be a good thing. "Loyalty to a hometown or city is fleeting and interchangeable, but college is a stamp of identity."- Kyle Whelliston, One Beautiful Season. My blog about depression and mental illness: https://bit.ly/3buGXH8 Back to Top JimLurker34 General User Member Since: 12/7/2023 Location: McArthur, OH Post Count: 244 Status: Offline     RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers?    Posted: 5/29/2024 10:57:02 AM  GraffZ06 wrote: If they're paid employees, with benefits and collective bargaining - they're pros. They aren't amateur college students who happen to play athletics. Hence, collegiate athletics as we know it is done. Doesn't mean games won't be played with school names and colors (which now mean nothing other than a means to continue revenue streams) on the jerseys. Pro ball for sure. What we're ending up with is an educational institution running a professional athletic program as a side venture. What could go wrong with this model? Well, here's just one example: A friend, who is a lawyer, says that there are IRS rules that impose a stiff penalty for a tax-exempt organization paying employees exorbitant salaries. I've heard rumors that some P5 schools are paying in excess of $1,000,000 for a QB. If true, that exceeds the level where penalties are imposed. I suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg of unintended consequences of NIL and its progeny. Back to Top JimLurker34 General User Member Since: 12/7/2023 Location: McArthur, OH Post Count: 244 Status: Offline     RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers?    Posted: 5/29/2024 10:59:54 AM  JimLurker34 wrote: GraffZ06 wrote: If they're paid employees, with benefits and collective bargaining - they're pros. They aren't amateur college students who happen to play athletics. Hence, collegiate athletics as we know it is done. Doesn't mean games won't be played with school names and colors (which now mean nothing other than a means to continue revenue streams) on the jerseys. Pro ball for sure. What we're ending up with is an educational institution running a professional athletic program as a side venture. What could go wrong with this model? Well, here's just one example: A friend, who is a lawyer, says that there are IRS rules that impose a stiff penalty for a tax-exempt organization paying employees exorbitant salaries. I've heard rumors that some P5 schools are paying in excess of $1,000,000 for a QB. If true, that exceeds the level where penalties are imposed. I suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg of unintended consequences of NIL and its progeny. Hmm. . . As I think about this further, I wonder why this rule hasn't been applied to coach's salaries. Back to Top ohiocatfan1 General User Member Since: 9/6/2016 Post Count: 361 Status: Offline     RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers?    Posted: 5/29/2024 2:12:42 PM  JimLurker34 wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: GraffZ06 wrote: If they're paid employees, with benefits and collective bargaining - they're pros. They aren't amateur college students who happen to play athletics. Hence, collegiate athletics as we know it is done. Doesn't mean games won't be played with school names and colors (which now mean nothing other than a means to continue revenue streams) on the jerseys. Pro ball for sure. What we're ending up with is an educational institution running a professional athletic program as a side venture. What could go wrong with this model? Well, here's just one example: A friend, who is a lawyer, says that there are IRS rules that impose a stiff penalty for a tax-exempt organization paying employees exorbitant salaries. I've heard rumors that some P5 schools are paying in excess of $1,000,000 for a QB. If true, that exceeds the level where penalties are imposed. I suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg of unintended consequences of NIL and its progeny. Hmm. . . As I think about this further, I wonder why this rule hasn't been applied to coach's salaries. Don't talk about that. That's the part of the "traditional" college experience that coaches love. Back to Top Cleveburg Bri General User Member Since: 1/18/2006 Post Count: 50 Status: Offline     RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers?    Posted: 5/29/2024 3:33:22 PM  JimLurker34 wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: GraffZ06 wrote: If they're paid employees, with benefits and collective bargaining - they're pros. They aren't amateur college students who happen to play athletics. Hence, collegiate athletics as we know it is done. Doesn't mean games won't be played with school names and colors (which now mean nothing other than a means to continue revenue streams) on the jerseys. Pro ball for sure. What we're ending up with is an educational institution running a professional athletic program as a side venture. What could go wrong with this model? Well, here's just one example: A friend, who is a lawyer, says that there are IRS rules that impose a stiff penalty for a tax-exempt organization paying employees exorbitant salaries. I've heard rumors that some P5 schools are paying in excess of $1,000,000 for a QB. If true, that exceeds the level where penalties are imposed. I suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg of unintended consequences of NIL and its progeny. Hmm. . . As I think about this further, I wonder why this rule hasn't been applied to coach's salaries. Pretty sure the IRS has already gone after coaches (and hospital execs). If memory serves, although it usually doesn't, I think there's something like a 20% excise tax that the highest compensated now pay. I assume the colleges just add it to the cost of doing business. Last Edited: 5/29/2024 3:35:12 PM by Cleveburg Bri Back to Top JimLurker34 General User Member Since: 12/7/2023 Location: McArthur, OH Post Count: 244 Status: Offline     RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers?    Posted: 5/29/2024 3:54:27 PM  Cleveburg Bri wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: GraffZ06 wrote: If they're paid employees, with benefits and collective bargaining - they're pros. They aren't amateur college students who happen to play athletics. Hence, collegiate athletics as we know it is done. Doesn't mean games won't be played with school names and colors (which now mean nothing other than a means to continue revenue streams) on the jerseys. Pro ball for sure. What we're ending up with is an educational institution running a professional athletic program as a side venture. What could go wrong with this model? Well, here's just one example: A friend, who is a lawyer, says that there are IRS rules that impose a stiff penalty for a tax-exempt organization paying employees exorbitant salaries. I've heard rumors that some P5 schools are paying in excess of $1,000,000 for a QB. If true, that exceeds the level where penalties are imposed. I suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg of unintended consequences of NIL and its progeny. Hmm. . . As I think about this further, I wonder why this rule hasn't been applied to coach's salaries. Pretty sure the IRS has already gone after coaches (and hospital execs). If memory serves, although it usually doesn't, I think there's something like a 20% excise tax that the highest compensated now pay. I assume the colleges just add it to the cost of doing business. Interesting. I didn't know this had already been done. If I remember correctly what my lawyer friend said, the penalty is charged the non-profit institution paying the salary, not the employee. But, you are probably right that these Big Time schools just think of it as the price of doing business. Back to Top BillyTheCat General User Member Since: 10/6/2012 Post Count: 10,224 Status: Offline     RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers?    Posted: 5/29/2024 6:51:31 PM  JimLurker34 wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: GraffZ06 wrote: If they're paid employees, with benefits and collective bargaining - they're pros. They aren't amateur college students who happen to play athletics. Hence, collegiate athletics as we know it is done. Doesn't mean games won't be played with school names and colors (which now mean nothing other than a means to continue revenue streams) on the jerseys. Pro ball for sure. What we're ending up with is an educational institution running a professional athletic program as a side venture. What could go wrong with this model? Well, here's just one example: A friend, who is a lawyer, says that there are IRS rules that impose a stiff penalty for a tax-exempt organization paying employees exorbitant salaries. I've heard rumors that some P5 schools are paying in excess of $1,000,000 for a QB. If true, that exceeds the level where penalties are imposed. I suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg of unintended consequences of NIL and its progeny. Hmm. . . As I think about this further, I wonder why this rule hasn't been applied to coach's salaries. Because they are employees and that would be against the law. Back to Top Cleveburg Bri General User Member Since: 1/18/2006 Post Count: 50 Status: Offline     RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers?    Posted: 5/29/2024 10:18:36 PM  JimLurker34 wrote: Cleveburg Bri wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: GraffZ06 wrote: If they're paid employees, with benefits and collective bargaining - they're pros. They aren't amateur college students who happen to play athletics. Hence, collegiate athletics as we know it is done. Doesn't mean games won't be played with school names and colors (which now mean nothing other than a means to continue revenue streams) on the jerseys. Pro ball for sure. What we're ending up with is an educational institution running a professional athletic program as a side venture. What could go wrong with this model? Well, here's just one example: A friend, who is a lawyer, says that there are IRS rules that impose a stiff penalty for a tax-exempt organization paying employees exorbitant salaries. I've heard rumors that some P5 schools are paying in excess of $1,000,000 for a QB. If true, that exceeds the level where penalties are imposed. I suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg of unintended consequences of NIL and its progeny. Hmm. . . As I think about this further, I wonder why this rule hasn't been applied to coach's salaries. Pretty sure the IRS has already gone after coaches (and hospital execs). If memory serves, although it usually doesn't, I think there's something like a 20% excise tax that the highest compensated now pay. I assume the colleges just add it to the cost of doing business. Interesting. I didn't know this had already been done. If I remember correctly what my lawyer friend said, the penalty is charged the non-profit institution paying the salary, not the employee. But, you are probably right that these Big Time schools just think of it as the price of doing business. Yes, the penalty is for the institution. Here's an old article about a congressional report trying to shine some light on the exorbitant sums colleges are paying just on these excise taxes for coaches' salaries. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2022/12/01/co... / Back to Top BillyTheCat General User Member Since: 10/6/2012 Post Count: 10,224 Status: Offline     RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers?    Posted: 5/30/2024 6:23:12 AM  Cleveburg Bri wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: Cleveburg Bri wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: GraffZ06 wrote: If they're paid employees, with benefits and collective bargaining - they're pros. They aren't amateur college students who happen to play athletics. Hence, collegiate athletics as we know it is done. Doesn't mean games won't be played with school names and colors (which now mean nothing other than a means to continue revenue streams) on the jerseys. Pro ball for sure. What we're ending up with is an educational institution running a professional athletic program as a side venture. What could go wrong with this model? Well, here's just one example: A friend, who is a lawyer, says that there are IRS rules that impose a stiff penalty for a tax-exempt organization paying employees exorbitant salaries. I've heard rumors that some P5 schools are paying in excess of $1,000,000 for a QB. If true, that exceeds the level where penalties are imposed. I suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg of unintended consequences of NIL and its progeny. Hmm. . . As I think about this further, I wonder why this rule hasn't been applied to coach's salaries. Pretty sure the IRS has already gone after coaches (and hospital execs). If memory serves, although it usually doesn't, I think there's something like a 20% excise tax that the highest compensated now pay. I assume the colleges just add it to the cost of doing business. Interesting. I didn't know this had already been done. If I remember correctly what my lawyer friend said, the penalty is charged the non-profit institution paying the salary, not the employee. But, you are probably right that these Big Time schools just think of it as the price of doing business. Yes, the penalty is for the institution. Here's an old article about a congressional report trying to shine some light on the exorbitant sums colleges are paying just on these excise taxes for coaches' salaries. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2022/12/01/co... / Interesting read, thanks Back to Top JimLurker34 General User Member Since: 12/7/2023 Location: McArthur, OH Post Count: 244 Status: Offline     RE: Anyone attend Cincinnati caravan? Did Boals talk about any transfers?    Posted: 5/30/2024 10:03:46 AM  BillyTheCat wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: JimLurker34 wrote: GraffZ06 wrote: If they're paid employees, with benefits and collective bargaining - they're pros. They aren't amateur college students who happen to play athletics. Hence, collegiate athletics as we know it is done. Doesn't mean games won't be played with school names and colors (which now mean nothing other than a means to continue revenue streams) on the jerseys. Pro ball for sure. What we're ending up with is an educational institution running a professional athletic program as a side venture. What could go wrong with this model? Well, here's just one example: A friend, who is a lawyer, says that there are IRS rules that impose a stiff penalty for a tax-exempt organization paying employees exorbitant salaries. I've heard rumors that some P5 schools are paying in excess of $1,000,000 for a QB. If true, that exceeds the level where penalties are imposed. I suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg of unintended consequences of NIL and its progeny. Hmm. . . As I think about this further, I wonder why this rule hasn't been applied to coach's salaries. Because they are employees and that would be against the law. It's because they are employees of a non-profit that this penalty applies to the institution paying the salary. Back to Top Showing Replies:   26 - 35  of 35 Posts Jump to Page:   < Previous    1 | 2 View Other 'Ohio Basketball' Topics                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               WHO'S ONLINE There are 365 Active Visitors on BobcatAttack.com 359 Guests 6 Registered Users:   OU_Country, Kinggeorge4, bobcatsquared, BobcatSports, mcbin, Pete Chouteau There are no other users looking at this page.

Copyright ©2025 BobcatAttack.com. All rights reserved.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties